The Symbolic Distance Effect for Alphabetic Order Judgements: A Subjective Report and Reaction Time Analysis

Abstract

The time needed to decide whether a pair of letters is in the correct alphabetic order varies inversely with alphabetic separation. This is an example of a phenomenon generally found with the comparison of ordered symbols or concepts, called the symbolic distance effect (Moyer and Bayer, 1976). It is argued that when letters are compared, an important determinant of this effect is the degree to which subjects subvocally run-through parts of the alphabet to determine the correctness of the order of a stimulus pair. A trial-by-trial introspection procedure coupled with reaction time measurements is used in the present experiment, in which letter order judgements were made over a range of separations. RTs increased with increasing number of letters in the reported run-through. At small letter separations, run-through occurred more frequently, and this was found to be the basis of the symbolic distance effect. For trials on which no run-through was reported the symbolic distance effect was absent. The data are summarized as a model in which comparisons are made from directly available order information from memory, or with an additional run-through process. The details of the run-through process suggest that groupings learned in childhood are probably involved in the selection of the starting letter for run-through.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Banks

W. P.

Fujii

Kayara-Stuart

(1976). Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgements of magnitude of digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2, 435–47.

Buckley

P. B.

Gillman

C. B.

(1974). Comparison of digit and dot patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103, 1131–6.

Holyoak

K. J.

(1977). The form of analog size information in memory. Cognitive Psychology 9, 31–57.

Holyoak

K. J.

Walker

J. H.

(1976). Subjective magnitude information in semantic orderings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15, 287–99.

Landauer

T. K.

(1962). Rate of implicit speech. Perceptual and Motor Skills 15, 646.

Lovelace

E. A.

Snodgrass

R. D.

(1971). Decision times for alphabetic order of letter pairs. Journal of Experimental Psychology 88, 258–64.

Moyer

R. S.

(1973). Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics. Perception and Psychophysics 13, 180–4.

Moyer

R. S.

Bayer

R. H.

(1976). Mental comparisons and the symbolic distance effect. Cognitive Psychology 8, 228–46.

Moyer

R. S.

Landauer

T. K.

(1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature 215, 1519–20.

10.

Parkman

J. M.

(1971). Temporal aspects of digit and letter inequality judgements. Journal of Experimental Psychology 91, 191–205.

11.

Potts

G. R.

(1974). Storing and retrieving information about ordered relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103, 431–9.

12.

Restle

(1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology 83, 274–8.

13.

Siegel

(1956). Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences New York: McGraw-Hill.

14.

Sternberg

(1967). Retrieval of contextual information from memory. Psychonomic Science 8, 55–6.

15.

Svenson

(1974). Analysis of time required by children for simple additions. Report from the Psychological Laboratories University of Stockholm.

16.

Wilkes

A. L.

Kennedy

R. A.

(1970). The relative accessability of list items within different pause-defined groups. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 9, 197–201.