Some Properties of the Visual Imagery System Investigated through Backward Spelling

Abstract

Kosslyn (1973) and Kosslyn, Ball and Reiser (in press) have claimed that a quasi perceptual “scanning” process operates on visual images. Lea (1975) has suggested that this process should be redescribed in terms of iteration through an underlying list structure. It is known that images are subject to capacity limitations. This restriction of processing capacity suggests a model of imagery in which only information displayed in the image may be scanned, while iteration operates between such successive information displays. Three experiments on backward spelling from images support this view. Words of greater length involve more iteration problems. In Experiment I, backward spelling took longer than forward spelling for 8-letter but not for 4-letter words. Experiment II provides evidence for a directional scanning process, using a Brooksian interference technique. Experiment III demonstrates that the structure of the internal representation affects the manner in which it is iterated and that subjects can modify their iteration strategies.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beech

J. R.

(1976). The limitation of wholistic visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills 42, 1271–5.

Beech

J. R.

(1977). A reaction time study of scanning spatial distance: evidence for the analogical representation of space Paper presented at the N. Ireland Branch of the B.P.S. Annual Conference, Park Hotel, Co. Cavan, Virginia.

Brooks

(1967). The suppression of visualization by reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 19, 280–99.

Brook

(1968). Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology 22, 349–68.

Byrne

(1974). Item concreteness vs. spatial organization as predictors of visual imagery. Memory and Cognition 2, 53–9.

Coltheart

Glick

Marcia J.

(1974). Visual imagery: a case study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 26, 438–53.

Cooper

Lynn A.

Shepard

R. N.

(1973). Chronometric studies of the rotation of images. In Chase

W. G.

(Ed.), Visual Information Processing London: Academic Press ch. 3.

Hampson

P. J.

Morris

P. E.

(1977). Distance effects in visual images: evidence for scanning. IRCS Medical Science 5, 455.

Kelley

J. R.

(1973). Visual imagery and eyeblinking Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Oklahoma State University.

10.

Kosslyn

S. M.

(1973). Scanning visual images: some structural implications. Perception and Psychophysics 14, 90–94.

11.

Kosslyn

S. M.

(1975). Information representation in visual images. Cognitive Psychology 7, 341–70.

12.

Kosslyn

S. M.

Pomerantz

J. R.

(1977). Imagery, propositions and the form of internal representation. Cognitive Psychology 9, 52–76.

13.

Kosslyn

S. M.

Ball

T. M.

Reiser

B. J.

(in press). Scanning visual images II: images preserve metric spatial information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

14.

Lea

(1975). Chronometric Analysis of the method of loci. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance x, 95–104.

15.

Moran

T. P.

(1975). The symbolic imagery hypothesis: a production system model Carnegie Mellon University Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis.

16.

Paivio

(1971). Imagery and Verbal Processes New York: Holt, Rhinehart.

17.

Pylyshyn

Z. W.

(1973). What the mind's eye tells the mind's brain: a critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin 80, 1–24.

18.

Pylyshyn

Z. W.

(1976). Imagery and artificial intelligence. In Savage

(Ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. 9.

19.

Weber

R. J.

Kelley

J. R.

Little

(1972). Is visual image sequencing under verbal control. Journal of Experimental Psychology 96, 354–62.