This study investigated children's reading strategies and progress when a meaning-based approach to reading instruction was implemented in a Finnish 1st-grade classroom. A reading program was designed in which the teacher introduced predictable books, literacy-related centers, and minilessons in context on selected letter-sound correspondences. Field notes and videotapes of individual reading sessions were analyzed to describe the strategies the students used while reading both familiar and unfamiliar books. In the fall, in a familiar context, the students read mostly based on their memory. In an unfamiliar context, the students used graphemic information and sounded out and elongated the words and named some letters. Later, they used their phonological recoding skills in both familiar and unfamiliar contexts. All the students progressed toward conventional reading, demonstrating that they had reached at least the alphabetic phase of reading development.
References
1.
AdamsM.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.
2.
BiemillerA. (1970). The development of the use of graphic and contextual information as children learn to read. Reading Research Quarterly, 6, 75–96.
3.
BridgeC.A.WinogradP.N.HaleyD. (1983). Using predictable materials vs. preprimers to teach beginning sight words. The Reading Teacher, 36, 884–891.
4.
ByrneB.Fielding-BarnsleyR. (1991). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 451–455.
5.
ChallJ.S. (1983). Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.
DurkinD. (1966). Children who read early: Two longitudinal studies. New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
EhriL.C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In BarrR.KamilM.L.MosenthalP.B.PearsonP.D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 383–417). New York: Longman.
9.
ElleyW.B. (1992). How in the world do students read? IEA study of reading literacy. Hamburg, Germany: The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
10.
FrancisH. (1984). Children's knowledge of orthography in learning to read. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 8–23.
11.
FrancisH. (1990a). Learning to read and write. In EntwistleN. (Ed.), Handbook of educational ideas and practices (pp. 732–740). London: Routledge.
12.
FrancisH. (1990b). Strategies and rules in learning to read and spell. In SpoeldersM. (Ed.), Literacy acquisition: A contribution of communication and cognition to the International Literacy Year (pp. 17–29). Lier, Belgium: J. Van In.
13.
GoodmanK.S. (1989). Whole-language: Foundations and development. Elementary School Journal, 90, 207–221.
14.
HarjolaT.LinnaH.MäkipääP.VuorensolaL. (1987). Aapinen [an alphabet book]. Helsinki: Werner Söderström.
15.
HarsteJ.C.WoodwardV.A.BurkeC.L. (1984). Language stories and literacy lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
16.
HiebertE.H. (1981). Developmental patterns and interrelationships of preschool children's print awareness. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 236–259.
17.
HoldawayD. (1979). The foundations of literacy. Sydney: Ashton Scholastic.
18.
HoldawayD. (1989). Shared book experience: Teaching reading using favorite books. In ManningG.ManningM. (Eds.), Whole language: Beliefs and practices, K–8 (pp. 137–150). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
19.
KorkeamäkiR.-L.DreherM.J. (1993). Finland, phonics, and whole language: Beginning reading in a regular letter-sound correspondence language. Language Arts, 70, 29–36.
20.
LehmuskallioK. (1991). “Miks lehdet tippuu puista?” Lapsi kysyjänäja lukijana alkuopetuksen päättymisvaiheessa [“Why do leaves fall off trees?” A child as a questioner and reader at the end of primary education]. (ACTA Universitatis Ouluensis Series E). Oulu, Finland: University of Oulu.
21.
LehtonenH. (1993). Lukutaidon kehittyminen ja sen yhteydet nimeämiseen, motivaatioon ja koulumenestykseen [The development of reading skill and its relationship to naming, motivation, and school achievement]. (ACTA Universitatis Tamperensis Series A, Vol. 380). Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.
22.
LinnakyläP. (1993). Exploring the secret of Finnish reading literacy achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 37, 63–74.
23.
LomaxR.G.McGeeL.M. (1987). Young children's concepts about print and reading: Toward a model of word reading acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 237–256.
24.
MasonJ.M. (1980). When do children begin to read: An exploration of four-year-old children's letter and word reading competencies. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 203–227.
25.
MasonJ.M.AllenJ.B. (1986). A review of emergent literacy with implications for research and practice in reading. In RothkopfE.Z. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 13, pp. 3–47). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
26.
MasonJ.M.HermanP.A.AuK.H. (1990). Children's developing knowledge of words (Technical Report No. 513). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
27.
MasonJ.M.KerrB.M.SinhaS.McCormickC. (1990). Shared book reading in an early start program for at-risk children. In ZutellJ.McCormickS. (Eds.), Literacy theory and research: Analysis from multiple paradigms. Thirty-ninth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 189–198). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
28.
MasonJ.M.SinhaS. (1992). Emerging literacy in the early childhood years: Applying a Vygotskian model of learning and development (Technical Report No. 561). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
29.
MasonJ.M.StewartJ. (1990). Emergent literacy assessment for instructional use in kindergarten. In MorrowL. M.SmithJ. K. (Eds.), Assessment for instruction in early literacy (pp. 155–173). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30.
MasonheimerP.E.DrumP.A.EhriL.C. (1984). Does environmental print identification lead children into word reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 257–271.
31.
McIntyreE. (1992). Young children's reading behaviors in various classroom contexts. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 339–371.
32.
MuuriA. (1994). Lasten päivähoito [Children's daycare] (Tilastotiedote 1994:6). Helsinki: STAKES.
33.
NupponenR. (1988). Huonosti lukevat ensiluokkalaiset opettajien ja vanhempien silmin [Poor readers in the first grade as seen by teachers and parents]. Kileikukko, No. 3–4, 7–9.
34.
PhillipsL.M.NorrisS.P.MasonJ.M.KerrB.M. (1990). Effects of early literacy intervention on kindergarten achievement. In ZutellJ.McCormickS. (Eds.), Literacy theory and research: Analysis from multiple paradigms. Thirty-ninth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 199–207). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
35.
ReutzelD.R.CooterR.B. (1990). Whole Language: Comparative effects on first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 252–257.
36.
RibowskyH. (1985). The effects of code emphasis approach and whole language approach upon emergent literacy of kindergarten children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 269 720).
37.
StahlS.A. (1992). Saying the “p”word: Nine guidelines for exemplary phonics instruction. The Reading Teacher, 45, 618–625.
38.
StanovichK.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
39.
StanovichK.E. (1991). Word recognition: Changing perspectives. In BarrR.KamilM.L.MosenthalP.B.PearsonP.D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 418–452). New York: Longman.
40.
StephensD. (1991). Research on whole language: Support for a new curriculum. Katonah, NY: Richard C. Owen.
41.
SulzbyE. (1985). Children's emergent reading of favorite storybooks: A developmental study. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 458–481.
42.
SulzbyE.TealeW. (1991). Emergent literacy. In BarrR.KamilM.L.MosenthalP.B.PearsonP.D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 727–757). New York: Longman.
43.
TealeW.H. (1982). Toward theory of how children learn to read and write naturally. Language Arts, 59, 555–570.
44.
VenezkyR.L. (1973). Letter-sound generalizations of first-, second-, and third-grade Finnish children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 288–292.
