This paper investigates the influence of collision angle on the interface characteristics and mechanical properties of magnetic pulse welded AA4014 tubes/Cu rods. It is shown that the collision angle, which affects the collision velocity, plays a crucial role in controlling the thickness of intermetallic compounds (IMC) layer and defect formation at the weld interface. The creation of a thin and continuous IMC layer at the weld interface is responsible for the higher load-bearing capacity of the sample welded under a collision angle of 4°. The welds made at higher collision angles are featured by a thick IMC layer containing defects such as micro-cracks, pores and cavities, which reduced the load-bearing capacity of the joint.
GalvãoI, LoureiroA, RodriguesDM.Critical review on friction stir welding of aluminium to copper. Sci Technol Weld Joining. 2016; 21(7):523–546. doi: 10.1080/13621718.2015.1118813
2.
LiuYB, SunQJ, WangH, Effect of the axial external magnetic field on copper/aluminium arc weld joining. Sci Technol Weld Joining. 2016; 21(6):460–465. doi: 10.1080/13621718.2015.1125406
3.
KahP, VimalrajC, MartikainenJ, Factors influencing Al-Cu weld properties by intermetallic compound formation. Int J Mech Mater Eng. 2015; 10(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40712-015-0037-8
4.
CarvalhoGH, GalvãoI, MendesR, Influence of base material properties on copper and aluminium–copper explosive welds. Sci Technol Weld Joining. 2018; 23(6):501–507. doi: 10.1080/13621718.2017.1417783
5.
ZhangC, ShirzadiAA.Measurement of residual stresses in dissimilar friction stir-welded aluminium and copper plates using the contour method. Sci Technol Weld Joining. 2018; 23(5):394–399. doi: 10.1080/13621718.2017.1402846
6.
PouranvariM.Critical assessment 27: dissimilar resistance spot welding of aluminium/steel: challenges and opportunities. Mater Sci Technol. 2017; 33(15):1705–1712. doi: 10.1080/02670836.2017.1334310
7.
BergmannJP, PetzoldtF, SchürerR, Solid-state welding of aluminum to copper—case studies. Weld World. 2013; 57(4):541–550. doi: 10.1007/s40194-013-0049-z
8.
YangJW, CaoB, HeXC, Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of Cu–Al joints by ultrasonic welding. Sci Technol Weld Joining. 2014; 19(6):500–504. doi: 10.1179/1362171814Y.0000000218
9.
AndradeDG, GalvãoI, VerderaD, Influence of the structure and phase composition of the bond interface on aluminium–copper lap welds strength. Sci Technol Weld Joining. 2018; 23(2):105–113. doi: 10.1080/13621718.2017.1329078
10.
XueP, XiaoBL, WangD, Achieving high property friction stir welded aluminium/copper lap joint at low heat input. Sci Technol Weld Joining. 2011; 16(8):657–661. doi: 10.1179/1362171811Y.0000000018
ShotriR, RacineuxG, DeA.Magnetic pulse welding of metallic tubes–experimental investigation and numerical modelling. Sci Technol Weld Joining. 2019; 25(4):1–9.
13.
RaoelisonRN, SapanathanT, BuironN, Magnetic pulse welding of Al/Al and Al/Cu metal pairs: Consequences of the dissimilar combination on the interfacial behavior during the welding process. J Manuf Process. 2015; 20:112–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.09.003
14.
ItoiT, MohamadAB, SuzukiR, Microstructure evolution of a dissimilar junction interface between an Al sheet and a Ni-coated Cu sheet joined by magnetic pulse welding. Mater Charact. 2016; 118:142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.05.021
15.
FaesK, KweeI.Electromagnetic pulse welded aluminium to copper sheet joints: morphological and mechanical characterization. 7th international conference on high speed forming; 2016 Apr 27–28; Dortmund, Germany.
16.
WangK, ShangSL, WangY, Unveiling non-equilibrium metallurgical phases in dissimilar Al–Cu joints processed by vaporizing foil actuator welding. Mater Des. 2020; 186:108306. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108306
17.
SarvariM, Abdollah-zadehA, Naffakh-MoosavyH, Investigation of collision surfaces and weld interface in magnetic pulse welding of dissimilar Al/Cu sheets. J Manuf Process. 2019; 45:356–367. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.07.012
18.
LeeJG, ParkJJ, LeeMK, End closure joining of ferritic-martensitic and oxide-dispersion strengthened steel cladding tubes by magnetic pulse welding. Metall Mater Trans A. 2015; 46(7):3132–3139. doi: 10.1007/s11661-015-2905-5
19.
XuW, SunX.Numerical investigation of electromagnetic pulse welded interfaces between dissimilar metals. Sci Technol Weld Joining. 2016; 21(7):592–599. doi: 10.1179/1362171815Y.0000000092
20.
PourabbasM, Abdollah-zadehA, SarvariM, Investigation of structural and mechanical properties of magnetic pulse welded dissimilar aluminum alloys. J Manuf Process. 2019; 37:292–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.002
21.
MaryaM, MaryaS.Interfacial microstructures and temperatures in aluminium–copper electromagnetic pulse welds. Sci Technol Weld Joining. 2004; 9(6):541–547. doi: 10.1179/174329304X8685
22.
WuX, ShangJ.An investigation of magnetic pulse welding of Al/Cu and interface characterization. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2014; 136(5):051002. doi: 10.1115/1.4027917
23.
Ben-ArtzyA, SternA, FrageN, Wave formation mechanism in magnetic pulse welding. Int J Impact Eng. 2010; 37(4):397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.07.008
SapanathanT, RaoelisonRN, BuironN, In situ metallic porous structure formation due to ultra high heating and cooling rates during an electromagnetic pulse welding. Scr Mater. 2017; 128:10–13. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.09.030
26.
RaoelisonRN, RacineD, ZhangZ, Magnetic pulse welding: interface of Al/Cu joint and investigation of intermetallic formation effect on the weld features. J Manuf Process. 2014; 16(4):427–434. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2014.05.002
27.
PaulH, Lityńska-DobrzyńskaL, PrażmowskiM.Microstructure and phase constitution near the interface of explosively welded aluminum/copper plates. Metall Mater Trans A. 2013; 44(8):3836–3851. doi: 10.1007/s11661-013-1703-1
28.
SternA, AizenshteinM.Bonding zone formation in magnetic pulse welds. Sci Technol Weld Joining. 2002; 7(5):339–342. doi: 10.1179/136217102225002673
