The experiment was designed in an attempt to throw some light on certain anomalies connected with the assessment of pain threshold by the Limiting Method. It is argued that an anchoring effect, similar to that described by Helson (1947), accounts for the low pain threshold values found when a small stimulus-interval is used.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GrindleyG. C. (1936). The variation of sensory thresholds with the rate of application of the stimulus. I. The differential threshold for pressure. II. Touch and pain. Brit. J. Psychol.27, 86–95189–95.
2.
HardyJ. D.WolffH. G.GoodellH. (1952). Pain Senstaions and ReactionsBaltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
3.
HaslamD. R. (1965). The influence of stimulus scale-interval upon the assessment of pain threshold. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.17, 65–8.
4.
HaslamD. R.ThomasE. A. C. (1967). An optimum interval in the assessment of pain threshold. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.19, 54–8.
5.
HelsonH. (1947). Adaptation-level as a frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data. Amer. J. Psychol.60, 1–29.
6.
SiegelS. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural SciencesNew York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
SmithR. (1966). The use of pressure and chemical stimulation to investigate pain. Supplement Proc. Roy. Soc. Med.59, 73–8.
8.
ThomasE. A. C. (1966). On determining pain thresholds using the limiting method. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.18, 270–2.
