Using stimulus material drawn from a single category, it is shown that formal recognition tests yield superior performance to recall when the category cannot be completely enumerated by the subjects, but not otherwise. Furthermore, within these categories recognition is superior only if unfamiliar items are selected as stimuli. These findings fit the theory that when recalling subjects attempt to scan the relevant category and “recognize” those items employed as stimuli.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DaleH. C. A. (1966). When recognition is no better than recall. Nature211, 324.
2.
DaleH. C. A. (1967). J. verb Learn. verb Behav Response availability and short term memory. (in the press).
3.
DaleH. C. A.BaddeleyA. D. (1966). Remembering a list of two-digit numbers. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.18, 212–9.
4.
DavisR.SutherlandN. S.JuddB. R. (1961). Information content in recognition and recall. J. exp. Psychol.48, 422–9.
5.
PoultonE. C. (1957). Previous knowledge and memory. Brit. J. Psychol.48, 259–70.
6.
TulvingE. (1964). Intratrial and intertrial retention: notes towards a theory of free recall verbal learning. Psychol. Rev.71, 219–37.
7.
UnderwoodB. J.SchulzR. W. (1960). Meaningfulness and Verbal LearningNew York: J. B. Lippincott Co.