MPA Alumni Assessment of Perceived Educational Outcomes: The “Value” of the MPA

Abstract

Although there is some agreement in the public administration education community about the goals and purposes of graduate work in public administration, there appears to be significant disagreement as to how we go about meeting these goals. This disagreement is manifested in the myriad of NASPAA accredited and affiliated programs with apparently different program foci, ideologies, and values. The convenience study reported here involved surveying alumni from two seemingly disparate MPA programs in order to compare alumni perceptions of their programs. Although the rhetoric of the programs would lead one to think that the alumni's program experiences would be very different, these two groups were more similar than expected with regard to their perceptions about what is important in their careers and how a MPA program can contribute to their careers. Implications for educational strategies of MPA programs are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Graduate Program in Public Administration—Self-study Report

1987–1993 1993 The Evergreen State College. Vol I, Olympia, WA.

NASPAA Self-study Report: Master of Public Administration , 1993 Department of Public Administration and Urban Studies, The University of Akron. Vol I, Akron, Ohio.

Proceedings; NASPAA Symposium on Outcomes Assessment

1992 Washington, DC: NASPAA.

Balfour

Danny L.

Marini

Frank

1991 “Child and Adult X and Y: Reflections of the Process of Public Administration Education.” Public Administration Review, 51, (6), 478–584.

Dennard

Linda

1995 “Asking Different Questions in the Search for Public Philosophy.” Administrative Theory and Practice, 17, (1), 46–54

Drucker

Peter

1994 “The Age of Social Transformation” Atlantic Monthly, 274, (3), 53–80.

Fox

Charles J.

Miller

Hugh T.

1994 Toward a Discourse Theory of Public Administration in Postmodernism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Goodnow

Frank

1900 Politics and Administration New York: Macmillan.

Harmon

Michael M.

1995 Responsibility as Paradox: A Critique of Rational Discourse on Government Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications

10.

Honey

John C.

1967 “A Report: Higher Education for Public Service.” Public Administration Review, 27, 301–318.

11.

Jennings

Edward T.

1989 “Accountability, Program Quality, Outcome Assessment, and Graduate Education for Public Affairs and Administration.” Public Administration Review, 49, (5), 438–446.

12.

O'Sullivan

Elizabethann

Rassel

Gary

1995 Research Methods for Public Administrators. White Plains, NY: Longman

13.

Poister

Theodore H.

Ingraham

Patricia

1992 “Assessing MPA Program Outcomes: Current Practice and Policy Alternatives.” Proceedings: NASPAA Symposium on Outcomes Assessment. Washington, DC: NASPAA.

14.

Stever

James A.

1988 The End of Public Administration: Problems of the Profession in the Post-Progressive Era. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Publishers.

15.

Stillman

Richard J.

1995 “The Refounding Movement in American Public Administration: From ‘Rabid’ Anti-statism to ‘Mere’ Anti-statism in 1990s.” Administrative Theory and Practice, 17, (1), 29–45.

16.

Ventriss

Curtis

1991 “Contemporary Issues in American Public Administration: The Search for an Educational Focus.” Public Administration Review, 51, (1) 4–14.

17.

Wamsley

Gary L.

1990 Refounding Public Administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

18.

Wilson

Woodrow

1887 “The Study of Administration.” Reprinted in Shafritz

J.M.

Hyde

A.C.

Classics of Public Administration. Chicago: The Dorsey Pres.