Writing at university: are we on the same page? / Escribir en la universidad: ¿nos entendemos?

Abstract

Spanish

This study seeks to analyse the characteristics and functions that students and faculty attribute to written genres in Spanish universities, to what extent these representations are shared by both groups, and how they contribute to the construction of disciplinary knowledge in Spanish higher education. Accordingly, we classified students’ and teachers’ responses into 12 genre families grouped into five functions: Disciplinary Knowledge (DK), Critical Analysis (AC), Personal Reflection (PR), Research (R) and Professional Practice (PP). In terms of functions, demonstration of disciplinary knowledge appeared as the most frequently mentioned goal for both groups, whereas the genres targeted at research were the least frequent ones, along with the genres used for personal reflection. The most common genre family for both groups was Explanation, which was linked to demonstration of knowledge acquired in the discipline.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Álvarez

Yániz

(2015). Las prácticas escritas en la universidad española. Monográfico sobre escritura académica. Cultura y Educación, 27, 594–628.

Bakhtin

(1982 [1979]). El problema de los géneros discursivos. En Estética de la creación verbal (pp. 248–293). Madrid: Siglo XXI.

Bazerman

(1988). Shaping Written Knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Camps

Castelló

(2013). La escritura académica en la Universidad. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 11, 17–37.

Carlino

(2004). Culturas académicas contrastantes en Australia, EE.UU. y Argentina: representaciones y prácticas sobre la escritura y sobre la supervisión de tesis en el grado y postgrado universitarios. Reunión Internacional “Mente y Cultura: cambios representacionales en el aprendizaje”. Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche: Universidad Nacional del Comahue.

Carlino

Iglesia

Laxalt

(2013). Concepciones y prácticas declaradas de profesores terciarios en torno al leer y escribir en las asignaturas. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. REDU, 11, 105–136.

Casanave

Hubbard

(1992). The writing assignments and writing problems of doctoral students: Faculty perceptions, pedagogical issues, and needed research. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 33–49. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(92)90005-U

Castelló

Mateos

(2015). Las representaciones de profesores y estudiantes sobre la escritura académica en las universidades españolas. Monográfico sobre escritura académica. Cultura y Educación, 27, 477–503.

Castelló

Mateos

Castells

Iñesta

Cuevas

Solé

(2012). Academic Writing Practices in Spanish Universities. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10, 569–590.

10.

Chitez

Kruse

(2012). Writing cultures and genres in higher education. In Castelló

Donahue

(Eds.), Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 151–176). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

11.

Ganobcsik-Williams

(2004). A Report on the Teaching of Academic Writing in UK Higher Education. Royal Literary Fund.

12.

Gardner

Nesi

(2013). A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied Linguistics, 34, 25–52. doi:10.1093/applin/ams024

13.

Gillett

Hammond

(2009). Mapping the maze of assessment: An investigation into Practice. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10, 120–137. doi:10.1177/1469787409104786

14.

Horowitz

(1986). What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 445–462. doi:10.2307/3586294

15.

Kinneavy

J. E.

(1969). The basic aims of discourse. College Composition and Communication., 20, 297–304. doi:10.2307/355033

16.

Leontiev

A. N.

(1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

17.

Miller

C. R.

(1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–167. doi:10.1080/00335638409383686

18.

Nesi

Gardner

(2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Pérez-Abril

Rodríguez

(2013). ¿Para qué se lee y se escribe en la universidad colombiana? Caracterización de prácticas de lectura y escritura en 17 universidades. Revista de Docencia Universitaria REDU, 11, 137–160.

20.

Russell

D. R.

(1997). Rethinking Genre in School and Society: An Activity Theory Analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504–554. doi:10.1177/0741088397014004004

21.

Scardamalia

Bereiter

(2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In Sawyer

(Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97–118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.