Abstract
A large number of subjects was required for a series of choice-reaction experiments. An ample supply of volunteer subjects was obtained without excessive trouble by sending a circular letter to every undergraduate in Trinity College, Cambridge. Several different types of circular were compared, but none of them proved any more effective than the others. A probabilistic model is developed which accounts adequately for the times times taken by the undergraduates to reply. The discussion following covers the implication of this model, and a technical reason why the different letters should appear equally effective.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
