The effects of loud noise are examined by observing its influence upon a combined tracking and multi-source monitoring task. Tracking (the primary task) improves in noise, as does the detection of centrally located signals in the monitoring task. Peripheral signals are detected less often in noise. The data are interpreted in terms of increased selectivity of attention with arousal.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BahrickH. P.FittsP. M.RankinR. E. (1952). Effects of incentives upon reactions to peripheral stimuli. J. exp. Psychol.44, 400–6.
2.
BerlyneD. E.LewisJ. L. (1963). Effects of heightened arousal on human exploratory behaviour. Can. J. Psychol.17, 398–411.
3.
BroadbentD. E. (1951). The twenty dials test and the twenty lights test under noise MRC/APRU res. rep. 160–51.
4.
BroadbentD. E. (1954). Some effects of noise on visual performance. Q. Jl exp. Psychol.6, 1–5.
5.
BroadbentD. E.GregoryM. (1963). Vigilance considered as a statistical decision. Br. J. Psychol.54, 309–23.
6.
BroadbentD. E.GregoryM. (1965). Effects of noise and signal rate upon vigilance analysed by means of decision theory. Human Factors7, 155–62.
7.
BursillA. E. (1958). The restriction of peripheral vision during exposure to hot and human conditions. Q. Jl exp. Psychol.10, 113–29.
8.
CallowayE.StoneG. (1960). Re-evaluating focus of attention. Drugs and BehaviourUhrL.MillerJ. G.New York: Wiley.
9.
CorcoranD. W. J. (1962). Noise of loss of sleep. Q. Jl exp. Psychol.14, 178–82.
10.
CorcoranD. W. J. (1963). Individual differences in the effects of loss of sleepUniversity of Cambridge Ph.D. thesis.
11.
DaviesD. R.HockeyG. R. J. (1966). The effects of noise and doubling the signal frequency on individual differences in visual vigilance performance. Br. J. Psychol.57, 381–9.
12.
DuffyE. (1962). Activation and BehaviourNew York: Wiley.
13.
EasterbrookJ. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organisation of behaviour. Psychol. Rev.66, 183–201.
14.
HebbD. O. (1955). Drives and the CNS (Conceptual Nervous System). Psychol. Rev.62, 243–54.
15.
HelperH. M. (1957). The effects of noise on work output and physiological activation AMRL tech. rep. 270.
16.
HockeyG. R. J. (1969). Environmental stress and attention to complex visual displaysUniv. Cambridge Ph.D. thesis.
17.
JerisonH. J. (1957). Performance on a simple vigilance task in noise and quiet. J. acoust. Soc. Am.29, 1163–5.
18.
JerisonH. J. (1959). Effects of noise on human performance. J. appl. Psychol.43, 96–101.
19.
KirkR. E.HechtE. (1963). Maintenance of vigilance by programmed noise. Percept. Motor Skills16, 553–60.
20.
LeonardJ. A. (1959). Five-choice serial reaction apparatus MRC/APRU res. rep. 59–326.
21.
McGrathJ. J. (1960). The effects of environmental stimulation on vigilance performance Los Angeles: Hum. Fact. Res. Inc., tech. rep. 6.
22.
McGrathJ. J. (1963). Irrelevant stimulation and vigilance performance. Vigilance: A SymposiumBucknerD. N.McGrathJ. J.New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
TarrièreC.WisnerA. (1962). Effets des bruits significats et non-significats au cours d'une épreuve de vigilance. Trav. Hum.25, 1–28.
24.
TecceJ. J.TarnellM. (1965). Focal and incidental movement time as a function of shock arousal in humans. J. Psychol.59, 155–8.
25.
WachtelP. (1967). Conceptions of broad and narrow attention. Psychol. Bull.68, 417–29.
26.
WeltmanG.EgstromG. H. (1966). Perceptual narrowing in novice divers. Human Factors8, 499–506.
27.
WilkinsonR. T. (1963). Interaction of noise with knowledge of results and sleep deprivation. J. exp. Psychol.66, 332–7.
28.
ZaffyD. J.BruningJ. L. (1966). Drive and the range of cue utilization. J. exp. Psychol.71, 382–4.
