Requiring a subject to say a redundant prefix before he recalls a sequence of digits impairs his ability to recall that sequence. Evidence reported below suggests that the prefix functions exactly as an extra nonredundant digit—that the subject performs exactly as if the prefix had to be learned anew on each trial.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonN. S. (1960). Post-stimulus cueing in immediate memory. J. exp. Psychol.60, 216–21.
2.
ConradR. (1958). Accuracy of recall using keyset and telephone dial and the effect of a prefix digit. J. appl. Psychol.42, 285–8.
3.
ConradR. (1960). Very brief delay of immediate recall. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.12, 45–7.
4.
DallettK. M. (1964). Effects of a redundant prefix on immediate recall. J. exp. Psychol.67, 296–8.
5.
HoweM. J. A. (1965). Intralist differences in short-term memory. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.17, 338–42.
6.
PetersonL. R.PetersonM. V. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. J. exp. Psychol.58, 193–8.
7.
WickelgrenW. A. (1964). Size of rehearsal group and short-term memory. J. exp. Psychol.68, 413–9.
