A critical review finds government agencies allow, permit, license, or ignore arsenic releases to surface soils. Release rates are controlled or evaluated using risk-based soil contaminant numerical limits employing standardized risk algorithms, chemicalspecific and default input values. United States arsenic residential soil limits, 0.4–40 ppm, generally correspond to a one-in-one-million to a one-in-ten-thousand incremental cancer risk range viaingestion of or direct contact with contaminated residential soils. Background arsenic surface soil levels often exceed applicable limits. Arsenic releases to surface soils (via, e.g., air emissions, waste recycling, soil amendments, direct pesticide application, and chromated copper arsenic (CCA)-treated wood) can result in greatly elevated arsenic levels, sometimes one to two orders of magnitude greater than applicable numerical limits. CCA-treated wood, a heavily used infrastructure material at residences and public spaces, can release sufficient arsenic to result in surface soil concentrations that exceed numerical limits by one or two orders of magnitude. Although significant exceedence of arsenic surface soil numerical limits would normally result in regulatory actions at industrial or hazardous waste sites, no such pattern is seen at residential and public spaces. Given the current risk assessment paradigm, measured or expected elevated surface soil arsenic levels at residential and public spaces suggest that a regulatory health crisis of sizeable magnitude is imminent. In contrast, available literature and a survey of government agencies conducted for this paper finds no verified cases of human morbidity or mortality resulting from exposure to elevated levels of arsenic in surface soils. This concomitance of an emerging regulatory health crisis in the absence of a medical crisis is arguably partly attributable to inadequate government and private party attention to the issue.
Adriano, D. C.1986. Trace elements in the terrestrial environment.New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
2.
ADHS.1998. Human health risk assessment for long-term residential use of Ironite lawn and garden nutrient supplement. Bureau of Epidemiology and Disease Control. Office of Environmental Health. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Department of Health Services.
3.
AEHS.1998. Study of State Soil Arsenic Regulations. Amherst, MA: Association for the Environmental Health of Soils. www.aehs.com/publications/catalog/contents/arsenic.pdf
4.
Alachua County CCA Team.2001. Chromated copper arsenate (CCA) pressure treated wood inventory and management practices in Alachua County.FL: Alachua County.
5.
Allinson, G., N. J. Turoczy, Y. Kelsall, M. Allinson, F. Stagnitti, J. Lloyd-Smith, and M. Nishikawa. 2000. Mobility of the constituents of chromated copper arsenate in a shallow sandy soil. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research43:149–156.
6.
ATSDR.1987. Public Health Assessment, Palmerton Zinc Pile, Palmerton, Carbon County, Pennsylvania. CERCLIS no. PAD002395887. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
7.
ATSDR.1995a. Public Health Assessment, Asarco Incorporated (Globe Plant), Denver, Denver County, Colorado. CERCLIS no. COD007063530. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. May 3, 1995.
8.
ATSDR.1995b. Petitioned Public Health Assessment, Phelps Dodge Douglas Reduction Works, Douglas, Cochise County, Arizona. CERCLIS no. AZD008397143. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. September 29, 1995.
9.
ATSDR.1997. Public Health Assessment, Murray Smelter, Murray, Salt Lake County, Utah. CERCLIS no. UTD980951420. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. January 3, 1997.
10.
ATSDR.1998. Exposure Investigation Blackbird Mine (a/k/a Panther Creek), Cobalt, Lemhi County, Idaho. CERCLIS no. IDD980725832. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. September 10, 1998.
11.
ATSDR.2000a. Toxicological profile for arsenic (update).Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. September 2000.
12.
ATSDR.2000b. Arsenic toxicity. In Case studies in environmental medicine. ATSDR-HE-CS-2002–003. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. October 2000. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HEC/CSEM/arsenic/arsenic.pdf, accessed November 3, 2002.
13.
ATSDR.2001a. Summary report for the ATSDR soil-pica workshop, June 2000, Atlanta, Georgia. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxics Substances Disease Registry. March 20, 2001.
14.
ATSDR. 2001b. Minimal risk levels (MRLs) for hazardous substances. December 2001. Updated January 8, 2002. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/mrls.html, accessed November 3, 2002.
15.
ATSDR.2002a. 12 steps toward a healthier school. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. April 17, 2002.
16.
ATSDR.2002b. Children's exposures. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. September 30, 2002.
17.
Ayres, R. U., and L. W. Ayres. 1999. 2. Life cycle of materials. In Accounting for resources, 183–274. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
18.
Baars, A. J., R. M. C. Theelen, P. J. C. M. Janssen, M. E. Appeldoorn, M. C. M. van, Meijerink, L. Verdam, and M. J. Zeilmaker. 2001. Reevaluation of human-toxicological maximum permissible risk levels. RIVM Report 711701 025. The Netherlands: RIVM, Institute of Public Health and the Environment.
19.
Baranger, P., A. Saada, S. Cornu, and C. Crouzet. 2001. Adsorption de l'arsenic sur des complexes argilo-humiques. Les Techniques de l'Industrie Minérale11:89–93.
20.
Barringer, J. L., T. H. Barringer, P. J. Lacombe, and C. W. Holmes. 2001. Arsenic in soils and sediments adjacent to Birch Swamp Brook in the vicinity of Texas Road (downstream from the Imperial Oil Company Superfund site), Monmouth County, New Jersey. Water-Resources Investigations Report 00–4185. West Trenton, NJ: United States Geological Survey.
21.
Basu, A., J. Mahata, S. Gupta, and A. K. Giri. 2001. Genetic toxicology of a paradoxical human carcinogen, arsenic: A review. Mutat. Res.488:171–194.
22.
Beliles, R. P.1994. The metals. In Patty's industrial hygiene and toxicology, Fourth Edition, Volume II, Part C, Toxicology, ed. G. D. Clayton and F. E. Clayton, 1913–1925. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
23.
Belluck, D. A., and S. L. Benjamin. 2001. Environmental sampling and analysis of coal fly ash intended for use in roads. In Radionuclides and heavy metals in environment, ed. M. V. Frontasyeva et al., 227–236. The Netherlands: Kluwer Press.
24.
Belluck, D. A., and S. L. Benjamin. 2003. Lost science: Effects on environmental risk policy, litigation, due diligence and regulation. In Environmentally-acceptable pollution and reclamation endpoints: Scientific issues and policy development, eds. P. Baveye, B. L. Hoyle, M. Spagnuolo, and V. Goncharuk. NATO ASI Series, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers (forthcoming).
25.
Benramdane, L., F. Bressole, and J. J. Vallon. 1999. Arsenic speciation in humans and food products: A review. J. Chrom. Sci.37:330–344.
26.
Bhumbla, D. K., and R. F. Keefer. 1994. Arsenic mobilization and bioavailability in soils. In Arsenic in the environment, Part I: Cycling and characterization, ed. J. O. Nriagu, 51–82. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
27.
Bleiwas, D.I.2000. Arsenic and old waste.Reston, VA: United States Geological Survey.
28.
Breckenridge, R. P., and A. B. Crockett. 1995. Determination of background concentrations of inorganics in soils and sediments at hazardous waste sites. Engineering Forum Issue. Technology and Innovation Office, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. EPA/540/S-96/500. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
29.
Brooks, K. M.1997. Literature review and assessment of the environmental risks associated with the use of CCA-treated wood products in aquatic environments.Vancouver, WA: Western Wood Preservers Institute.
30.
Brooks, R. R.1972. Geobotany and biogeochemistry in mineral exploration.New York, NY: Harper & Row.
31.
California EPA. 2001. Arsenic and arsenic compounds. Prioritization of Toxic Air Contaminants—Children's Environmental Health Protection Act.
32.
Callinan, C. W.2001. Water quality study of the Finger Lakes. New York Department of Environmental Conservation.
33.
CDC. 1995. Agriculture health hazard evaluation, Cackle Corners Valliant, Oklahoma. HETA 94–0331–2535. October 1995. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
34.
CDHS. No date. HESIS fact sheet wood preservatives containing arsenic and chromates. Hazard Evaluation System and Information Service. Oakland, CA: California Department of Health Services.
35.
CDPH.2001. Fact sheet. What you need to know about pesticides used in pressure treated wood. Hartford CT: State of Connecticut, Connecticut Department of Public Health. February 2001. Connecticut Department of Public Health.
36.
Chaney, R. L., and J. A. Ryan. 1994. Risk based standards for arsenic, lead and cadmium in urban soils.Frankfurt A.M., Germany: DECHEMA.
37.
Chemical Specialties, Inc.2001. MSDS, CCA type c pressure-treated wood. MSDS # C12M. Charlotte, NC: Chemical Specialties, Inc. http://www. treatedwood.com/products/supatimber/msds.pdf, accessed on November 3, 2002.
38.
Chou, S. (CDC/ATSDR). E-mail to Belluck, 25 October 2002.
39.
CHWA.1987. Report to the Legislature, evaluation of hazards posed by the use of wood preservatives on playground equipment. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Berkley, CA: California Health and Welfare Agency.
40.
City of Tacoma. 2002. Recommendations for management of street wastes. In Surface Water Manual Draft, Volume IV, Source Control BMPs, Volume IV, Source Control BMPs, Environmental Services, Water and Surface Water Management. Draft. May 2002. Appendix 4C. Tacoma, WA: City of Tacoma.
41.
Clausen, C. A.2000. CCA removal from treated wood using a dual remediation process. Waste Manag. Res.18:485–488.
42.
Clausen, C. A., and R. L. Smith. 1998. CCA removal from treated wood by chemical, mechanical, and microbial processing. In Proceedings of the 4th International Wood Preservation Symposium, The Challenge-Safety and Environment. IRG/WP 98–50101. Cannes-Mandelieu, France, February 2–3, 1998. Stockholm, Sweden: IRG Secretariat.
43.
Clewell, H. J., P. R. Gentry, H. A. Barton, A. M. Shipp, J. W. Yager, and M. E. Andersen. 1999. Requirements for a biologically realistic cancer risk assessment for inorganic arsenic. Int. J. Toxicol.18:131–147.
44.
Cochran, K., C. Mc Lendon, and T. Townsend. 2002 Should local and county governments get more involved in C&D recycling efforts? Recycling Today, May 28. http://www.recyclingtoday.com/articles/article.asp?Id=4402, accessed on November 3, 2002.
45.
Cooney, C. M.2002. Tracking national toxic exposure and illness. Environ. Sci. Technol.36:306A–307A.
46.
Cooper, P. A.1991. Leaching of CCA from treated wood: p H effects. Forest Prod. Res. Soc.41:30–32.
47.
Cullen, W. R., and K. J. Reimer. 1989. Arsenic speciation in the environment. Chem. Rev.89:713–764.
48.
Davis, A., D. Sherwin, R. Ditmar, and K. A. Hoenke. 2001. An analysis of soil arsenic Records of Decision. Environ. Sci. Technol.35:2401–2406.
49.
Decker, P., B. Cohen, J. H. Butala, and T. Gordon. 2002. Exposure to wood dust and heavy metals in workers using CCA pressure-treated wood. A. I. H. A. J.63:166–171.
50.
De Groot, R. C., T. W. Popham, L. R. Gjovik, and T. Forehand. 1979. Distribution gradients of arsenic, copper, and chromium around preservative-treated stakes. J. Environ. Qual.8:39–41.
51.
De Kimpe, C. R. De and J. L. Morel. 2000. Urban soil management: A growing concern. Soil Sci.165:31–40.
52.
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Environment Agency.2002. Contaminants in soil: Collation of toxicological data and intake values for humans. Arsenic. Almondsbury, Bristol, UK: Environment Agency. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/landliability/pdf/tox1.pdf, accessed November 3, 2002.
53.
De Sesso, J. M., C. F. Jacobson, A. R. Scialli, C. H. Farr, and J. F. Holson. 1998. An assessment of the developmental toxicity of inorganic arsenic. Reprod. Toxicol.12:385–433.
54.
Dragun, J., and A. Ciasson. 1991. Elements in North American soils.Greenbelt, MD: Hazardous Materials Resource Institute.
55.
Elkassabany, N. (United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs). E-mail and telephone conversations with author, 29 and 30 July 2002.
56.
Ellickson, K. M., R. J. Meeker, M. A. Gallo, B. T. Buckley, and P. J. Lioy. 2001. Oral bioavailability of lead and arsenic from a NIST standard reference soil material. Arch Environ Contam. Toxicol.40:128–135.
57.
Elliott, R.2002. Issues for EPA and state agencies on CCA-treated wood disposal. Presented at 2002 RCRA National Meeting, January 15–18, 2002, Washington, DC.
58.
Envirochem Special Projects, Inc.1992. Evaluation of leachate quality from CCA preserved wood products. Environmental Canada and British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks. North Vancouver, BC: Environmental Canada.
59.
Environment Canada and Health and Welfare Canada.1993. Arsenic and its compounds.Ottawa, Canada: Canada Communications Group.
60.
Environmental Health Tracking Project Team. 2000. America's environmental health gap: Why the country needs a nationwide tracking system. Companion Report. John Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health. http://healthyamericans.org/resources/files/healthgap.pdf, accessed on November 3, 2002.
61.
Environmental Working Group.2001a. Poisoned playgrounds, arsenic in “pressure-treated” wood.Washington, DC: Environmental Working Group.
62.
Environmental Working Group and Healthy Building Network. 2001b. Petition to the United States consumer product safety commission to ban arsenic treated wood in playground equipment and review the safety of arsenic treated wood for general use. May 22, 2001. http://www.ewg.org/reports/poisonedplaygrounds/petition.pdf, accessed on November 3, 2002.
63.
European Commission. 2001. Pollutants in urban waste water and sewage sludge. Final report. Directorate-General Environment.
64.
Evans, L. J.1989. Chemistry of metal retention by soil. Environ. Sci. Technol.23:1047–1056.
65.
Fergusson, J. E., E. A. Forbes, and R. J. Schroeder. 1986. The elemental composition and sources of house dust and street dust. Sci. Total Environ.50:217–221.
66.
The Fertilizer Institute.2000. Health risk evaluation of select metals in inorganic fertilizers post application.Washington, DC: The Weinberg Group, Inc.
67.
Fields, S.2001. How dangerous is CCA?Environ. Health Perspec.109:A262–A269.
68.
Florida Physicians Arsenic Workgroup. 2002. Letter to John Agwunobi, M. D., Secretary of Health, State of Florida, 14 June 2002.
69.
Focazio, M. J., A. H. Welch, S. A. Watkins, D. R. Helsel, and M. A Horn. 1999. A retrospective analysis on the occurrence of arsenic in ground-water resources of the United States and limitations in drinking-water-supply characterizations. Water Resources Investigation Report 99–4279. Reston, VA: United States Geological Survey.
70.
Folkes, D. J., S. O. Helgen, and R. A. Litle. 2000. Impacts of historic arsenical pesticide use on residential soils in Denver, Colorado. In Society of Geochemistry & Health, Fourth International Conference on Arsenic Exposure And Health Effects, San Diego, June 18–22nd, 2000. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, Ltd. http://phys4.harvard.edu/wilson/San Diego2000/Abstracts1.html#8, accessed on November 3, 2002.
71.
Freeman, G. B., R. A. Schoof, M. V. Ruby, A. O. Davis, J. A. Dill, S. C. Liao, C. A. Lapin, and P. D. Bergstrom. 1995. Bioavailability of arsenic in soil and house dust impacted by smelter activities following oral administration in Cynomologus monkeys. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol.28:215–222.
72.
Frink, C. R.1996. A perspective on metals in soils. J. Soil Contam.5:329–359.
73.
Garbarino, J. R., D. W. Rutherford, and R. L. Wershaw. 2001. Degradation of Roxarsone in poultry litter.Denver, CO: United States Geological Survey.
74.
Gedrose, J. K.1987. Progress in chronic disease prevention reduction of children's arsenic exposure following relocation—Mill Creek, Montana. MMWR Morb. Mort. Wkly. Rep.36:505–507.
75.
Gerr, F., R. Letz, P. B. Ryan, and R. C. Green. 2000. Neurological effects of environmental exposure to arsenic in dust and soil among humans. Neurotoxicology21:475–487.
76.
Gordon, T., J. Spanier, J. H. Butala, P. Li, and T. G. Rossman. 2002. In vitro bioavailability of heavy metals in pressure-treated wood dust. Toxicol. Sci.67:32–37.
77.
Gradient Corporation.2001. Evaluation of human health risks from exposure to arsenic associated with CCA-treated wood.Cambridge, MA: Gradient Corporation.
78.
Gray, S., and J. Houlihan. 2002. All hands on deck. Washington, DC: Environmental Working Group. http://www.ewg.org/reports/allhandsondeck/, accessed on November 3, 2002.
79.
Graziano, C., and R. J. Hamilton. 2002. Toxicity, arsenic. e Medicine J.3:4. April 4, 2002. http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic168.htm, accessed on November 3, 2002.
80.
Grissom, R. E., C. O. Abernathy, A. S. Susten, and J. M. Donohue. 1999. Estimating total arsenic exposure in the United States. In Arsenic exposure and health effects, ed. W. R. Chapell, C. O. Abernathy, and R. L. Calderon, 51–60. New York, NY: Elsevier.
81.
Gupta, G., and S. Charles. 1999. Trace elements in soils fertilized with poultry litter. Poultry Sci.78:1695–1698.
82.
Hancock, T. C., J. M. Denver, G. F. Riedel, and C. V. Miller. 2001. Source, transport, and fate of arsenic in the Pocomoke River Basin, a poultrydominated Chesapeake Bay watershed. Washington, DC: United States Geological Survey. http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/Arsenic/finalabstracts.htm, accessed on November 3, 2002.
83.
Harrison, E. Z., M. B. Mc Bride, and D. R. Bouldin. 1999. The case for caution. Recommendations for land application of sewage sludges and an appraisal of the US EPA's Part 503 Sludge Rules. Working Paper. Revision. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Waste Management Institute.
84.
Hauserman, J. 2001. The poison in your backyard. St. Petersburg Times, 11 March.
85.
Hazardous Substance & Waste Management Research, Inc.2000. Health considerations related to arsenic in soil under decks constructed of CCA-treated wood.Tallahassee, FL: Hazardous Substance & Waste Management Research, Inc.
86.
Hazardous Substance & Waste Management Research, Inc.2001. Development of wood surface target quantity for arsenic based on exposure to decks or playground equipment constructed of CCA-treated wood. Revised.Tallahassee, FL: Hazardous Substance & Waste Management Research, Inc.
87.
Health Canada.1995. Canadian soil quality guidelines for contaminated sites human health effects: Inorganic arsenic final report. The National Contaminated Sites Remediation Program. Ottowa, Canada: Health Canada.
88.
Health Canada. 1998. The health and environment handbook for health professionals. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ehp/ehd/catalogue/bch_pubs/98ehd211/98ehd211.htm, accessed on June 6, 2002.
89.
Hebel, A.1998. Part I: Soil degradation—diagnosis, appraisal and reversing measures. In Towards sustainable land use, furthering cooperation between people and institutions, Volume I, Advances in geoecology 31, ed. H. P. Blume, H. Eger, E. Fleischhauer, A. Hebel, C. Reij, and K. G. Steiner, 3–10. Reiskirchen, Germany:Catena Verlag, GMBH.
90.
Historic Pesticide Contamination Task Force.1999. Findings and recommendations for the remediation of historic pesticide contamination. Final report.Trenton NJ: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.
91.
Holleman, J. T.1993. In Arkansas which comes first, the chicken or the environment?Tulane Environmental Law Journal6:21–60.
92.
Holton, W. C.1998. No safe harbor. Environ. Health Perspect.106:A228–A233.
93.
Hwang, Y. H., R. L. Bornschein, J. Grote, W. Menrath, and S. Roda. 1997. Environmental arsenic exposure to children around a former copper smelter. Environ. Res.72:72–81.
94.
IARC. 1998. Arsenic and arsenic compounds (Group 1). International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)—Summaries & Evaluations. IARC Summary & Evaluation, Supplement 7, 1987. Updated February 6, 1998. International Agency for Research on Cancer. http://www.inchem.org/documents/iarc/iarc/iarc835.htm, accessed on November 3, 2002.
95.
IDEM.2001. Nonrule policy document. WASTE-0031-NPD. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
96.
Jin, C., and A. F. Preston. 1993. Depletion of preservatives from treated wood: Results from laboratory, fungus cellar and field tests. In Wood preservation, 2nd International Symposium, 8–9 Fevrier 1993, Cannes-Mandelieu, France, 110–119. Stockholm, Sweden: IRG Secretariat.
97.
Johnson, B. L., and C. T. De Rosa. 1997. The toxicologic hazard of superfund hazardous waste sites. Rev. Environ. Health12:235–251.
98.
Kabata-Pendias, A., and H. Pendias. 2001. Trace elements in soils and plants, Third Edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
99.
Kastury, S.2002. Regulatory concerns with CCA treated wood. Presented at 2002 RCRA National Meeting, January 15–18, 2002. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency. www.epa.gov/epaoswer/osw/meeting/pdf02/kastury.pdf, accessed November 3, 2002.
100.
Kelley, M. E., S. E. Brauning, R. A. Schoof, and M. V. Ruby. 2002. Assessing oral bioavailability of metals in soil.Columbus, OH: Batelle Press.
101.
Kennedy, M. J., and P. A. Collins. 2001. Leaching of preservative components from pine decking treated with CCA and copper azole, and interactions of leachates with soils. In International Research Group on Wood Preservatives, Section 5, Environmental Aspects, 32nd Annual Meeting, Nara, Japan, May 20–25, 2001. IRG/WP 01–50178, IRG Secretariat, SE-100 44. Stockholm, Sweden: IRG Secretariat.
102.
Lamm, S. H.2001. Health effects of arsenic. Paper presented on behalf of the Baltimore District of the Army Corps of Engineers to the residents of Spring Valley, Washington, DC. August 7, 2001.
103.
Landau Associates, Inc. 2002. Tech-memo-human health and ecological risk characterization. Area-Wide Soil Contamination Project—Task 4. Washington State Department of Ecology.
104.
Lanphear, B. P., T. D. Matte, J. Rogers, R. P. Clickner, B. Dietz, R. L. Bornschein, P. Succop, K. R. Mahaffey, S. Dixon, W. Galke, M. Rabinowitz, M. Farfel, C. Rohde, J. Schwartz, P. Ashley, and D. E. Jacobs. 1998. The contribution of lead-contaminated house dust and residential soil to children's blood lead levels. A pooled analysis of 12 epidemiologic studies. Environ Res.79:51–68.
105.
Lebow, S.1996. Leaching of wood preservative components and their mobility in the environment. Summary of pertinent literature. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-93. United States Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. Madison, WI: United States Department of Agriculture.
106.
Lebow, S. T., and M. Tippie. 2001. Guide for minimizing the effect of preservative-treated wood on sensitive environments. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-122. United States Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. Madison, WI: United States Department of Agriculture.
107.
Lemus, R., A. A. Abdelghani, T. G. Akers, and W. E. Horner. 1996. Health risks from exposure to metals in household dusts. Rev. Environ. Health11:179–189.
108.
Liebens, J.2001. Contamination of sediments in street sweepings and stormwater systems: Pollutant composition and sediment reuse options. Pensacola, FL: University of West Florida.
109.
Lindsay, W. L.1979. Chemical equilibria in soils.New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
110.
Livesey, N. T., and P. M. Huang. 1981. Adsorption of arsenate by soils and its relation to selected chemical properties and anions. Soil Sci.131:88–94.
111.
Lobenstein, J. R.1994. The materials flow of arsenic in the United States. Information Circular 9382. Bureau of Mines. Washington, DC: United States Department of the Interior.
112.
Lorenzana, R. M., B. Duncan, M. Ketterer, J. Lowry, J. Simon, M. Dawson, and R. Poppenga. 1996. Bioavailability of arsenic and lead in environmental substrates. Superfund/Office of Environmental Assessment, Region 10. EPA 910/R-96–002. Denver, CO: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
113.
Maas, R. P. 2002. Statement by Dr. Richard P. Maas, Ph.D., regarding health risks from CCA-treated lumber to FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP), August 30, 2002.
114.
Maas, R. P., S. C. Patch, A. M. Stork, J. F. Berkowitz, and G. A. Stork. 2002. Release of total chromium, chromium VI and total arsenic from new and aged pressure treated lumber. Technical Report 02–093. Asheville, NC: University of North Carolina–Asheville Environmental Quality Institute. February 2002.
115.
Mac Coy, D. E., and R. W. Black. 1998. Organic compounds and trace elements in freshwater streambed sediment and fish from the Puget Sound basin. USGS Fact Sheet 105–98. National Water-Quality Assessment Program. Reston, VA: United States Geological Survey.
116.
Maggs, R.2002. A review of arsenic in ambient air in the U.K. Department of the Environment, Transport and The Regions, Scottish Executive, and The National Assembly for Wales. SSE/AQ/1465. London, UK: Department of the Environment, Transport and The Regions.
117.
Manning, B. A., and S. Goldberg. 1997. Adsorption and stability of arsening (III) at the clay mineral-water interface. Environ. Sci. Technol.31:2005–2011.
118.
Marcus, S.2001. Toxicity, arsenic. e Medicine J.2:9. September 11, 2001. http://www.emedicine.com/EMERG/topic42.htm, accessed on November 3, 2002.
119.
Matschullat, J.2000. Arsenic in the geosphere—A review. Sci. Total Environ.249:297–312.
120.
Matus, R. 2000. Fears rise over wood treatment. Gainesville Sun, 1 April.
121.
Matus, R. 2001. County votes to tear down playgrounds. Gainesville Sun, 26 September.
122.
Mc Lendon, C., T. G. Townsend, and K. M. Cochran. 2002. With Business booming its time to take another look at C&D. MSW Management, July/August. http://www.forester.net/mw_0208_with.html, accessed on November 3, 2002.
123.
Mc Mahon, C. K., P. B. Bush, and E. A. Woolson. 1986. How much arsenic is released when CCA-treated wood is burned?Forest Products J.36:45–50.
124.
Mc Mahon, T. F., and J. Chen. 2001. Hazard identification and toxicology endpoint selection for inorganic arsenic and inorganic chromium. FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Background Document. Office of Pesticide Programs Antimicrobials Division. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
125.
MDA.2000. Site information, CMC Heartland Lite Yard site, Minneapolis, Minnesota.St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Agriculture.
126.
MDEP.1995. Numerical ranking system scoresheet. 310 CMR 40.1511. Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
127.
MDEP.1999. Subpart C: Notification of releases and threats of release of oil and hazardous material; identification and listing of oil and hazardous material. 10 CMR 40.0000: Massachusetts contingency plan. Updated December 1, 1999. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
128.
MDH. 1999. Screening evaluation of arsenic, cadmium, and lead levels in Minnesota fertilizer products. April 1999. Minnesota Department of Health.
129.
MDH.2001. Chromated copper arsenate (CCA) environmental health information sheet. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Health.
130.
MDH.2002. Minnesota Department of Health letter to USEPA commenting on registration of some chromated copper arsenate (CCA) products. Docket # OPP66300. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Health.
131.
MDNR.2002. Pre-CERCLIS site screening reports: Missouri State Parks' playgrounds.Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Department of Natural Resources.
132.
Meyer, I., J. Heinrich, and U. Lippold. 1999. Factors affecting lead, cadmium, and arsenic levels in house dust in a smelter town in Eastern Germany. Environ. Res.81:32–44.
133.
Miller, R. L., and B. F. Mc Pherson. 2002. Occurrence and distribution of contaminants in bottom sediment and water of the Barron River Canal, Big Cypress National Preserve, Florida, October 1998. Tampa, FL: United States Geological Survey. http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/papers/bottom_sed/results.html, accessed on November 3, 2002.
134.
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.1998. Code of good agricultural practice for the protection of soil. London, UK: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and the Welsh Office Agriculture Department. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environ/cogap/soilcode.pdf, accessed on November 3, 2002.
135.
MPCA.1999a. Draft guidelines risk-based guidance for the soil—human health pathway, Volume 2. Technical Support Document. St. Paul MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. January 1999.
136.
MPCA.1999b. Using coal ash as a fertilizer: Risks and safeguards. Water/Land Application/#1.02. St. Paul MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. May 1999.
137.
MPCA. April2002. Treated wood: Use, disposal and alternatives for homeowners. Waste/Household Hazardous Waste/#4.75. Policy and Planning Division. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
138.
Mukerjee, D.1998. Assessment of risk from multimedia exposures of children to environmental chemicals. Air Waste Manage. Assoc.48:483–501.
139.
Mumma, R. O., D. C. Raupach, J. P. Waldman, S. S. C. Tong, M. L. Jacobs, J. G. Babish, J. H. Hotchkiss, P. C. Wszolek, W. H. Gutenman, C. A. Bache, and D. J. Lisk. 1984. National survey of elements and other constituents in municipal sewage sludges. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.13(1):75–83.
140.
Murphy, B. L., A. P. Toole, and P. D. Bergstrom. 1989. Health risk assessment for arsenic contaminated soil. Environ. Geochem. Health11:163–169.
141.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command.2000a. Final guide for incorporating bioavailability adjustments into human health and ecological risk assessments at U.S. Navy and Marine Corps facilities. Part 1: Overview of metals bioavailability. Washington, DC: Naval Facilities Engineering Command.
142.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command.2000b. Guide for incorporating bioavailability adjustments into human health and ecological risk assessments at U.S. Navy and Marine Corps facilities. Part 2: Technical background document for assessing metals bioavailability. Final NFESC User's Guide. UG-2041-ENV. Washington, DC: Naval Facilities Engineering Command.
143.
New England Biosolids & Residuals Association.2001. Saving soil: Biosolids recycling in New England.Tamworth, NH: New England Biosolids & Residuals Association.
144.
New Zealand Ministry for the Environment and Ministry of Health.1997. Health and environmental guidelines for selected timber treatment chemicals.Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Ministry for the Environment.
145.
NJDOT.1998. Roadwaste characterization project. Analytical findings and disposal recommendations.Trenton, NJ: New Jersey Department of Transportation.
146.
NOAA. 1993. Koppers Company, Inc., Charleston Plant. Charleston, South Carolina CERCLIS #SCD980310239. In Coastal Hazardous Waste Reviews. Washington, DC: National Oceanic and Space Administration. 85–92.
147.
Nova Scotia Department of Health and the Cape Breton District Health Authority. 2001. Lead and arsenic biological testing program in residential areas near the coke ovens site. www.gov.ns.ca/health/downloads/Full_Report.pdf, accessed November 3, 2002.
148.
NRC.1977. Arsenic: Medical and biological effects of environmental pollutants. National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
149.
NRC.1999. Arsenic in drinking water. National Research Council. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
150.
NRC.2001. Arsenic in drinking water: 2001 Update. National Research Council. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
151.
Nriagu, J. O., and J. M. Pacyna. 1988. Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals. Nature333:134–139.
152.
NYCAP. 2002. New research indicates toxic playgrounds in the capital region. New York Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides. http://www.bancca.org/CCA_Article2/CCA_Press Release_NYCAP.htm, accessed November 3, 2002.
153.
NYSDOH.1987. Biological monitoring of schoolchildren in Middleport, NY, for arsenic and lead.Albany, NY: New York Department of Health.
154.
ODHS.2002. Arsenic health effects information technical bulletin. Office of Public Health Systems, Environmental Toxicology Section. Portland, OR: Oregon Department of Human Services.
155.
OECD.2000a. Report of the OECD workshop on human exposure assessment to wood preservatives. June 2000. Ottawa, Canada: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
156.
OECD. 2000b. Wood preservation and human exposure. In Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Workshop on Assessing Environmental Exposure to Wood Preservatives. 10–12 April 2000, Belgirate, Italy. http://www.bfafh.de/inst4/43/useful.htm, accessed October 25, 2002.
157.
OEHHA. 2000. Appendix G. Chemical-specific soil half-life. In Technical support document for exposure assessment and stochastic analysis. California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. September 2000. http://www.oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/pdf/apeng.pdf accessed June 4, 2002.
158.
OEHHA. 2001. Arsenic and arsenic compounds. Prioritization of toxic air contaminants—Children's Environmental Health Protection Act. Berkley, California. California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. October 2001.
159.
O'Neill, P.1990. Arsenic. In Heavy Metals in Soils, ed. B. J. Alloway, 83–99. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
160.
Ontario Ministry of Transportation. 1992. Pressure treated wood in Canada: Task force report. SRR-92–05. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Transportation.
161.
Oomen, A. G., A. Hack, M. Minekus, E. Zeijdner, C. Cornelis, G. Schoeters, W. Verstraete, T. Van de Wiele, J. Wragg, C. J. Rompelberg, A. J. Sips, and J. H. Van Wijnen. 2002. Comparison of five in vitro digestion models to study the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants. Environ. Sci. Technol.36:3326–3334.
162.
Otten, L., G. Halet, R. P. Voroney, J. Winter, S. A. Andrews, H. Lee, and J. T. Trevors. 1998. Metro Toronto composting project. Paper presented at the 8th Annual National Composting Conference of the Composting Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, November 4–6, 1998. http://www.compost.org/wdo_ii_nf.html, accessed on November 3, 2002.
163.
Pacyna, J. M., Scholtz, M. T., and Y. F. Li. 1995. Global budget of trace metal sources. Environ. Rev.1:145–159.
164.
Palcisko, G. J. 2000. Children's Exposure to Lead and Arsenic in Orchard Soils. Master's thesis, University of Washington, 2000.
165.
Paustenbach, D. J., B. L. Finley, and T. F. Long. 1997. The critical role of house dust in understanding the hazards posed by contaminated soils. Int. J. Toxicol.16:339–362.
166.
Prognosis (electronic newsletter of Wayne State University School of Medicine). 2001. Bonior introduces federal legislation to lower allowable levels of arsenic in drinking water; press conference held at office of SOM faculty member and arsenic expert, April. http://www.med.wayne.edu/PR/prognosis/2001/april/progapr.htm, accessed on November 3, 2002.
167.
Queensland Department of Health.2001. Health-based soil investigation levels. en Health Council. Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. Canberra, Australia: Aus Info. http://www.health.gov.au/pubhlth/publicat/document/env_soil.pdf, accessed on November 3, 2002.
168.
Rabano, E. S., N. T. Castillo, K. J. Torre, and P. A. Solomon. 1989. Speciation of arsenic in ambient aerosols collected in Los Angeles. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association39:76–80.
169.
Rasmussen, P. E., K. S. Subramanian, and B. Jessiman. 2000. Geochemistry of house dust, soil, and street dust in the City of Ottawa, Canada. Geo-Canada 2000. Ottawa, Canada: Health Canada. www.cseg.ca/conferences/2000/506.PDF, accessed November 3, 2002.
170.
Reese, R. G., Jr. 2000. Arsenic. U.S. Geological Survey, mineral commodity summaries.Washington, DC: United States Geological Survey.
171.
Roberts, S. M., and H. G. Ochoa. 2001. Report assessing the risks from arsenic exposure through direct contact with CCA-treated wood. Submitted to John Rudell, Florida, Department of Environmental Protection. April 10, 2001.
172.
Rossbach, M., C. Mohl, and H. Emons. 1995. Analysis of soils and sediments for monitoring purposes with the environmental specimen bank of Germany. In Heavy Metals in the Environment, Volume 2, ed. R. D. Wilken, U. Forstner, and A. Knochel, 383–386. Edinburgh, Scotland: CEP Consultants.
173.
Ruby, M. V., A. Davis, R. Schoof, S. Eberle, and C. M. Sellstone. 1996. Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a physiologically based extraction test. Environ. Sci. Technol.30:422–430.
174.
Savitz, E. J. 2002. Under pressure: Companies making CCA-treated wood are pinched by environmental concerns and litigation. Barrons, 17 June.
175.
Schaffer, M. 2001. Waste lands, the threat of toxic fertilizer. CALPIRG Charitable Trust. http://www.pirg.org/toxics/reports/wastelands/, accessed November 3, 2002.
176.
Schert, J.2002. The phase out of CCA in the United States. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation 33rd Annual Meeting, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom, 12–17 May 2002. IRG/WP 02–50194. Stockholm, Sweden: IRG Secretariat.
177.
Seifert, B., K. Becker, D. Helm, C. Krause, C. Schulz, and M. Seiwert. 2000. The German environmental survey 1990/1992 (Ger ES II): Reference concentrations of selected environmental pollutants in blood, urine, hair, house dust, drinking water and indoor air. J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol.10:552–565.
178.
Senesi, G. S., G. Baldassarre, N. Senesi, and B. Radina. 1999. Trace element inputs into soils by anthropogenic activities and implications for human health. Chemosphere39:343–377.
179.
Sheahan, J. 2001. Solutions discussed to deal with problem waste materials. U.S. Mayors Articles, 19 November. http://www.usmayors.org/uscm/us_mayor_newspaper/documents/11_19_01/mwma_solut ions.asp, accessed on November 3, 2002.
180.
Shields, E. J.1990. Pollution control engineer's handbook.Des Plaines, IL: Cahners Publishing Company.
181.
Simon, S. L.1998. Soilingestion by humans: A review of history, data, and etiology with application to risk assessment of radioactively contaminated soil. Health Phys.74:647–672.
182.
Solo-Gabriele, H., J. Penha, V. Catilu, T. Townsend, and T. Tolaymat. 1998. Generation, use, disposal, and management options for CCA-treated wood.Gainesville, FL: Florida Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management.
183.
Southern Forest Products Association. 2000. 2000 Southern Pine Treated Lumber Survey. http://www.sfpa.org/Industry_Statistics/2000_Treated_Survey_WFC.pdf, accessed November 3, 2002.
184.
Squibb, K. S., and B. A. Fowler. 1983. The toxicity of arsenic and its compounds. In Biological and environmental effects of arsenic, ed. B. A. Fowler, 233–269. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
185.
State of Alaska. 1998. Arsenic poisoning or not? Epidemiology Bulletin No. 22, November 17, 1998.
186.
Stilwell, D. E., and K. D. Gorney. 1997. Contamination of soil with copper, chromium, and arsenic under decks built from pressure treated wood. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.58:22–29.
187.
Stilwell, D. E., and T. J. Graetz. 2001. Copper, cadmium, and arsenic levels in soil near highway traffic sound barriers built using CCA pressure treated wood. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.67:303–308.
188.
Stone, M., and J. Marsalek. 1996. Trace metal composition and speciation in street sediment: Sault Ste. Marie, Canada. Water Air Soil Poll.87:149–169.
189.
Susten, A. E-mail to Belluck, with attachment (soil comparison values table for ATSDR evaluated chemicals), May 31, 2002.
190.
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.2000. Hazard assessment, environmental quality criteria, contaminated sites.Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
191.
Takahashi, Y., Y. Minai, S. Ambe, Y. Makide, and F. Ambe. 1999. Comparison of adorption behavior of multiple inorganic ions on kaolinite and silica in the presence of humic acid using the multitracer technique. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta63:815–836.
192.
Taylor, J. L., and P. A. Cooper. 2001. Effect of climate, species, preservative concentration and water repellent on leaching from CCA-treated lumber exposed above ground. 32nd Annual Meeting, Nara, Japan, May 20–25, 2001, Section 5, Environmental Aspects. IRG/WP 01–50178. International Research Group on Wood Preservatives. SE-100 44. Stockholm, Sweden: IRG Secretariat.
193.
Thanabalasingham, P., and W. F. Pickering. 1986. Arsenic sorption by humic acids. Environmental Pollution (Series B)12:233–246.
194.
Turpeinen, R., M. Virta, and M. M. Haggblom. 2002. Analysis of arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils. Appendix III. In Interactions between metals, microbes and plants-Bioremediation of arsenic and lead contaminated soils, ed. R. Turpeinen. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki. http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/mat/ekolo/vk/turpeinen/interact.pdf, accessed November 3, 2002.
195.
Tiller, K. G.1992. Urban soil contamination in Australia. Aust. J. Soil Res.30:937–957.
196.
Tom, P.-A. 2001. Good wood gone bad, special report on CCA-treated wood, Waste Age, 9 August. http://poisonwood.wasteage.com/ar/waste_good_wood_gone/, accessed November 3, 2002.
197.
Tonner-Navarro, L. E., N. C. Halmes, and S. M. Roberts. 1998. Technical report: Risk assessment of organic versus inorganic arsenic. CEHT/TR-98-01. Division of Waste Management. Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Gainesville, FL: Florida Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management. http://www.floridatox.org/Arsenic TR98–01.pdf, accessed November 3, 2002.
198.
Townsend, T., K. Stook, T. Tolaymat, J. K. Song, H. Solo-Gabriele, N. Hosein, and B. Khan. 2001. Metals concentrations in soils below decks made of CCA-treated wood. Gainesville, FL: Florida Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management. http://www.ccaresearch.org/decks.pdf, accessed November 3, 2002.
199.
University of Pennsylvania Health System. 2002. Description of services—toxicology (last updated July 29, 2002). http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/path/Lab Services/toxicology.html, accessed November 3, 2002.
200.
Ure, A. M., and M. L. Barrow. 1982. The elemental constituents of soils. In Environmental Chemistry, Volume 2, A Review of the Literature Published Up To Mid-1980, 94–204. London, UK: The Royal Society of Chemistry.
201.
USCPSC.1990. Project report, playground equipment—transmittal of estimate of risk to skin cancer from dislodgeable arsenic on pressure treated wood playground equipment. Washington, DC: United States Consumer Product Safety Commission. http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/pubs/325.pdf, accessed November 3, 2002.
202.
USDA.2001. Agricultural uses of municipal, animal, and industrial byproducts, ed. R. J. Wright. United States Department of Agriculture. Washington, DC: Agricultural Research Service.
203.
USDHHS. January 2001. 9th report on carcinogens, revised January 2001. National Toxicology Program. Public Health Service. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health and Human Services.
204.
USDOL.1999. Guidelines for medical surveillance & biological monitoring for miners exposed to arsenic, cadmium, lead & mercury.Washington, DC: United States Department of Labor.
205.
USEPA. No date. IRIS Quick view, arsenic, inorganic (last significant revision June 1, 1995). http://cfpub.epa.gov/iris/quickview.cfm? substance_nmbr=0278, accessed October 14, 2002.
206.
USEPA.1984. Occurrence of arsenic in drinking water, food, and air. PB95–183034. United States September 27, 1984. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
207.
USEPA. 1995. Construction and Demolition Waste Landfills. May 18, 1995 Draft Report. USEPA, Office of Solid Waste. February 1995.
208.
USEPA.1998. Study of hazardous air pollutant emissions from electric utility steam generating units—Final report to Congress, Volume 1. Research Triangle Park NC: U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality, Environmental Protection Planning and Standards Agency. EPA-453/R-98–004a. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency. February 1998.
209.
USEPA.1999. Screening level ecological risk assessment protocol for hazardous waste combustion facilities. Volume two. Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5305W) EPA530-D-99-001B. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency. August 1999.
210.
USEPA. 2000a. National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment, Results, Emissions, Data Tables. United States Environmental Protection Agency. August 29, 2000. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/nata/tablemis.html
211.
USEPA.2000b. Arsenic occurrence in public drinking water supplies. Office of Water (4607). EPA-815-R-00-023. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency. December 2000.
212.
USEPA.2001a. Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for Superfund sites. Peer review draft. Washington DC: Office of Solid Waste, OSWER 9355.4–24. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency. March 2001.
213.
USEPA. 2001b. State, tribal, and site identification center NPL site narrative at listing, Barber Orchard, Waynesville, North Carolina, In Federal Register, September 13, 2001.
214.
USEPA. 2002a. Notice of receipt of requests to cancel certain Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA) wood preservative products and amend to terminate certain uses of CCA products. In Federal Register, February 22, 2002.
215.
USEPA. 2002b. Arsenic compounds. Technology Transfer Network, Air Toxics Website (last updated July 30, 2002). http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/hlthef/arsenic.html, accessed November 3, 2002.
216.
USEPA. 2002c. Arsenic, inorganic. CASRN 7440–38–2. Integrated Risk Information System. United States Environmental Protection Agency (last updadated September 19, 2002). http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0278.htm, accessed October 14, 2002.
217.
USEPA. 2002d. 2000 public data release report. TRI 2000. United States Environmental Protection Agency (last updated August 6, 2002). http://www.epa.gov/triinter/tridata/tri00/pdr/, accessed November 4, 2002.
218.
USEPA Region 8. 2001. Arsenic trioxide. 20 Townships in Richland, Ransom and Sargent Counties, North Dakota Congressional District—At Large. CIRCLES ID-NDD980716963. United States Environmental Protection Agency (last updated June 8, 2001). http://www.epa.gov/region8/superfund/sites/arsenic_html, accessed on November 4, 2002.
219.
Valberg, P. A., B. D. Beck, T. S. Bowers, J. L. Keating, P. D. Bergstrom, and P. D. Boardman. 1997. Issues in setting health-based cleanup levels for arsenic in soil. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.26:219–229.
220.
Vowinkel, E. F., A. E. Grosz, J. L. Barringer, Z. Szabo, P. E. Stackelberg, J. A. Hopple, J. N. Grossman, E. A. Murphy, M. Serfes, and S. Spayd. 2001. Distribution of arsenic in the environment in New Jersey (abstract). Presented at USGS Workshop on Arsenic in the Environment, February 21–22, 2001, Denver, CO. USGS Arsenic Studies Group. Denver, CO: United States Geological Survey.http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/Arsenic/Final Abs PDF/vowinkel.pdf, accessed on November 4, 2002.
221.
Walker, S., and S. Griffin. 1998. Site-specific data confirm arsenic exposure predicted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Environ. Health Perspect.106:133–139.
222.
Walsh, L. M., and D. R. Keeney. 1975. Behavior and phytotoxicity of inorganic arsenicals in soils. In Arsenical pesticides, ACS Symposium Series 7, ed. E. A. Woolson, 35–52. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
223.
Walsh, L. M., M. E. Sumner, and D. R. Keeney. 1977. Occurrence and distribution of arsenic in soils and plants. Environ. Health Perspect.19:67–71.
224.
Warner, J. E., and K. R. Solomon. 1990. Acidity as a factor in leaching of copper, chromium and arsenic from CCA-treated dimension lumber. Environ. Toxicol. Chem.9:1331–1337.
225.
Water Environment Association of Ontario. 2001. Fate and significance of contaminants in sewage biosolids applied to agricultural land through literature review and consultation with stakeholder groups. Final Report. Water Environment Associate of Ontario (last revised November 1, 2002). http://res2.agr.ca/initiatives/manurenet/en/man_applic.html, accessed November 4, 2002.
226.
Wawrukiewicz, A. 1977. Validation studies of monte carlo modeling of children's pesticide and arsenic exposures due to residential soil contamination. Master's thesis, University of Washington, 1997.
227.
WDATCP.2001. Identifying and cleaning up sites contaminated with lead and arsenic from historic pesticide use.Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection.
228.
Weber, W. J., Y. C. Jang, T. G. Townsend, and S. Laux. 2002. Leachate from Land Disposed Residential Construction Waste. J. Environ. Engin.128:237–245.
229.
Welch, A. H., D. R. Helsel, M. J. Focazio, and S. A. Watkins. 1999. Arsenic in groundwater supplies of the United States. In Arsenic exposure and health effects, ed. W. R. Chappell, C. O. Abernathy, and R. L. Calderon, 9–17. New York, NY: Elsevier.
230.
Welch, A. H., D. B. Westjohn, D. R. Helsel, and R. B. Wanty. 2000. Arsenic in ground water of the United States: Occurrence and geochemistry. Ground Water38:589–604.
231.
Werner, K. L. 2001a. Wood preservatives: Groups urge arsenic-treated wood ban in playgrounds, government safety review, In BNA's Chemical Regulation Reporter News: Pesticides, 28 May.
232.
Werner, K. L. 2001b. Wood preservatives: Consumer Product Safety Commission, EPA, to develop research on CCA-treated wood. In BNA's Chemical Regulation Reporter News: Pesticides, 13 August.
233.
Whetzel, C. 2001. Arsenic: Playground equipment makers sued over arsenic levels in treated lumber. In BNA's Chemical Regulation Reporter News: Pesticides, 1 October.
234.
White, J. W.1999. Hazards of short-term exposure to arsenic contaminated soil. Office of Environmental Health Assessment Services. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Health.
235.
White, J. E-mail to Belluck, 9 January 2002.
236.
Wilson, A. 1997. Perspective: A call for CCA phase-out. In Environmental Building News, March 1997.
237.
Woolson, E. A., J. H. Axley, and P. C. Kearney. 1971. The chemistry and phytotoxicity of arsenic in soils: I. Contaminated field soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.35:938–943.
238.
World Health Organization.1996. Arsenic. In Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 2nd Edition, Volume 2, Health Criteria and Other Supporting Documentation, 156–167. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
239.
World Health Organization.2001a. Arsenic and arsenic compounds. Environmental Health Criteria 224. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
240.
World Health Organization.2001b. Exposure and health effects, chapter 3. In United Nations Synthesis Report on Arsenic in Drinking Water, ed. A. Morgan. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
241.
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe and European Environment Agency.2002. Children's health and environment: A review of evidence, ed. G. Tamburlini, O. S. von Ehrenstein, and R. Bertollini. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency. http://reports. eea.eu.int/environmental_issue_report_2002_29/en, accessed November 4, 2002.
242.
WSDA and WSDE. 1999. Report to the Legislature levels of nonnutritive substances in fertilizers (as required by RCW 15.54.433). Washington State Department of Agriculture and Washington State Department of Ecology. Olympia, WA: Washington State. http://www.wa.gov/agr/Pest Fert/ Publications/docs/2001 Nonnutritive Substances In Fertiliz ers.pdf, accessed on November 4, 2002.
243.
Xu, H., B. Allard, and A. Grimvall. 1991. Effects of acidification and natural organic materials on the mobility of arsenic in the environment. Water, Air and Soil Pollution57–58:2609–2278.
244.
Yan-Chu, H.1994. Arsenic distribution in soils. In Arsenic in the environment, Part I: Cycling and characterization, ed. J. O. Nriagu, 17–49. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
245.
Yewchuk, C. (Health Canada Pesticide Management Regulatory Agency). E-mail to Belluck, 1 August 2002.
