Memory of a Speaker's Voice: Reaction Time to Same- or Different-voiced Letters

Abstract

Subjects were presented with a sequence of two letters, each letter spoken in either a male or female voice. On each trial, the subject was required to indicate, as quickly as possible, whether the two letters had the same name. Reaction times (RTs) were faster for letters spoken in the same voice for both “same” and “different” responses, even when letters were separated by 8 s. These results are incompatible with the notion of physical and name codes in auditory memory since a “different” response should always be based on a comparison of letter names and should not be influenced by voice quality. It was also found that RTs were not influenced by the phonemic distinctive feature similarity of the letters.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkinson

R. C.

Shiffrin

R. M.

(1968). Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation Spence

K. W.

Spence

J. T.

New York: Academic Press Vol. 2.

Broadbent

D. E.

(1954). The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47, 191–6.

Chananie

Tikofsky

(1968). Reaction time and distinctive features in speech discrimination Proceedings of the May APA Convention.

Cole

Scott

(1972). Distinctive feature control of decision time to simultaneously heard consonants and vowels. Perception and Psychophysics in press.

Conrad

(1962). An association between memory errors and errors due to acoustic masking of speech. Nature (London) 193, 1314–5.

Coltheart

Allard

(1970). Variations on a theme by Posner: physical and name codes for spoken letters Paper presented to the Psychonomic Society, San Antonio, November.

Corballis

M. S.

(1966). Rehearsal and decay in immediate memory of visually and aurally presented items. Canadian Journal of Psychology 20, 43–56.

Crowder

R. G.

(1969). Improved recall for digits with delayed recall cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology 82, 258–62.

McInish

Tikofsky

(1969). Distinctive features and response latency: a pilot study. Perception and Psychophysics 6, 267–8.

10.

Neisser

(1967). Cognitive Psychology New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

11.

Norman

D. A.

(1969). Memory while shadowing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 21, 85–93.

12.

Posner

M. I.

Keele

S. W.

(1967). Decay of visual information from a single letter. Science (New York) 158, 137–9.

13.

Posner

(1969). Abstraction and the process of recognition. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation Spence

K. W.

Spence

J. T.

New York: Academic Press Vol. 3.

14.

Posner

M. I.

Boies

S. J.

Eichelman

W. H.

Taylor

R. L.

(1969). Retention of visual and name codes of single letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs 79, (2) 1.

15.

Sperling

(1960). The Information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 1960 74, (11, No. 498).

16.

Sperling

(1963). A model for visual memory tasks. Human Factors 5, 19–31.

17.

Washburn

M. F.

(1916). Movement and Mental Imagery Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

18.

Weiner

Singh

(1972). Perceptual features of nine English consonants determined by choice reaction time Paper presented to the 83rd meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Buffalo, April.