Subjects have more difficulty in correctly testing a conditional rule stated in abstract form than the same rule given in “thematic” form. The “thematic” form of the rule involves both concrete terms and a concrete relation. Four experimental conditions were formed by combining concrete abstract terms and relations. Fifty subjects were tested in each condition. The results indicated that concrete-ness of the terms is the main factor leading to improved performance with “thematic” as against abstract material in the rule testing task.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GoodwinR. Q.WasonP. C. (1972). Degrees of insight. British Journal of Psychology63, 205–12.
2.
Johnson-LairdP. N.LegrenziP.LegrenziM. S. (1972). Reasoning and a sense of reality. British Journal of Psychology63, 395–400.
3.
Johnson-LairdP. N.WasonP. C. (1970). A theoretical analysis of insight into a reasoning task. Cognitive Psychology1, 134–48.
4.
PaivioA. (1971). Imagery and verbal processesNew York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
5.
SutcliffeJ. P. (1957). A general method of analysis of frequency data for multiple classification designs. Psychological Bulletin54, 134–7.
6.
WasonP. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology20, 273–81.
7.
WasonP. C. (1969). Regression in reasoning?. British Journal of Psychology60, 471–80.
8.
WasonP. C.Johnson-LairdP. N. (1972). Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and ContentLondon: Batsford.
9.
WasonP. C.ShapiroD. (1971). Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology23, 63–71.
