Two experiments using rats were carried out in which it was shown that a quadratic function can best describe the relation between amount of initial discrimination training and speed of reversal learning for both a difficult visual and an easy spatial task. The results are used to explain the rarity of the over learning reversal effect (ORE) using easy tasks such as position discriminations. Implications for the attention theory are also discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
IwaharaI.SugimuraT. (1960). Discrimination reversal as a function of degree of original learning. Psychologia3, 21–6.
2.
LovejoyE. (1966). Analysis of the overlearning reversal effect. Psychological Review73, 87–102.
3.
MackintoshN. J. (1965). Selective attention in animal discrimination learning. Psychological Bulletin64, 124–150.
4.
MackintoshN. J. (1969). Further analysis of the overtraining reversal effect. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology67, (2 Pt. 2).
5.
PaulC. (1965). Effects of overlearning upon single habit reversal in rats. Psychological Bulletin63, 65–72.
6.
SpenceK. W. (1936). The nature of discrimination learning in animals. Psychological Review43, 427–49.
7.
SperlingS. E. (1965). Reversal learning and resistance to extinction: A review of the rat literature. Psychological Bulletin63, 281–97.
8.
SperlingS. E. (1970). The ORE in simultaneous and differential reversal: Acquisition task, acquisition criterion, and reversal task. Journal of Experimental Psychology84, 349–60.
9.
SutherlandN. S.MackintoshN. J. (1971). Mechanisms of Animal Discrimination LearningNew York: Academic Press.
10.
SwellerJ. (1972). A test between the selective attention and stimulus generalisation interpretations of the easy-to-hard effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology24, 352–5.
