DerridaJ. (1986). Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences: Of grammatology: Difference. In AdamsH.SearleL. (Eds.), Critical theory since 1965 (pp. 83–137). Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University Press.
2.
HollingsworthS. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 160–189.
3.
MosenthalP. B. (1993). Understanding agenda setting in reading research. In SweetA. P.AndersonJ. I. (Eds.), Reading research into the year 2,000 (pp. 115–128). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
MosenthalP. B. (1995). Why there are no dialogues among the divided: The problem of solipsistic agendas in literacy research. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 574–577.
5.
StewartR. A. (1990). Factors influencing preservice teachers' resistance to content area reading. Reading Research and Instruction, 29 (4), 55–63.
6.
PailliotetWatts A. (1995). Seven elementary preservice teachers' perspectives of literacy: A longitudinal study. In HinchmanK. A.LeuD. J.KinzerC. K. (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice. Forty-fourth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 66–84). Chicago: National Reading Conference.