The High Tech MPA: Distance Learning Technology and Graduate Public Administration Education

Abstract

The technology of distance learning is in use in graduate MPA classes at a growing number of colleges and universities and is being considered for use at many others. This article explores the important objectives, issues, and concerns that should be addressed for the successful application of the technology and develops models of distance learning for graduate programs. The results of two preliminary surveys covering the use of distance learning technology in MPA programs are reported and analyzed. The authors present their findings concerning the development of successful distance learning programs at the graduate level and call for a consortium of university MPA programs to devise studies and share data and expertise in order to create quality distance learning programs for public administration education.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Journal of Distance Learning

1992–1996

Cozzetto

Don A.

Kweit

Robert W.

1995 “Using Interactive Video Technology in Graduate Programs in Public Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Education, 1(2), 116–129.

Gossett

Charles W.

1995 “Distance Learning and the Use of Interactive Television Teaching Public Administration.” Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Conference on Teaching Public Administration. Seattle, Washington. 6D1:1–9.

Green

Richard

1995 Presentation on the University of Wyoming MPA Program. Delivered at the Annual NASPAA Conference. Austin, Texas. October 1995.

Hackman

Michael Z.

Walker

Kim B.

1990 “Instructional Communication in the Televised Classroom.” Communication Education, 39 (July), 196–205.

Holden

Michael

Mitchell

William

1993 “The Future of Computer-Mediated Communication in Higher Education.” EDUCOM Review. 26(2), 31–37.

Honan

William H.

1995 “Professors Battling Television Technology.” The New York Times. April 4, 1995, 3.

Keegan

1986 The Foundations of Distance Education. London: Croom Helm.

Moore

M. G.

Thompson

M. M.

1990 Effects of Distance Learning: A Summary of Literature. University Park, PA: The American Center for the Study of Distance Education.

10.

NASPAA

1995 “Survey Results: Distance Learning Technologies.” Report of the National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration Standards Committee. September 1995.

11.

O'Neill

Robert J.

Jr.

1994 “Overview of the Department of Urban Studies and Public Administration of Old Dominion University.” April 12, 1994.

12.

Rifkind

Lawrence J.

1992 “Immediacy as a Predictor of Teacher Effectiveness.” Journal of Interactive Television. 1(1), April, 31–40.

13.

Rumble

1987 “Why Distance Education Can Be Cheaper Than Conventional Education.” Distance Education, 8; 1, 72–94.

14.

Ryan

Richard W.

1995 “Distance Education in Public Administration Programs.” Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Conference on Teaching Public Administration. Seattle, Washington, 1–15.

15.

Schlosser

Charles

Anderson

Mary

1993 Distance Education: Review of the Literature (working copy). Ames, Iowa: Research Institute for Studies in Education, College of Education, Iowa State University.

16.

Schon

Donald

1983 The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

17.

Souder

William E.

1993 “The Effectiveness of Traditional vs. Satellite Delivery in Three Management of Technology Master's Degree Programs.” The American Journal of Distance Education, 17, 37–53.

18.

Teletechnet

1994 “Old Dominion University Technology Network for Higher Education in the 21st Century.” Program description.

19.

Thomson

Michael J.

1995 “Combining TQM and Distance Learning Techniques in MPA Coursework.” Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Conference on Teaching Public Administration. Seattle, Washington. 6D2, 1–11.