This paper describes the performance of a subject who, when presented with a word or a sentence, is abnormally proficient at spelling this material in reverse order. She reports that she does this by visualizing this material and reading off from this visual image. Her tachistoscopic performance is also abnormally good. It is suggested that her superiority in these two tasks is achieved principally because her internal visual representations are extremely resistant to disruption by other mental activities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BowerG. H. (1970). Analysis of a mnemonic device. American Scientist.58, 496–510.
2.
BrooksL. R. (1968). Spatial and verbal components of the act of recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology22, 349–68.
3.
ColtheartM. (1972a). Readings in Cognitive PsychologyToronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
4.
ColtheartM. (1972b). Visual information-processing. New Horizons in Psychology 2DodwellP. C.Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
5.
FernaldM. R. (1912). Experimental PsychologyWoodworthR. S.London: Methuen (1939(.
6.
GregoryR. L. (1966). Eye and BrainLondon: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
7.
GummermanK.GrayC. R. (1971). Recall of visually presented material: an unwonted case and bibliography for eidetic imagery. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements4, 189–95.
8.
LeaskJ.HaberR. N.HaberR. B. (1969). Eidetic imagery in children. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements3, no. 35.
9.
MerikleP. M.ColtheartM.LoweD. G. (1971). On the selective effects of a patterned masking stimulus. Canadian Journal of Psychology25, 264–79.
10.
ShepardR. N.FengC. (1972). A chronometric analysis of mental paper-folding. Cognitive Psychology3, 228–43.
11.
ShepardR. N.MetzlerJ. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science (New York)171, 701–3.
12.
SperlingG. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs74, no. 498.
13.
StromeyerC. F. (1970). Eidetikers. Psychology Today4, 76–81.
14.
StromeyerC. F.PsotkaJ. (1970). The detailed texture of eidetic images. Nature (London)225, 346–9.
