BerlinerD.C.BiddleB.J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, frauds, and the attack on America's public schools.Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
2.
BrownR. (1991). Schools of thought: How the politics of literacy shape thinking in the classroom.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Darling-HammondL.CobbV. (in press). The changing context of teacher education. In MurrayF. (Ed.), The teacher educator's handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
FerdmanB.M. (1990). Literacy and cultural identity. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 181–204.
5.
GarcíaG.E.PearsonP.D.JiménezR. (1994). The at-risk situation: A synthesis of reading literature (Special Report). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
6.
HermanJ.L.GolanS. (n.d.). The effects of standardized testing on teaching in schools.Los Angeles: The National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, UCLA Graduate School of Education.
7.
HiebertE.H. (1994). A small group intervention with Chapter 1 students. In HiebertE.H.TaylorB.M. (Eds.), Getting reading right from the start: Effective early literacy interventions (pp. 85–105). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
JuelC. (1994). Teaching phonics in the context of the integrated language arts (pp. 133–154). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
PinnellG.S.LyonsC.A.DefordD.E.BrykA.S.SeltzerM. (1994). Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high-risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 9–39.
10.
RothmanR. (1992, October 21). Study confirms “fears” regarding commercial tests. Education Week, 12(7), 1.
11.
SlavinR.E.KarweitN.L.MaddenN.A. (1989). Effective programs for students at risk.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
TaylorB. (1995, April). The early intervention in reading program: Results and issues spanning six years. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.