Extinction of a Running Response as a Function of Reinforcement Magnitude

Abstract

Four groups of rats were trained on different sucrose solutions in a straight runway. Terminal running speed was a monotonic function of reinforcement magnitude. After training each group was subdivided, one subgroup being extinguished under spaced, the other under massed conditions. In spaced extinction the animals trained on non extreme reward magnitudes showed most resistance to extinction. It was concluded that resistance to extinction is an inverted U-shaped function of reinforcement magnitude found in training. The massed extinction trials were conducted with a very short inter-trial interval. The animals showed an immediate drop in running speed followed by a gradual recovery and a subsequent decline. The number of trials taken to reach the peak recovery speed was a function of reinforcement magnitude found in training. Results on both massed and spaced extinction trials were interpreted in terms of the facilitatory and inhibitory effects of momentary and conditioned frustration.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amsel

(1958). The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. Psychol. Bull. 55, 102–19.

Armus

H. L.

(1959). Effect of magnitude of reinforcement on acquisition and extinction of a running response. J. exp. Psychol. 58, 61–3.

Bower

G. H.

(1962). The influence of graded reductions in reward and prior frustrating events upon the magnitude of the frustrating effect. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 55, 582–7.

Collier

Myers

(1961). The loci of reinforcement. J. exp. Psychol. 61, 57–66.

Guttman

(1953). Operant conditioning, extinction, and periodic reinforcement in relation to concentration of sucrose used as reinforcing agent. J. exp. Psychol. 46, 213–24.

Hill

W. F.

Spear

N. E.

(1962). Resistance to extinction as a joint function of reward magnitude and the spacing of extinction trials. J. exp. Psychol. 64, 636–9.

Hulse

S. H.

(1958). Amount and percentage of reinforcement and duration of goal box confinement in conditioning and extinction. J. exp. Psychol. 56, 48–57.

Jonckheere

A. R.

(1954). A distribution-free k-sample test against ordered alternatives. Biometrika 41, 133–45.

Keller

F. S.

Schoenfield

W. N.

(1950). Principles of Psychology New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

10.

Kraeling

(1961). Analysis of amount of reward as a variable in learning. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 54, 560–5.

11.

Lawrence

D. H.

Festinger

(1962). Deterrents and Reinforcement. The Psychology of Insufficient Reward Stanford: Stanford University Press.

12.

Logan

F. A.

(1960). Incentive Yale University Press.

13.

Siegel

(1956). Nonparametric Statistics New York: McGraw-Hill.

14.

Stanley

W. C.

Rowe

M. I.

(1954). Extinction by omission of food as a function of goal box confinement. J. exp. Psychol. 48, 271–4.

15.

Wagner

A. R.

(1961). Effects of amount and percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials on conditioning and extinction. J. exp. Psychol. 62, 234–42.

16.

Weinstock

(1958). Acquisition and extinction of a partially reinforced running response at a 24-hour intertrial interval. J. exp. Psychol. 56, 151–8.

17.

Young

P. T.

Shuford

E. H.

Jr. (1955). Quantitative control of motivation through sucrose solutions of different concentrations. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 48, 114–8.