Recall of complex sentences at two retention intervals was examined, using sentences which varied simultaneously in three ways, being either active or passive, of low or high Yngve depth, and predictable or unpredictable. Recall of any particular sentence was cued with either the logical subject, logical object, verb or adverbial phrase noun. In general, unpredictable sentences were recollected better than predictable ones, low Yngve depth sentences were recalled better than high Yngve depth ones, and passive sentences were retained better than active ones. The most effective cue was the object, followed in turn by the subject and the adverbial phrase noun, with the verb being least effective. Implications of these findings are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. A. (1967). Human MemoryNew York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
AdamsJ. A.BrayN. W. (1970). A closed-loop theory of paired-associate verbal learning. Psychological Review77, 385–404.
3.
AmmonP. (1968). The perception of grammatical relations in sentences: A methodological exploration. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior7, 869–75.
4.
BeggI.PaivioA. (1969). Concreteness and imagery in sentence meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior8, 821–7.
5.
BitzerD. L.HicksB.JohnsonR.LymanE. R. (1967). The PLATO system: Current research and development. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics8, 64–70.
6.
BlumenthalA. L. (1967). Promoted recall of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior6, 203–6.
7.
BregmanA. S.StrasbergR. (1968). Memory for the syntactic form of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior7, 396–403.
8.
ClarkH. H.ClarkE. V. (1968). Semantic distinctions and memory for complex sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology20, 129–38.
9.
CoferC. N. (1941). A comparison of logical and verbatim learning of prose passages of different lengths. American Journal of Psychology54, 1–20.
10.
FillenbaumS. (1966). Memory for gist: some relevant variables. Language and Speech9, 217–27.
11.
GarrettM.BeverT. G.FodorJ. A. (1966). The active use of grammar in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics1, 30–2.
12.
GarrettM.FodorJ. A. (1968). Psychological theories and linguistic construction. Verbal Behavior and General Behavior TheoryDixonT. R.HortonD. L.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall451–77.
13.
JohnsonN. F. (1968). Sequential verbal behavior. Verbal Behavior and General Behavior TheoryDixonT. R.HortonD. L.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall421–50.
14.
Johnson-LairdP. N. (1968). The interpretation of the passive voice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology20, 69–73.
15.
KennedyR. A.WilkesA. L. (1968). Response times at different positions within a sentence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology20, 390–4.
16.
KennedyR. A.WilkesA. L. (1969). Analysis of storage and retrieval processes in memorizing simple sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology80, 396–8.
17.
KintschW. (1970). Learning, Memory and Conceptual ProcessesNew York: Wiley.
18.
MandlerG.MandlerJ. M. (1964). Serial position effects in sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior3, 195–202.
19.
MartinE. (1970). Toward an analysis of subjective phrase structure. Psychological Bulletin74, 153–66.
20.
MartinE.RobertsK. H. (1966). Grammatical factors in sentence retention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior5, 211–8.
21.
MartinE.RobertsK. H. (1967). Sentence length and sentence retention is the free learning situation. Psychonomic Science8, 535.
22.
MartinE.RobertsK. H.CollinsA. M. (1968). Short-term memory for sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior7, 560–6.
23.
PaivioA. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review76, 241–63.
24.
PaivioA. (1971). Imagery and deep structure in the recall of English nominalizations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior10, 1–12.
25.
PerfettiC. A. (1969). Sentence retention and the depth hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior8, 101–4.
26.
PerfettiC. A. (1969). Lexical density and phrase structure depth as variables in sentence retention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior8, 719–24.
27.
PerfettiC. A.GoodmanD. (1971). Memory for sentences and noun phrases of extreme depth. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology23, 22–33.
28.
RobertsK. H. (1968). The interaction of normative associations and grammatical factors in sentence retentionChicago Paper read at Midwestern Psychological Association meetings.
29.
RohrmanN. L. (1968). The role of syntactic structure in the recall of English nominalizations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior7, 904–12.
30.
RosenbergS. (1966). Recall of sentences as a function of syntactic and associative habit. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior5, 392–6.
31.
RosenbergS. (1968). Association and phrase structure in sentence recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior7, 1077–81.
32.
RubensteinH.AbornM. (1958). Learning, prediction and readability. Journal of Applied Psychology42, 28–32.
33.
SachsJ. S. (1967). Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics2, 437–42.
34.
SavinH. B.PerchonockE. (1965). Grammatical structure and the immediate recall of English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior4, 348–53.
35.
SlameckaN. J. (1964). Acquisition and retention of connected discourse. Journal of Experimental Psychology68, 330–3.
36.
WangM. D. (1970). The role of syntactic complexity as a determiner of comprehensibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior9, 398–404.
37.
WearingA. J. (1970). The storage of complex sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior9, 21–9.
38.
WearingA. J. (1971). Vividness and the recall of English nominalizations. Psychonomic Science22, 121–2.
39.
WearingA. J. (1971). On the Adams-Bray retrieval model. Journal of Experimental Psychology89, 96–101.
40.
WearingA. J.CrowderR. G. (1971). Dividing attention to study sentence acquisition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior10, 254–61.
41.
WeisbergR. W. (1969). Sentence processing assessed through intrasentence word associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology82, 332–8.
42.
WrightP. (1969). Two studies of the Depth Hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology60, 63–9.
43.
YngveV. H. (1960). A model and a hypothesis for language structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society104, 444–66.
