Previous research has shown that the positive effect of imageability upon recall is confined to abstract items. In Experiment I it was found that imageability would affect the recall of concrete items if subjects were instructed to use imagery in their memorizing. This suggested that imagery is not usually employed in remembering concrete items. In Experiment II subjects were asked to categorize items on the basis of their meaning. A majority showed sorting related to the concreteness of the items, but very few showed sorting related to imageability. In Experiment III it was found that the concreteness of an item correlated with the time taken to produce a free associate to it, but that its imageability did not. It was concluded that concreteness is a feature of lexical organization, and not a measure of the image-arousing quality of verbal material.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoseR. C.ClatworthyW. H.ShrikandeS. S. (1954). Tables of partially balanced designs with two associate classes Technical Bulletin No. 107. North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh, N.C.
2.
BowerG. H. (1970). Imagery as a relational organizer in associative learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior9, 529–33.
3.
BowerG. H. (1972). Mental imagery and associative learning. Cognition in Learning and MemoryGreggL. W.New York: Wiley.
4.
ChomskyN. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. Readings in English Transformational GrammarJacobsR. A.RosenbaumP. S.Waltham, Mass.: Ginn.
5.
ClarkH. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: a critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior12, 335–59.
6.
CramerP. (1968). Word AssociationNew York: Academic Press.
7.
ErnestC. H.PaivioA. (1971). Imagery and verbal associative latencies as a function of imagery ability. Canadian Journal of Psychology25, 83–90.
8.
KintschW. (1972a). Abstract nouns: imagery versus lexical complexity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior11, 59–65.
9.
KintschW. (1972b). Notes on the structure of semantic memory. Organization of MemoryTulvingE.DonaldsonW.New York: Academic Press.
10.
LambertW. E. (1955). Associative fluency as a function of stimulus abstractness. Canadian Journal of Psychology9, 103–6.
11.
LoewenthalK. (1969). The form class of word associations to nominalizations and adjectivalizations. Psychonomic Science16, 197–8.
12.
MandlerG. (1967). Organization and memory. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and TheorySpenceK. W.SpenceJ. T.New York: Academic PressVol. I.
13.
MednickM. T.MednickS. A.JungC. G. (1964). Continual association as a function of level of creativity and type of verbal stimulus. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology69, 511–15.
14.
MillerG. A. (1967). Psycholinguistic approaches to the study of communication. Journeys in ScienceArmD. L.Albuquerque: The University of New Mexico Press.
15.
MillerG. A. (1969). A psychological method to investigate verbal concepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology6, 169–91.
16.
MillerG. A. (1972). English verbs of motion: a case study in semantics and lexical memory. Coding Processes in Human MemoryMeltonA. W.MartinE.New York: Wiley.
17.
MorrisP. E. (1972). Linking images and free recallUniversity of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne Paper read at the meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society.
18.
NobleC. E. (1952). An analysis of meaning. Psychological Review59, 421–30.
19.
OsgoodC. E.SuciG. J.TannenbaumP. H. (1957). The Measurement of MeaningUrbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.
20.
PaivioA. (1966). Latency of verbal associations and imagery to noun stimuli as a function of abstractness and generality. Canadian Journal of Psychology20, 378–87.
21.
PaivioA. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review76, 241–63.
22.
PaivioA. (1971). Imagery and Verbal ProcessesNew York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
23.
PaivioA.FothD. (1970). Imaginal and verbal mediators and noun concreteness in paired-associate learning: The elusive interaction. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior9, 384–90.
24.
PaivioA.YuilleJ. C.MadiganS. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology76, (1, Pt. 2).
25.
PollioH. R. (1964). Composition of associative clusters. Journal of Experimental Psychology67, 199–208.
26.
RichardsonJ. T. E. (1975). Imagery, concreteness, and lexical complexity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology27, 170–82.
27.
SpreenO.SchulzR. W. (1966). Parameters of abstraction, meaningfulness, and pronunciability for 329 nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior5, 459–68.
28.
ThorndikeE. L.LorgeI. (1944). The Teacher's Word Book of 30,000 WordsNew York: Teachers College.
29.
WinerB. J. (1962). Statistical Principles in Experimental DesignNew York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
WinnickW. A.KresselK. (1965). Tachistoscopic recognition thresholds, paired-associate learning, and immediate recall as a function of abstractness-concreteness and word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology70, 163–8.
31.
YuilleJ. C. (1968). Concreteness without imagery in PA learning. Psychonomic Science11, 55–6.
