Identification of Consonants and Vowels Presented to Left and Right Ears*

Abstract

The results of earlier studies by several authors suggest that speech and nonspeech auditory patterns are processed primarily in different places in the brain and perhaps by different modes. The question arises in studies of speech perception whether all phonetic elements or all features of phonetic elements are processed in the same way. The technique of dichotic presentation was used to examine this question.

The present study compared identifications of dichotically presented pairs of synthetic CV syllables and pairs of steady-state vowels. The results show a significant right-ear advantage for CV syllables but not for steady-state vowels. Evidence for analysis by feature in the perception of consonants is discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Broadbent

D. E.

(1954). The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. J. exp. Psychol. 47, 191–6.

Broadbent

D. E.

Gregory

(1964). Accuracy of recognition for speech presented to the right and left ears. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 16, 359–60.

Bryden

M. P.

(1963). Ear preference in auditory perception. J. exp. Psychol. 65, 103–5.

Chaney

R. B.

Webster

J. C.

(1965). Information in certain multidimensional acoustic signals. U.S. Navy Electronics Laboratory Reports, No. 1339 San Diego, Calif.

Conrad

(1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. Brit. J. Psychol. 55, 75–84.

Cooper

F. S.

Liberman

A. M.

Borst

J. M.

(1951). The interconversion of audible and visible patterns as a basis for research in the perception of speech. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 37, 318–28.

House

A. S.

Stevens

K. N.

Sandel

T. T.

Arnold

J. B.

(1962). On the learning of speechlike vocabularies. J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav. 1, 133–43.

Kimura

(1961a). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canad. J. Psychol. 15, 166–71.

Kimura

(1961b). Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Canad. J. Psychol. 15, 156–65.

10.

Kimura

(1964). Left-right differences in the perception of melodies. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 16, 355–8.

11.

Kozhevnikov

V. A.

Chistovich

L. A.

(1965). Rech' Artikuliatsia i Vospriiatie. Moscow-Leningrad. Tr. Speech: Articulation and Perception Washington, D.C.: Joint Publications Research Service 30JPRS:543.

12.

Liberman

A. M.

Copper

F. S.

Studdert-Kennedy

Harris

K. S.

Shankweiler

D. P.

(1966). Some observations on the efficiency of speech sounds. Proc. XVIII Intern. Congr. Psychol., Moscow in press.

13.

Miller

G. A.

Nicely

P. E.

(1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 27, 338–52.

14.

Milner

(1962). Laterality effects in audition. Interhemispheric relations and cerebral dominance Mountcastle

V. B.

Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.

15.

Rosenzweig

M. R.

(1951). Representations of the two ears at the auditory cortex. Amer. J. Physiol. 167, 147–58.

16.

Shankweiler

(1966). Effects of temporal-lobe damage on perception of dichotically presented melodies. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 62, 115–9.

17.

Wickelgren

W. A.

(1966). Distinctive features and errors in short-term memory for English consonants. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 39, 388–98.