Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Aims: To explore elderly Danish women's ideas about osteoporosis and the possible threat to health. The authors discuss the issue of risk interpretations in itself, using osteoporosis as a case. Methods: A qualitative study based on material from focus-group discussions. Twenty-two 60- to 61-year-old healthy women were selected on the basis of questionnaire answers. Analysis was based on a meaning-centred approach. Results: Comprehension of osteoporosis was mainly based on images representing various dimensions of osteoporosis. The women drew on experiences with relatives, friends, and health information. Physical appearance seemed to be the most common way of assessing those who had osteoporosis or who might have it in the future. Women's ideas about osteoporosis were influenced by two main, parallel stereotypes of knowledge based on models of ageing with bodily decay and the threat of a preventable disease. They seemed to vacillate, often integrating elements from both models in their comprehension. The scenarios for women with or liable to develop osteoporosis as a disease appeared to be founded on worst-case scenarios. Conclusion: It is suggested that health professionals pay greater attention to people's models and images of risk conditions and carefully decide which images they wish to promote. Health education regarding osteoporosis comprises an ethical obligation to avert the construction of the more extreme and anxiety-producing prototypes. This is especially important when informing individuals about risk and prevention and when decisions on screenings and other medical examinations are made.

Keywords

Health education lay comprehension osteoporosis qualitative research risk perception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Getz L. , Sigurdsson JA , Hetlevik I.

Is opportunistic disease prevention in the consultation ethically justifiable?

Br Med J 2003;327:498—500.

Edwards A. , Elwyn G. , Mulley A. Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. Br Med J 2002;324:827—30.

Reventlow S. , Hvas AC , Tulinius C. ``In really great danger…'': The concept of risk in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 2001;19:71—5.

Fox CR , Irwin JR The role of context in the communication of uncertain beliefs. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 1998;20:57—70.

WHO Study Group Assessment of Fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis . 843rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1994.

Munck A. , Krølner B. , Noe-Nygaard E. , Grinsted P. , Mosekilde L. , Hahn-Pedersen S. , et al. Klinisk vejledning. Osteoporose i almen praksis med fokus på forebyggelse af frakturer hos ældre [Clinical guideline. Osteoporosis in general practice with focus on prevention of fractures among the elderly]. København: DSAM/TPL, 2002.

Lupton D. Risk. 1st ed. London: Routledge, 1999.

Magnus JH , Joakimsen RM , Berntsen GK , Tollan A. , Søgaard AJ

What do Norwegian women and men know about osteoporosis?

Osteoporosis Int 1996;6:31—6.

Backett-Milburn K. , Parry O. , Mauthner N. ``I'll worry about that when it comes along'': Osteoporosis, a meaningful issue for women at mid-life? Health Educ Res 2000;15:153—62.

10.

Hvas L. , Reventlow S. , Jensen HL , Malterud K.

Awareness of risk of osteoporosis may cause uncertainty and worry in menopausal women. Scand

J Public Health 2005;33:203—207.

11.

Green E. , Thompson D. , Griffiths F. Narratives of risk: Women at midlife, medical ``experts'' and health technologies . Health, Risk & Society 2002;4:273—86.

12.

Ballard K. Understanding risk: Women's perceived risk of menopause-related disease and the value they place on preventive hormone replacement therapy. Fam Pract 2002;19:591—5.

13.

Walter FM , Britten N. Patients' understanding of risk: A qualitative study of decision-making about the menopause and hormone replacement therapy in general practice. Fam Pract 2002;19:579—86.

14.

Davison C. , Smith GD , Frankel S. Lay epidemiology and the prevention paradox: The implications of coronary candidacy for health education. Sociology of health & illness 1991;13:1—19.

15.

Helman CG Culture, health and illness. 4rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 2000 .

16.

Quinn N. , Holland D. Culture and cognition. In: Holland D , Quinn N , editors. Cultural models in language and thought. 1st ed. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1987 .

17.

Strauss C. Models and motives. In: D'Andrade RG, Strauss C , editors. Human motives and cultural models . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

18.

Kleinman A. Patients and healers in the context of culture. 1st ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.

19.

Good BJ Medicine, rationality, and experience: An anthropological perspective. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

20.

Kitzinger J. , Barbour RS Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. In: Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage Publications, 1999.

21.

Drivsholm T. , Ibsen H. , Schroll M. , Davidsen M. , Borch-Johnsen K. Increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance among 60-year-old Danes. Diabet Med 2001;18:126—32.

22.

Brown JB The use of focus groups in clinical research. In: Crabtree BF , Miller WL , editors. Doing qualitative research. London: Sage Publications, 1999.

23.

Malterud K. Shared understanding of the qualitative research process: Guidelines for the medical researcher. Fam Pract 1993;10:201—6.

24.

Reventlow S. , Tulinius C. The doctor as focus group moderator — shifting roles and negotiating positions in health research. Family Practice 2005;22:335—340.

25.

Million Women Study Collaborators. Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 2003;362:419—27.

26.

Reventlow S. From accident to diagnosis: Cultural response to the risk of osteoporosis. In: AM Rivista della Societá Italiana di antropologia medica. Themes in Medical Anthropology. Argo, 2002.

27.

Martin AR , Holmes R. , Lydick E. Fears, knowledge, and perceptions of osteoporosis among women. Drug Information J 1997;31:301—6.

28.

Forbes WF , Hirdes JP The relationship between aging and disease: Geriatric ideology and myths of senility. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41:1267—71.

29.

Kanis JA , Johnell O. , Oden A. , Dawson A. , de Laet C. , Jonsson B. Ten year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds. Osteoporosis Int 2001;12:989—95.

30.

Foucault M. The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. London: Tavistock, 1973.

Brittle bones: Ageing or threat of disease Exploring women's cultural models of osteoporosis

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References