Susceptibility to the Müller-Lyer Illusion and its Relationship to Differences in Size Constancy

Abstract

The hypothesis that susceptibility to the Müller-Lyer illusion is the result of normal constancy scaling, misapplied, was submitted to direct test. No significant correlations between illusion error and size constancy estimates were obtained. Also invalidated were hypotheses that under-constancy is correlated with non-susceptibility to the illusion, and that over-constancy is correlated with greater illusion error. The results suggest that an approach to the explanation of illusion effects by means of analysing individual differences in size constancy, in intelligence and preferred “perceptual style,” might be fruitful. Some tentative suggestions are made concerning the role of perceptual inference, abstraction and analysing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Crookes

R. G.

(1957). Size constancy and literalness in the Rorschach test. Brit. J. med. Psychol. 30, 99–106.

Gardner

R. W.

(1961). Cognitive controls of attention deployment as determinants of visual illusions. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol. 62, 120–7.

Gregory

R. L.

(1963). Distortion of visual space as inappropriate constancy scaling. Nature 199, 678–80.

Gregory

R. L.

(1964a). Illusory perception as a constancy phenomenon. Nature 204, 302–3.

Gregory

R. L.

(1964b). Human perception. In. Experimental Psychology: Brit. Med. Bull. 20, 21–6.

Gregory

R. L.

(1965). Depth in seeing. Nature 207, 16–9.

Hamilton

(1963). Size constancy and cue responsiveness in psychosis. Brit. J. Psychol. 54, 25–39.

Hamilton

(1965). Size constancy in normals and schizophrenics. Size constancy and the Müller-Lyer illusion in stages of cognitive development Ittelson

W. H.

Kutash

S. B.

New Brunswick, N.J. Paper to the Experimental Psychology Society Meeting in Reading.

Joynson

R. B.

(1958a). An experimental synthesis of the associationist and Gestalt accounts of the perception of size. Part I. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 10, 65–76.

10.

Joynson

R. B.

(1958b). An experimental synthesis of the associationist and Gestalt accounts of the perception of size. Part II. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 10, 142–54.

11.

Oyama

(1960). Japanese studies on the so-called geometrical-optical illusions. Psychologia 3, 7–20.

12.

Perry

(1961). Perceptual Changes in Psychopathology.

13.

Raush

H. L.

(1952). Perceptual constancy in schizophrenia. J. Personal. 21, 176–87.

14.

Rump

E. E.

(1961). The relationship between perceived size and perceived distance. Brit. J. Psychol. 52, 111–24.

15.

Tausch

(1954). Optische Täuschungen als artifizielle Effekte der Gestaltungsprozesse von Grössen-und Formenkonstanz in der natürlichen Raumwahrnehmung. Psychol. Forsch. 24, 299–348.

16.

Tausch

(1955). Nichtbewusste (sog. unbewusste) Vorgänge bei der optischen Grössenwahrnehmung von Gegenständen. Psychol. Forsch. 25, 28–64.

17.

Thouless

R. H.

(1931a). Phenomenal regression to the real object. I. Brit. J. Psychol. 21, 339–59.

18.

Thouless

R. H.

(1931b). Phenomenal regression to the real object. II. Brit. J. Psychol. 22, 1–30.

19.

Thouless

R. H.

(1932). Individual differences in phenomenal regression. Brit. J. Psychol. 22, 216–41.

20.

Thurstone

L. L.

(1944). A Factorial Study of Perception. Chicago.

21.

Vernon

M. D.

(1952). A Further Study of Visual Perception. Cambridge: University Press.