Aim: This article aims to review current knowledge concerning the cost-effectiveness of healthcare-based interventions aimed at improving physical activity. Method: A search was performed for economic evaluations containing the terms ``physical activity'', ``exercise'', or ``fitness''. Cost-effectiveness for the articles found was described based on a model for evaluating interventions intended to promote physical activity. Results: A total of 26 articles were found in the search. Nine of them concern a general population, 7 evaluated older people, and 10 studied disease-specific populations. A preventive perspective is most common, but some have a treatment perspective. Around 20 of the interventions studied were cost-effective according to their authors, but all analyses had some shortcomings in their evaluation methods. Conclusion: This review found many examples of cost-effective interventions. There is a lack of evidence for the cost-effectiveness of interventions aimed at those whose only risk factor for illness is a sedentary lifestyle. There is more evidence, although it is limited, for the cost-effectiveness of interventions aimed at high-risk groups or those who manifest poor health related to physical inactivity. Most of the evidence for cost-effectiveness is for older people and those with heart failure. Promotion of physical activity can be cost-effective with different methods and in different settings, but there remains a lack of evidence for specific methods in specific populations.
UK Department of Health.At least five a week: Evidence on the impact of physical activity and its relationship to health: UK Department of Health. A report from the Chief Medical Officer; 2004.
2.
US Department of Health and Human Services.Physical activity and health: a report of the Surgeon General ; 1996:1—264.
3.
Blair SN, Kohl III HW, Paffenbarger RS, Clark DO, Cooper KH, Gibbons LWPhysical fitness and all-cause mortality. JAMA1989;262:2395—401.
4.
Rejeski WJ , Brawley LR, Shumaker SAPhysical activity and health-related quality of life. Exercise Sports Sci Rev1996;24:71—108.
5.
WHO.World Health Report 2002. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
6.
Powell KE, Blair SNThe public health burden of sedentary living habits: theoretical but realistic estimates. Med Sci Sports1994;26:851—6.
7.
Colditz GAEconomic costs of obesity and inactivity. Med Sci Sports Exercise1999;31:S663—667.
8.
Katzmarzyk PPThe economic burden of physical inactivity in Canada. Can Med Assoc J2000;28:1435—40.
9.
Hagberg LA , Lindholm L.Is promotion of physical activity a wise use of societal resources? Issues of cost-effectiveness and equity in health. Scand J Med Sci Sports2005:304—12.
10.
Marcus BH , Forsyth LH, Stone EJ, Dubbert PM, McKenzie TL, Dunn AL, Blair SNPhysical activity behavior change: Issues in adoption and maintenance. Health Psychol2000;19:32—41.
11.
Prochaska JO , Marcus BHThe Transtheoretical Model: Application to exercise. In: Dishman RK, editor. Advances in exercise adherence . Champaign, IL : Human Kinetics ; 1994.
12.
Drummond MF , O'Brien B., Stoddart GL, Torrance GWMethods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford : Oxford University Press; 1997.
13.
Dzator JA , Hendrie D., Burke V., Gianguilio N., Gillam HF, Beilin LJ, Houghton S.A randomized trial of interactive group sessions achieved greater improvements in nutrition and physical activity at a tiny increase in cost. J Clin Epidemiol2004;57:610—9.
14.
Finkelstein EA , Troped PJ, Will JC, Palombo R.Cost-effectiveness of a cardiovascular disease risk reduction program aimed at financially vulnerable women: The Massachusetts WISEWOMAN project. J Women's Health Gend Based Med2002;11:519—26.
15.
Hatziandreu EI , Koplan JP, Weinstein MC, Caspersen CJ, Warner KEA cost-effectiveness analysis of exercise as a health promotion activity. Am J Public Health1988;78:1417—21.
16.
Jones TF, Eaton CBCost-benefit analysis of walking to prevent coronary heart disease . Arch Family Med1994;3:703—10.
17.
Shi L.A cost-benefit analysis of a California count's back injury prevention program . Public Health Rep1993;108: 204—11.
18.
Lindgren P., Fahlstadius P., Hellenius ML, Jónsson B., de Faire U.Cost-effectiveness of primary prevention of coronary heart disease through risk factor intervention in 60-year-old men from the county of Stockholm — a stochastic model of exercise and dietary advice. Prev Med2003 ;36:403—9.
19.
Sevick MA , Dunn AL, Morrow MS, Marcus BH, Chen GJ, Blair SNCost-effectiveness of lifestyle and structured exercise intervention in sedentary adults. Am J Prev Med2000;19:1—8.
20.
Sims J., Huang N., Pietsch J., Naccarella L.The Victorian Active Script Programme: promising signs for general practitioners, population health, and the promotion of physical activity. Br J Sports Med2004;38:19—25.
21.
Stevens W. , Hillsdon M., Thorogood M., McArdle D.Cost-effectiveness of a primary care based physical activity intervention in 45—74 year old men and women: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med1998;32:236—241.
22.
Ackermann RT, Cheadle A., Sandhu N., Madsen L., Wagner EH, LoGerfo JPCommunity exercise program use and changes in healthcare costs for older adults. Am J Prev Med2003;25:232—7.
23.
Leigh JP, Richardson N., Beck R., Kerr C., Harrington H., Parcell CL, Fries JFRandomized controlled study of a retiree health promotion program: The Bank of America Study. Arch Intern Med1992;152:1201—6.
24.
Leveille SG, Wagner EH, Davis C., Grothaus L., Wallace J., LoGerfo M., Kent D.Preventing disability and managing chronic illness in frail older adults: a randomized trial of a community-based partnership with primary care. J Am Geriatr Soc1998;46:1191—8.
25.
Munro J., Brazier J., Davey R., Nicholl J.Physical activity for the over-65s: Could it be a cost-effective exercise for the NHS?J Public Health Med1997;19:397—402.
26.
Robertson MC, Devlin N., Gardner MM, Campell AJEffectiveness and economic evaluation of a nurse delivered home exercise programme to prevent falls, 1: Randomised controlled trial. Br Med J2001;322:697—700.
27.
Robertson MC, Gardner MM, Devlin N., McGee R., Campell J.Effectiveness and economic evaluation of a nurse delivered home exercise programme to prevent falls, 2: Controlled trial in multiple centres. Br Med J2001;322:701—4.
28.
Wilson CJ , Datta KDTai chi for prevention of fractures in a nursing home population: An economic analysis. J Clin Outcomes Management2001;8:19—27.
29.
Georgiou D., Chen Y., Appadoo S., Belardinelli R., Greene R., Parides MK, Glied S.Cost-effectiveness analysis of long-term moderate exercise training in chronic heart failure . Am J Cardiol2001;87:984—8; A4.
Lowensteyn I., Coupal L., Zowall H., Grover SAThe cost-effectiveness of exercise training for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. J Cardiopulmonary Rehabil2000;20:147—55.
32.
Oldridge N., Furlong WJ, Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Guyatt G., Crowe J., Jones N.Economic evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation soon after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol1993;72:154—161.
33.
Ginsberg GM, Viskoper JR, Fuchs Z., Drexler I., Lubin F., Berlin S., Nitzan H., Zulty L., Chetrit A., Bregman L., et al. Partial cost-benefit analysis of two different models of nonpharmacological control of hypertension in the community . J Hum Hypertens1993;7:593—7.
34.
Johannesson M., Åberg H., Agreus L., Borgquist L., Jönsson B.Cost-benefit analysis of non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension. J Intern Med1991 ;230:307—12.
35.
McCarthy CJ, Mills PM, Pullen R., Richardson G., Hawkins N., Roberts CR, Silman AJ, Oldham JASupplementation of a home-based exercise programme with a class-based programme for people with osteoarthritis of the knees: a randomised controlled trial and health economic analysis. Health Technol Assess2004;8:1—76.
36.
Sevick MA , Bradham DD, Muender M., Chen GJ, Enarson C., Dailey M., Ettinger , WHJr.Cost-effectiveness of aerobic and resistance exercise in seniors with knee osteoarthritis. Med Sci Sports Exerc2000;32:1534—40.
37.
Kaplan RM , Atkins CJ, Wilkin DKThe cost-utility of diet and exercise interventions in non-insulin-independent diabetes mellitus . Health Promotion1988;2:331—340.
38.
The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group.Within-trial cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention or metformin for the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care2003;26:2518—23.
