The perceptual complexity of intransitive adverbials, truncated passives and full passives was investigated in two experiments using rapid visual processing tasks. Both forms of passive were found to be more complex than the intransitive adverbials, presumably because of the lack of correspondence of surface and base orders. However, deletion of the logical subject in truncated passives did not increase their complexity relative to full passives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlumenthalA. L. (1967). Prompted recall of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior6, 203–6.
2.
ClarkH. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: a critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior12, 335–59.
3.
DoolingD. J. (1972). Some context effects in the speeded comprehension of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology93, 56–62.
4.
FodorJ. A. (1971). Current approaches to syntax recognition. Perception of LanguageHortonD. L.JenkinsJ. J.Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.
5.
FodorJ. A.GarrettM. (1967). Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity. Perception and Psychophysics2, 289–96.
6.
ForsterK. I. (1970). Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception and Psychophysics8, 215–21.
7.
ForsterK. I.OlbreiI. F. (1973). Semantic heuristics and syntactic analysis. Cognition2, 319–47.
8.
ForsterK. I.RyderL. A. (1971). Perceiving the structure and meaning of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior10, 285–96.
9.
HakesD. T. (1972). Effects of reducing complement constructions on sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior11, 278–86.
10.
HakesD. T.CairnsH. S. (1970). Sentence comprehension and relative pronouns. Perception and Psychophysics8, 5–8.
11.
HaysW. (1963). Statistics for PsychologistsNew York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
12.
HolmesV. M. (1973). Order of main and subordinate clauses in sentence perception. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior12, 285–93.
13.
HolmesV. M.ForsterK. I. (1972). Perceptual complexity and underlying sentence structure. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior11, 148–56.
14.
KučeraH.FrancisW. (1967). Computational Analysis of Present-day American EnglishProvidence: Brown University Press.
15.
MillerG. A.IsardS. (1963). Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior2, 217–28.
16.
MooreT. E. (1972). Speeded recognition of ungrammaticality. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior11, 550–60.
17.
SlobinD. I. (1966). Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior5, 219–27.
18.
SlobinD. I. (1968). Recall of full and truncated passive sentences in connected discourse. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior7, 876–81.
19.
WattW. C. (1970). On two hypotheses concerning psycholinguistics. Cognition and the Development of LanguageHayesJ. R.New York: Wiley.
