The effect of interstimulus interval (ISI) variation on the acquisition of a classically conditioned emotional response was investigated using a one-trial conditioning procedure. The optimum ISI was found to be 10 s with a bidirectional gradient for conditioned suppression at ISI above and below 10 s. Control groups demonstrated that conditioning was not a function of either pseudoconditioning, sensitization or stimulus novelty.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarltonP. L.DidamoP. (1960). Some notes on the control of conditioned suppression. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour3, 255–8.
2.
CarltonP. L.VogelJ. R. (1967). Habituation and conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology63, 348–51.
3.
GormezanoI.MooreW. M. (1969). Classical conditioning. Learning: ProcessesMarxM. H.London: Collier-Macmillan Ltd.121–03.
4.
GuthrieE. R. (1959). Association by contiguity. Psychology: a Study of a ScienceKochS.New York: McGraw-Hill Vol. 2, 158–95.
5.
HullC. L. (1943). Principles of behaviourNew York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
6.
HullC. L. (1952). A behaviour systemNew Haven: Yale University Press.
7.
JonesJ. E. (1962). Contiguity and reinforcement in relation to CS-UCS intervals in classical aversive conditioning. Psychological Review69, 176–86.
8.
KaminL. J. (1961). Trace conditioning of the conditioned emotional response. Journal of Comparative Physiology54, 149–53.
9.
KaminL. J. (1965). Temporal and intensity characteristics of the conditioned stimulus. Classical Conditioning: a SymposiumProkasyW. F.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts118–47.
10.
KimbleG. A. (1961). Hilgard and Marquis: Conditioning and LearningNew York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
11.
LeafR. C.LeafS. R. P. (1966). Recovery time as a measure of degree of conditioned suppression. Psychological Reports18, 265–6.
12.
LeafR. C.MullerS. A. (1965). A simple method for CER conditioning and measurement. Psychological Reports17, 211–15.
13.
LibbyA. (1951). Two variables in the acquisition of depressant properties by a stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology42, 100–07.
14.
LubowR. E.SiebertL. (1969). Latent inhibition within the CER paradigm. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology68, 136–8.
15.
PavlovI. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexesAnrepG. V.London: Oxford University Press.
16.
ProkasyW. F. (1965). Classical eyelid conditioning: Experimenter operations, task demands and response shaping. Classical Conditioning: a SymposiumProkasyW. F.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts218–25.
17.
SchneidermanN. (1966). Interstimulus interval function of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit under delay versus trace conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology62, 397–402.
18.
SmithM. C. (1968). CS-US interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology66, 679–87.
19.
SmithM. C.ColemanS. R.GormezanoI. (1969). Classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response at backward simultaneous, and forward CS-US intervals. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology68, 226–31.
20.
SteinL.SidmanM.BradyJ. V. (1958). Some effects of two temporal variables on conditioned suppression. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour1, 153–62.
21.
WinerB. J. (1963). Statistical principles in experimental designNew York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
WordenF. G.MarshJ. T. (1963). Amplitude changes of auditory potentials evoked at cochlear nucleus during acoustic habituation. EEG and Clinical Neurophysiology15, 866–81.
