Prevention of hip fracture by external hip protectors: an intervention in 17 nursing homes in two municipalities in Norway

Abstract

Aims: This study was undertaken to estimate the effect of hip protectors on the incidence of hip fracture when introduced into nursing homes as a regular part of the healthcare for all residents. Methods: A pre-test/test design was used. The pre-intervention period lasted 18 months from May 1996. The intervention period lasted 18 months from May 1998. During the intervention period all residents (965 beds) in nursing homes in two municipalities in Norway were offered free use of hip protectors. The project manager provided motivational activities in the nursing homes during the whole period, aimed at increasing the participation rate. Results: The intervention period showed a 39% reduction in the hip fracture incidence when compared with the pre-intervention period (p=0.003). The percentage of daily users of the protector varied from 35% during the first months to 22% at the end of the period. Among the 61 persons who suffered a hip fracture 31 were registered as daily users. Fourteen of the 31 users were not wearing the protector when the hip fracture occurred, while five of the 31 had the protector on their knees. Twelve of the 31 suffered a hip fracture while properly wearing the protector. Conclusions: This non-randomized study showed that hip protectors introduced to all residents in nursing homes considerably reduced the incidence of hip fracture. It may be possible to achieve higher compliance and a further reduction in the incidence of hip fractures if the producers of hip protectors increase the comfort of the protector without reducing its effect. In addition, it is important that health workers encourage more individuals at high risk to use the protector.

Keywords

accidental falls frail elderly hip fractures patient compliance protective clothing (hip protectors).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Johnell O. , Gullberg B. , Allander E. , Kanis JA The apparent incidence of hip fracture in Europe: a study of national register sources. MEDOS Study Group. Osteoporos Int 1992; 2(6): 298 - 302.

Meyer HE , Falch JA , O'Neill T. , Tverdal A. , Varlow J. Height and body mass index in Oslo, Norway, compared to other regions of Europe: do they explain differences in the incidence of hip fracture? European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group. Bone 1995 ; 17(4): 347-50.

Falch JA , Kaastad TS , Bohler G. , Espeland J. , Sundsvold OJ Secular increase and geographical differences in hip fracture incidence in Norway. Bone 1993; 14(4): 643 - 5.

Finsen V. , Benum P. Changing incidence of hip fractures in rural and urban areas of central Norway . Clin Orthop 1987(218): 104 - 10.

Lofthus CM , Osnes EK , Falch J. , Kaastad TS , Kristiansen IS , Nordsletten L. , et al. Epidemiology of hip fractures in Oslo, Norway. Bone 2001; 29: 413 - 8.

Gullberg B. , Johnell O. , Kanis JA World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 1997; 7(5): 407 - 13.

Kanis JA The incidence of hip fracture in Europe. Osteoporos Int 1993; 3(Suppl. 1): 10 - 15.

Kannus P. , Niemi S. , Parkkari J. , Palvanen M. , Vuori I. , Jarvinen M. Hip fractures in Finland between 1970 and 1997 and predictions for the future [see comments]. Lancet 1999; 353(9155): 802 - 5.

Ekman A. , Mallmin H. , Michaelsson K. , Ljunghall S. External hip protectors to prevent osteoporotic hip fractures [letter; comment] . Lancet 1997; 350(9077): 563 - 4.

10.

Lauritzen JB , Petersen MM , Lund B. Effect of external hip protectors on hip fractures [see comments]. Lancet 1993; 341(8836): 11 - 13.

11.

Parker MJ , Gillespie LD , Gillespie WJ Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in the elderly (Cochrane Review) . Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002(2): CD001255.

12.

Lauritzen JB , Lund B. Impacts in patients with hip fractures and in vitro study of the padding effect: introduction of a hip protector. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61(Suppl. 239).

13.

Sandvig S. , Forsén L. Forebygging av lårhalsbrudd ved bruk av hoftebeskytter. Et helsetjenestetiltak (Prevention of hip fractures by hip protectors. A health service initiative) [in Norwegian only] 2000: ISBN 82-91036-40-3.

14.

Oldham PD Measurement in medicine: the interpretation of numerical data. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1968.

15.

Ederer F. , Mantel N. Confidence limits on the ratio of two Poisson variables. Am J Epidemiol 1974; 100(3): 165 - 7.

16.

Armitage P. , Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research, 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications , 1994.

17.

Becker C. , Walter-Jung B. , Nikolaus T. The other side of hip protectors (Letters to the editor). Age Ageing 2000; 29: 186.

18.

Parkkari J. , Kannus P. , Palvanen M. , Natri A. , Vainio J. , Aho H. , et al. Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients. Calcif Tissue Int 1999; 65(3): 183 - 7.

19.

Kannus P. , Parkkari J. , Niemi S. , Pasanen M. , Palvanen M. , Jarvinen M. , et al. Prevention of hip fracture in elderly people with use of a hip protector. [see comments]. N Engl J Med 2000 ; 343(21): 1506 - 13.

20.

Harada A. , Mizuno M. , Takemura M. , Tokuda H. , Okuizumi H. , Niino N. Hip fracture prevention trial using hip protectors in Japanese nursing homes . Osteoporos Int 2001; 12(3): 215 - 21.

21.

Campbell AJ Purity, pragmatism and hip protector pads (Editorial). Age Ageing 2001; 30: 431 - 2.

22.

Torgerson D. , Birks Y. Purity, pragmatism and hip protector pads (Letters to the editor). Age Ageing 2002; 31: 319 - 25.

23.

Cameron ID , Stafford B. , Cumming RG , Birks C. , Kurrle SE , Lockwood K. , et al. Hip protectors improve falls self-efficacy. Age Ageing 2000; 29(1): 57 - 62.