Vocal and Manual Response Latencies to Bilateral and Unilateral Tachistoscopic Letter Displays

Abstract

Bilateral rows of eight letters and unilateral rows of four letters were presented in randomized sequences for 100 ms. Subjects were required to recall all letters in a trial (Experiment I); recall letters from one hemifield cued at exposure (Experiment II); recognize a single letter, making a vocal response (Experiment III); recognize a single letter, making a manual response (Experiment IV). In Experiments I, II and III, identification errors were fewer and vocal response latencies were faster for RVF stimuli, except in the bilateral condition on Experiment I; in Experiment IV manual response latencies were the same, for left and right, bilateral and unilateral conditions. Collectively, the results could not be satisfactorily accounted for by any one hypothesis: report-order, trace-scanning, or cerebral dominance. The relative contribution of each process to the laterality effect was discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayres

J. J. B.

(1966). Some artifactual causes of perceptual primacy. Journal of Experimental Psychology 71, 896–901.

Douglas

(1968). Left-right differences and order of report in tachistoscopic recognition University of Auckland Unpublished MA thesis.

Filbey

R. A.

Gazzaniga

M. S.

(1969). Splitting the normal brain with reaction time. Psychonomic Science 17, 335–6.

Fitzgerald

R. E.

Marshall

A. J.

(1967). Left-right field differences with partial report of letters. American Journal of Psychology 80, 370–6.

Gazzaniga

M. S.

Sperry

R. W.

(1967). Language after section of the cerebral commissures. Brain 90, 131–48.

Geffen

Bradshaw

J. L.

Wallace

(1971). Interhemispheric effects on reaction time to verbal and nonverbal stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology 87, 415–22.

Heron

(1957). Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. American Journal of Psychology 70, 38–48.

McKeever

W. F.

Huling

M. D.

(1970). Left-cerebral hemisphere superiority in tachistoscopic word-recognition performances. Perceptual and Motor Skills 30, 763–6.

Mishkin

Forgays

D. G.

(1952). Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. Journal of Experimental Psychology 43, 43–8.

10.

Smith

M. C.

Ramunas

(1971). Elimination of visual field effects by use of a single report technique. Journal of Experimental Psychology 87, 23–8.

11.

White

M. J.

(1969a). Laterality differences in perception: A review. Psychological Bulletin 72, 387–405.

12.

White

M. J.

(1969b). Order of report and letter structure in tachistoscopic recognition. Psychonomic Science 17, 364–5.

13.

White

M. J.

(1969c). Visual field differences and the recognition of alphanumeric material. Australian Journal of Psychology 21, 311–7.

14.

White

M. J.

(1970). A signal-detection analysis of laterality differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology 83, 174–6.

15.

White

M. J.

(1971). Visual hemifield differences in the perception of letters and contour orientation. Canadian Journal of Psychology 25, 207–12.

16.

Winer

B. J.

(1962). Statistical Principles in Experimental Design New York: McGraw-Hill.