Several industrialized nations have conducted expensive door-to-door surveys of adult literacy. Following a critique of the role of knowledge in literacy, the research presented here examined the construct and action validity of the use of simple checklists to assess the declarative knowledge component of adult's literacy by telephone. Significant relationships were found among knowledge when assessed either by listening (telephone) or by reading (mailed questionnaire) modality. The telephone data showed similar relationships to demographic variables that have been found in the 1993 National Adult Literacy Survey and other literacy surveys during the last half-century. It was concluded that the telephone method may provide a valid, cost-effective alternative to door-to-door assessments of literacy.
References
1.
AllenL.CipielewskiJ.StanovichK.E. (1992). Multiple indicators of children's reading habits and attitudes: Construct validity and cognitive correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 489–503.
2.
BentonL.NoyelleT. (Eds.). (1992). Adult illiteracy and economic performance.Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Center for Educational Research and Innovation.
CampbellA.KirschI.S.KolstadA. (1992). Assessing literacy: The framework for the National Adult Literacy Survey.Washington, dc: National Center for Education Statistics.
5.
DillmanD.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method.New York: Wiley.
6.
EitelbergM.J. (1988). Manpower for military occupation.Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization.
7.
FaganW.T. (1994). Adult literacy surveys: A trans-border comparison. Journal of Reading, 38, 260–269.
8.
FreyJ.H. (1989). Survey research by telephone (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.
9.
GuthrieJ.T.BrittenT.BarkerK.G. (1991). Role of document structure and metacognitive awareness in the cognitive process of searching for information. Reading Research Quarterly, 226, 300–324.
10.
HealyA.F.McnamaraD.S. (1996). Verbal learning and memory: Does the modal model still work? In SpenceJ.DarleyJ.FossD. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 143–172). Palo Alto, ca: Annual Reviews.
11.
HirschE.D.Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12.
KazemekF.E. (1990). Adult literacy education: Heading into the 1990s. Adult Education Quarterly, 41, 53–62.
13.
KirschI.JungeblutA.JenkinsL.KolstadA. (1993). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey.Washington, dc: us Government Printing Office.
14.
KirschI.S.MosenthalP.B. (1990). Exploring document literacy: Variables underlying the performance of young adults. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 5–30.
15.
KrashenS. (1993). The power of reading: Insights from the research.Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
16.
KyllonenP.C.ChristalR.E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity. Intelligence, 14, 389–433.
17.
MessickS. (1988). The once and future issues of validity: Assessing the meaning and consequences of measurement. In WainerH.BraunH.I. (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 33–45). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
MessickS. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18, 5–11.
19.
MeyerB.J.F.MarsiskeM.WillisS.L. (1993). Text processing variables predict the readability of everyday documents read by older adults. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 235–248.
20.
MikuleckyL.DiehlW. (1980). Job literacy.Bloomington, in: Indiana University, School of Education, Reading Research Center.
21.
MosenthalP.B.KirschI.S. (1991). Toward an exploratory model of document literacy. Discourse Processes, 14, 147–180.
22.
MosenthalP.B.KirschI.S. (1994, November). Defining the proficiency standards of adult literacy in the us: A profile approach. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Syracuse, ny.
23.
NeiceD.AdsettM.RodneyW. (1992). Direct versus proxy measures of adult functional literacy: A preliminary reexamination. In BentonL.NoyelleT. (Eds.), Adult illiteracy and economic performance (pp. 69–87). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Center for Educational Research and Innovation.
24.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1995). Literacy, economy, and society.Paris: Author.
25.
Orr-HolleyL. (1992). Operation pdq: An ets pilot program.Jacksonville, FL: Florida Community College at Jacksonville, Urban Resource Center.
26.
PrinceC. (1994). Memorandum to members of the goal 3, goal 4, & goal 5 resource groups/technical planning subgroups.Washington, dc: National Governor's Association, National Education Goals Panel.
27.
RechtD.R.LeslieL. (1988). Effect of prior knowledge on good and poor reader's memory of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 16–20.
28.
RederS. (1994a). Practice-engagement theory: A sociocultural approach to literacy across languages and cultures. In FerdmanB.M.WeberR.M.RamirezA.G. (Eds.), Literacy across languages and cultures (pp. 33–74). New York: State University of New York Press.
29.
RederS. (1994b). Synthetic estimates of National Adult Literacy Survey literacy proficiencies from 1990 census microdata.Washington, dc: US Office of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education, Division of Adult Education and Literacy.
30.
RederS. (1995, April). Reder's report on readers in San Diego. The Community Exchange, p. 4.
31.
SalganikL.H.TalJ. (1989). A review and reanalysis of the ets/naep young adult literacy survey.Washington, dc: Pelavin Associates.
32.
ShankerA. (1996, January). Knowledge still counts. New York Times, p. E7.
33.
SinatraG.M. (1990). Convergence of listening and reading processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 115–130.
34.
StanovichK.E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray?Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7–29.
35.
StanovichK.E. (1993). Does reading make you smarter? Literacy and the development of verbal intelligence. In ReeseH. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 24). New York: Academic Press.
36.
StanovichK.E.CunninghamA.E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 211–229.
37.
StanovichK.E.WestR.F. (1994). Reply to Taylor. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 290–291.
38.
StichtT.G. (1978). The acquisition of literacy by children and adults. In MurrayF.PikulskyJ. (Eds.), The acquisition of reading (pp. 131–162). Baltimore, md: University Park Press.
39.
StichtT.G.ArmijoL.A.KoffmanN.RobersonK.WeitzmanR.ChangF.MoraccoJ. (1986). Teachers, books, computers, and peers: Integrated communications technologies for adult literacy development.Monterey, CA: us Naval Postgraduate School.
40.
StichtT.G.ArmstrongW.B. (1994). Adult Literacy in the United States: A compendium of quantitative data and interpretive comments.Washington, dc: National Institute for Literacy.
41.
StichtT.G.BeckL.HaukeR.KleimanG.JamesJ. (1974). Auding and reading: A developmental model.Alexandria, va: Human Resources Research Organization.
42.
StichtT.G.HookeL.R.CaylorJ.S. (1981). Literacy, oracy, and vocational aptitude as predictors of attrition and promotion in the armed services (Final Report 81–11, Humrro fr-etsd–81–11). Alexandria, va: Human Resources Research Organization.
43.
StichtT.G.JamesJ.H. (1984). Listening and reading. In PearsonP.BarrR.KamilM.MosenthalP. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 293–317). New York: Longman.
44.
StichtT.G.McdonaldB.A. (1992). Teaching adults to read. In SamuelsS.J.FarstrupA.E. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 314–334). Newark, de: International Reading Association.
45.
TaylorD. (1994). The trivial pursuit of reading psychology in the “real world”: A response to West, Stanovich, and Mitchell. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 277–288.
46.
VenezkyR.L.WagnerD.A.CilibertiB.S., (Eds.) (1990). Toward defining literacy.Newark, NJ: International Reading Association.
47.
WestR.F.StanovichK.E.MitchellH.R. (1993). Reading in the real world and its correlates. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 35–50.
