Predictive value and completeness of the registration of congenital abnormalities in three Danish population-based registries

Abstract

Aims: The predictive value and completeness of data on congenital abnormalities (CAs) collected in three administrative health registries in the County of North Jutland, Denmark were compared. Methods: The study included all singleton liveborn infants in the county during the period 1991—94 (n=24,147). All infants recorded as having a CA in either the Medical Birth Registry (MBR), the Hospital Discharge Registry (HDR), or the National Registry of Congenital Abnormalities (NRCA) were identified, and the recordings in each registry were compared. Infants recorded in at least two registries were considered correctly diagnosed with a CA for the sake of the analyses. The predictive value was defined as the number of infants correctly diagnosed with a CA in the registry divided by the total number of infants recorded with a CA in the registry. In all cases with recording in one registry only, the predictive value of the registration with CA diagnosis was assessed through a review of a sample of medical records. The completeness was defined as the number of correctly diagnosed CAs in the registry divided by the total number of identified CAs. Results: The predictive value and completeness were calculated as 89.1% (85.3—92.8) and 32.3% (28.9—35.7) in the MBR; 88.2% (85.9—90.5) and 89.9% (87.7—92.1) in the HDR; and 99.6% (98.9—100.0) and 36.0% (32.5—39.5) in the NRCA. Conclusions: The HDR seems to have a predictive value and completeness that are acceptable for general surveillance and epidemiological research regarding CAs. The NRCA may be suitable for case-control studies owing to a high predictive value.

Keywords

completeness congenital abnormalities predictive value registries validation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

McBride WG Thalidomide and congenital abnormalities. Lancet 1961; ii: 1358.

Sørensen HT , Sabroe S. , Olsen J. A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research . Int J Epidemiol 1996; 25: 435—42.

Sørensen HT Regional administrative health registries as a resource in clinical epidemiology. A study of options, strengths, limitations and data quality provided with examples of use. Int J Risk Saf Med 1997; 10: 1—22.

Knudsen LB , Olsen J. The Danish Medical Birth Registry. Dan Med Bull 1998; 45: 320—3.

Andersen TF , Madsen M. , Jorgensen J. , Mellemkjaer L. , Olsen JH The Danish Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. Dan Med Bull 1999; 46: 263—8.

Christensen K. , Knudsen LB Registration of congenital malformations in Denmark. Dan Med Bull 1998; 45: 91—4.

Kallen B. , Winberg J. A Swedish register of congenital malformations. Experience with continuous registration during 2 years with special reference to multiple malformations . Pediatrics 1968; 41: 765—76.

Minton SD , Seegmiller RE An improved system for reporting congenital malformations. JAMA 1986; 256: 2976—9.

Piper JM , Mitchel EF Jr , Snowden M. , Hall C. , Adams M. , Taylor P. Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records. Am J Epidemiol 1993 ; 137: 758—68.

10.

Teperi J. Multi method approach to the assessment of data quality in the Finnish Medical Birth Registry. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993; 47: 242—7.

11.

Hemminki E. , Merilinen J. , Teperi J. Reporting of malformations in routine health registers. Teratology 1993 ; 48: 227—31.