Several investigations have reported problems in demonstrating for vowels the phenomena of backward masking and right ear advantage so easily demonstrated for consonants. An experiment is reported on the dichotic backward masking (BM) of acoustically similar and dissimilar sets of vowels in consonant-vowel syllables. The results suggest that increasing perceptual difficulty by varying the acoustic similarity of the stimulus set augments BM. A second experiment showed that the right ear advantage (REA) was augmented by manipulating the acoustic similarity of the stimulus set and by decreasing intelligibility through the addition of noise. This and other evidence was employed to ascribe variations in both REA and BM to the interaction of perceptual processing time with information decay in precategorical acoustical storage. It is argued that this process interaction underlies statistical interactions in dichotic data which show that variations in difficulty (discriminability, noise addition, brain deterioration) affect most adversely the least favoured items (those presented earlier, those on the unattended ear, those on the left ear).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenJ.HaggardM. P. (1977). Perception of place and voicing features in whispered speech: a dichotic choice analysis. Perception and Psychophysics21, 315–22.
2.
BroadbentD. E. (1971). Decision and StressLondon: Academic Press.
3.
CrossmanE. R. F. W. (1955). The measurement of discriminability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology7, 176–95.
4.
CrowderR. G. (1973a). Representation of speech sounds in precategorical acoustic storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology98, 14–24.
5.
CrowderR. G. (1973b). Precategorical acoustic storage for vowels of short and long durations. Perception and Psychophysics13, 502–6.
6.
CrystalT. H.HouseA. S. (1974). Effect of local signal level on differential performance in dichotic listening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America55, 434(abstract).
7.
CuttingJ. (1974). Two left-hemisphere mechanisms in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics16, 601–12.
8.
DarwinC. J. (1971). Ear differences in the recall of fricatives and vowels. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology23, 46–62.
9.
DarwinC. J.BaddeleyA. D. (1974). Acoustic memory and the perception of speech. Cognitive Psychology6, 41–60.
10.
DormanM. F.Kewley-PortD.BradyS.TurveyM. T. (1977). Vowel recognition: inferences from studies of forward and backward masking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology29, 483–97.
11.
ForeitK. G. (1976). Short-lived auditory memory for pitch. Perception and Psycho-physics19, 368–70.
12.
FrankfurterA.HoneckR. P. (1973). Ear differences in the recall of monaurally presented sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology25, 138–46.
13.
GodfreyJ. J. (1974). Perceptual difficulty and the right ear advantage for vowels. Brain and LanguageI, 323–35.
14.
GoodlassH.PeckE. A. (1972). Dichotic ear order effects in Korsakoff and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia10, 211–17.
15.
HaggardM. P. (1971). Encoding and the REA for speech signals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology23, 34–45.
16.
HaggardM. P. (1977). Dichotic Listening. In LeibowitzH.TeuberH. L.HeldR. (Eds), Handbook of Sensory PhysiologyNew York: Springer-Verlag Vol. VIII.
17.
HickW. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology4, 11–26.
18.
InglisI.SandersonR. E. (1961). Successive response to simultaneous stimulation in elderly patients with memory disorders. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology62, 709–12.
19.
KinsbourneM. (1973). The control of attention by interaction between the hemispheres. In KornblumS. (Ed.), Attention and Performance, IVNew York: Academic Press.
20.
KinsbourneM. (1974). Direction of gaze and distribution of cerebral thought processes. Neuropsychologia12, 279–81.
21.
LibermanA. M.CooperF. S.ShankweilerD. P.Studdert-KennedyM. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review74, 431–61.
22.
LibermanA. M.MattinglyI. G.TurveyM. T. (1972). Language codes and memory codes. In MeltonA. W.MartinE. (Eds), Coding Processes in Human MemoryNew York: J. Wiley.
23.
PisoniD. B. (1973). Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels. Perception and Psychophysics13, 253–60.
24.
PorterR. J.ShankweilerD.LibermanA. (1969). Differential effects of binaural time differences on the perception of stop consonants and vowelsWashington D.C.15–16Proceedings of the 77th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association.
25.
PorterR. J.MirabileP. J. (1977). Dichotic and monotic interactions between speech and non-speech sounds at different stimulus onset asynchronies. Perception and Psychophysics21, 408–12.
26.
SanfordA. J. (1971). Effects of changes in the intensity of white noise on simultaneity judgements and simply reaction time. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology23, 296–303.
27.
SparksR.GoodlassH.NickelB. (1970). Ipsilateral versus contralateral extinction in dichotic listening resulting from hemisphere lesions. Cortex6, 249–60.
28.
SpellacyF.BlumsteinS. (1970). The influence of language set on ear preference in phoneme recognition. Cortex6, 430–39.
29.
SternbergS. (1967). Two operations in character recognition: some evidence from reaction-time measurements. Perception and Psychophysics2, 45–53.
30.
Studdert-KennedyM.ShankweilerD. (1970). Hemispheric specialisation for speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America48, 579–94.
31.
SummerfieldA. Q.HaggardM. P. (1977). Perceptual calibration for parameters of speaker differences—measures from sequential reaction-time increment studies. In DornicS. (Ed.), Attention and Performance VIHillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32.
WeissM. S.HouseA. S. (1973). Perception of dichotically presented vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America38, 583–9.
33.
WoodC. C.DayR. S. (1975). Failure of selective attention to phonetic segments in consonant-vowel syllables. Perception and Psychophysics17, 346–50.
