The pseudo-recognition technique provides an ingenious method of evaluating the influence of response biasing variables. This study tests the effects of recency on low and medium frequency words using the pseudo-recognition procedure. It was found that under short recency conditions the thresholds of medium and low frequency words did not differ, while under longer recency conditions the low frequency words had significantly lower thresholds than medium frequency words.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerlyneD. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal and CuriosityNew York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
BrownJ. (1955). An Experimental Study of Immediate MemoryCambridge University Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
3.
GoldiamondI.HawkinsW. F. (1958). Vexierversuch: the log relationship between word frequency and recognition obtained in the absence of stimulus words. J. exp. Psychol.56, 457–63.
4.
HovlandC. I. (1951). Human learning and attention. Handbook of Experimental PsychologyStevensS. S.New York: Wiley613–89.
5.
NeisserU. (1954). An experimental distinction between perceptual process and verbal response. J. exp. Psychol.47, 399–402.
6.
NewbiggingP. L. (1960). Personal values and response strength of value-related words as a measure in a pseudo-perceptual task. Canad. J. Psychol.14, 38–44.
7.
NobleC. E. (1963). Meaningfulness and familiarity. Verbal Behaviour and LearningCoferC. N.New York: McGraw-Hill76–119.
8.
PetersonL. R. (1966). Short term verbal memory and learning. Psychol. Rev.73, 143–207.
9.
PosnerM. I. (1965). Memory and thought in human intellectual performance. Brit. J. Psychol.56, 197–215.
10.
PosnerM. I. (1967). Short term memory systems in human information processing. Acta Psychologica27, 267–84.
11.
ThorndikeE. L.LorgeI. (1944). The Teacher's Word Book of 30,000 wordsNew York: Columbia Univ. Press.
12.
WinerB. J. (1962). Statistical Principles in Experimental DesignNew York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
ZajoncR. B.NieuwenhuyseB. (1964). Relationship between word frequency and recognition: perceptual process or response bias?. J. exp. Psychol.67, 276–85.
