Remembering a List of Two-digit Numbers

Abstract

The way subjects remember a list of two-digit numbers has been examined in some detail. It is found that intrusions in free recall are not random. They resemble omissions in having the same first digit but not in other ways. This non-randomness of recall errors has been used to construct recognition tests of varying difficulty. Numbers which occurred commonly as intrusions were difficult to distinguish from the correct items when used as distractors in recognition tests. The experiments suggest that the previously observed relationship between recognition efficiency and number of alternatives (Davis, Sutherland and Judd, 1961) can be attributed to the increased probability that such intrusions will be included when the total number of distractors is increased.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown

J. D.

(1959). Information, redundancy and decay of the memory trace. Mechanisation of Thought Processes. Nat. Physical Lab. Symp. No. 10 London: HMSO.

Conrad

(1964a). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span. Brit. J. Psychol. 55, 429–32.

Conrad

(1964b). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. Brit. J. Psychol. 55, 75–84.

Dale

H. C. A.

Baddeley

A. D.

(1962). Alternatives in testing recognition memory. Nature 196, 93–4.

Davis

Sutherland

N. S.

Judd

B. R.

(1961). Information content in recognition and recall. J. exp. Psychol. 61, 422–9.

Stone

(1960). An extension of the chi-squared test for randomness. Brit. J. stat. Psychol. 13, 31–2.

Wickelgren

W. A.

(1965). Similarity and intrusions in short term memory for consonant-vowel digrams. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 17, 241–7.