Social predictors of non-attendance in an urban mammographic screening programme: A multilevel analysis

Abstract

Objective: Rate of non-attendance following invitation for breast cancer screening is related to several socioeconomic conditions. To what extent this reflects differences with regard to individual and environmental circumstances, respectively, has received little attention. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of individual socioeconomic and area-level determinants on variations in non-attendance among geographic areas in an urban mammographic service screening programme. Methods: The study population consisted of 32,119 women invited for mammographic screening in 1990—93, residing in 97 neighbourhoods in the city of Malmö in Sweden. The influence of the individual factors age, marital status, education, housing accommodation, household income, and area-level circumstances, e.g. rate of migration and rate of being gainfully employed, on the rate of non-attendance was assessed by multilevel analysis. Results: Area rates of non-attendance ranged from 18% to 63%. Of the total variability in non-attendance, 4.3% was between neighbourhoods. This effect was significantly reduced when adjusting for the individual factors. The area-level factors, migration, and rate of being gainfully employed reduced and almost erased the neighbourhood variance in non-attendance. Conclusion: In addition to individual socioeconomic factors, area-level factors seem to be important determinants of neighbourhood rates of non-attendance in an urban mammographic screening programme. In a public health perspective neighbourhoods may be targeted in order to affect the problem of non-attendance in mammographic screening.

Keywords

Attendance mammographic screening multilevel non-attendance neighbourhoods socioeconomic factors

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Matson S. , Andersson I. , Berglund G. , Janzon L. , Manjer J. Non-attendance in mammographic screening: A study of intra-urban differences from the city of Malmö in Sweden 1990—94. Cancer Detect Prev 2001;25:132—7.

Banks E. , Beral V. , Cameron R. , Hogg A. , Langley N. , Barnes I. , et al. Comparison of various characteristics of women who do and do not attend for breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Res 2002;4:R1.

Wells BL , Horm JW Targeting the underserved for breast and cervical cancer screening: The utility of ecological analysis using the National Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health 1998;88:1484—9.

Maheswaran R. , Pearson T. , Jordan H. , Black D. Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006 Mar;60:208—12.

Van der PM , Cairns J. Assessing the resource implications of extending routine invitation to breast screening to women aged 65—67 years. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:1790—6.

Zackrisson S. , Andersson I. , Manjer J. , Janzon L. Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavourable socio-economic circumstances and advanced carcinoma. Int J Cancer 2004 Feb 20;108:754—60.

Lagerlund M. , Maxwell AE , Bastani R. , Thurfjell E. , Ekbom A. , Lambe M. Sociodemographic predictors of non-attendance at invitational mammography screening: A population-based register study (Sweden) . Cancer Causes Control 2002;13:73—82.

Aro AR , de Konig HJ , Absetz P. , Schreck M. Psychosocial predictors of first attendance for organised mammography screening. J Med Screen 1999;6:82—8.

Lagerlund M. , Hedin A. , Sparén P. , Thurfjell E. , Lambe M. Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge as predictors of nonattendance in a Swedish population-based mammography screening program . Prev Med 2000 ;31:417—28.

10.

Kawachi IBL. Social cohesion, social capital, and health . In: Berkman L , Kawachi I , editors. Social epidemiology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p 174—90.

11.

Coleman J. Foundations of social theory. Princeton, NJ: Harvard University Press; 1990.

12.

Putnam RD Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1993.

13.

Kawachi I. , Kennedy BP , Glass R. Social capital and self-rated health: A contextual analysis. Am J Public Health 1999;89:1187—93.

14.

Putnam RD Bowling alone: America's declining social capital . J Democracy 1995;6:65—78.

15.

Lindstrom M. , Moghaddassi M. , Merlo J. Social capital and leisure time physical activity: A population based multilevel analysis in Malmo, Sweden . J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:23—8.

16.

Putnam RD Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2000.

17.

Axen E. , Lindstrom M.

Ethnic differences in self-reported lack of access to a regular doctor: A population-based study. Ethn

Health 2002 ;7:195—207.

18.

Malmstrom M. , Sundquist J. , Johansson SE Neighborhood environment and self-reported health status: A multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health 1999;89:1181—6.

19.

Andersson I. , Aspegren K. , Janzon L. , Landberg T. , Lindholm K. , Linell F. , et al. Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: The Malmö mammographic screening trial. Br Med J 1988;297:943—8.

20.

Snijders TAB , Busker RJ Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling . London: Sage Publications; 1999.

21.

Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. London: Edward Arnold; 1995.

22.

Rasbash J. , Browne W. , Goldstein H. , Yang M. , Plewis I. , Healy M. , et al. A user's guide to MLwiN. London: Institute of Education, University of London; 2002.

23.

Rosenberg L. , Wise LA , Palmer JR , Horton NJ , ms-Campbell LL A multilevel study of socioeconomic predictors of regular mammography use among African-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005 ;14(11 Pt 1):2628—33.

24.

Kothari AR , Birch S. Individual and regional determinants of mammography uptake. Can J Public Health 2004;95:290—4.

25.

O'Byrne AM , Kavanagh AM , Ugoni A. , Diver F. Predictors of non-attendance for second round mammography in an Australian mammographic screening programme . J Med Screen 2000;7:190—4.

26.

Scaf-Klomp W. , van Sonderen FLP , Stewart R. , van Dijck JAAM , van den Heuvel WJA. Compliance after 17 years of breast cancer screening . J Med Screen 1995;2:195—9.

27.

IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention : Breast Cancer Screening. Lyon, France: IARCPress; 2002.

28.

Lindstrom M. , Merlo J. , Ostergren PO Social capital and sense of insecurity in the neighbourhood: A population-based multilevel analysis in Malmo, Sweden . Soc Sci Med 2003;56:1111—20.

29.

Lindstrom M. , Merlo J. , Ostergren PO Individual and neighbourhood determinants of social participation and social capital: A multilevel analysis of the city of Malmo, Sweden. Soc Sci Med 2002;54:1779—91.

30.

Commission of the European Communities , European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening . 3rd ed, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2001.