Aims: The authors examined causes of death contributing to the relatively high mortality of Danish women born 1915—45, and evaluated the impact of smoking related causes of death. Methods: Age—period—cohort analysis of mortality of Danish women aged 40—89 in 1960—98. Estimate of the negative curvature in parabola patterns for 50 causes of death. Results: A total of 34 causes of death contributed to the relatively high mortality for women born 1915—45. The main contribution came from smoking-related causes of death. Conclusion: The results indicate a high smoking prevalence to be the main explanation behind the relatively low life expectancy of Danish women born 1915—45.
World Health Organisation.World Health Report 2004. Geneva, World Health Organisation; 2004.
2.
Sundhedsministeriet.Levetiden i Danmark. Copenhagen: Sundhedsministeriet ; 1994.
3.
Sundhedsministeriet.Danskernes dødelighed i 1990'erne. Copenhagen: Sundhedsministeriet; 1998.
4.
Juel K.Increased mortality among Danish women: Population based register study. Br Med J2000;321:349—50.
5.
Holford TRThe estimation of age, period and cohort effects for vital rates. Biometrics1983;39:311—24.
6.
Jacobsen R. , Keiding N., Lynge E.Long term mortality trends behind low life expectancy of Danish women. J Epidemiol Community Health2002;56:205—8.
7.
Juel K., Helweg-Larsen K.The Danish register of cause of death. Dan Med Bull1999;46:354—7.
8.
Danmarks Statistik.Befolkningens bevægelser 1961—2002. København: Danmarks Statistik; 2002.
9.
Borlander A.Classification of causes of death in Swedish statistics. Stockholm: National Central Bureau of Statistics; 1973.
10.
National Board of Health.Nye tal fra Sundhedsstyrelsen; 6: 20—1. København : National Board of Health; 2001 .
11.
Smoking-Attributable Mortality, Morbidity, and Economic Costs (SAMMEC): Adult SAMMEC and Maternal and Child Health (MCH) SAMMEC software, 2002c. Atlanta, GA : Centres for Disease Control; 2002 .
12.
Doll R., Peto R., Wheatley K., Gray R., Sutherland I.Mortality in relation to smoking: 40 years' observations on male British doctors . Br Med J1994;309:901—11.
13.
Doll R.Uncovering the effects of smoking: Historical perspective. Stat Methods Med Res1998;7:87—117.
14.
National Cancer Institute.Changes in Cigarette-related disease risks and their implications for prevention and control. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph 8. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 1997.
15.
Breslow NE , Day NEStatistical methods in cancer research, Vol. II: The design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC Sci Publ , (82):1987:1—406.
16.
Osler M.Smoking habits in Denmark from 1953 to 1991: A comparative analysis of results from three nationwide health surveys among adult Danes in 1953—1954, 1986—1987 and 1990—1991. Int J Epidemiol1992;21:862—71.
17.
Lynge E., Jensen OMCohort trends in incidence of cervical cancer in Denmark in relation to gonorrheal infection. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand1985;64:291—6.
