The state of scientific publishing: problems and promise

Horton R. 21st-century biomedical journals: failures and futures. Lancet 2003; 362: 1510-12.

Association of Research Libraries. Table 2. Monograph and Serials Costs in ARL Libraries, 1986-2002: Median Values for Time-Series Trends [available at: http://www.arl.org/stats/arlstat/graphs/2002/2002t2.html , accessed 7 December 2003].

Reed Elsevier . Operating and financial review: science and medical, interim statement 2003 [available at: http://www.investis.com/r-e/investor/accounts/2003-interim/revops03.html, accessed 7 December 2003].

Tamber PS BMC News and Views [serial online] 2000 Oct 3; 1:1. [cited 9 December 2003; available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-8219/1/1 ].

Association of College Research Libraries (ACRL). Principles and strategies for the reform of scholarly communication . The Association; 2003. [available at: http://www.ala.org/Content/NavigationMenu/ACRL/Publications/White_Papers_and_Reports/Principles_and_Strategies_for_the_Reform_of_Scholarly_Communication.htm, accessed 7 December 2003].

Open Society Institute. A guide to institutional repository software, 1st ed. The Institute; Oct 2003 [available at: http://www.soros.org/openaccess/software/OSI_Guide_to_Institutional_Repository_Software_v1/css/OSI_Guide_to_Institutional_Repository_Software_v1_10.htm , accessed 12 December 2003].

Brown PO , Eisen MB , Varmus HE Why PLoS became a publisher. PLoS Biology 2003; 1: 1 - 2.

Wellcome Trust. Scientific publishing: a position statement by the Wellcome Trust in support of open access publishing. The Trust; 2003 [available at: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/en/1/awtvispolpub.html , accessed 30 September 2003].

Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing Released 20 June 2003 [available at: http://www.earlham.edu/∼peters/fos/bethesda.htm#summary, accessed 8 December 2003].