This study compared the responses of two highly reluctant learning-disabled readers before and after they were helped to visualize story situations and events through visual art. These visual art procedures included the reading of illustrated books, the use of visual protocols, and the creation of symbolic story representations, illustrated books, collages, and picture maps regarding their reading. Data gathered from the students were subjected to ethnographic analysis, including preliminary and systematic domain searches, to reveal codes and themes. Data revealed that the use of visual art helped these two readers to begin enjoying reading, and to begin evoking and manipulating story worlds in their minds. The treatments encouraged the students not only to “see” what they were reading, but also to make other response moves involving emotional affect, connecting their own life to the literary experience, and the consideration of significance. Most importantly, perhaps, these students began to participate in the classroom community through their artwork.
References
1.
AndersonR. C. (1984). Role of the reader's schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. In AndersonR. C.OsbornJ.TierneyR. J. (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (pp. 243–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
ArthurR. (1960). Larceny and old lace. In NilesO. S. (Eds.), Skills for reading (pp. 161–168). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
3.
AtwellN. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading and learning with adolescents.Montclair, NJ: Boynton-Cook.
4.
BarnesD. (1986). Language, the learner and the school.London: Routledge.
5.
BarthesR. (1986). Image-Music-Text (HeathS., Trans.). New York: Hill & Wang.
6.
BelcherV. (1981). Mental imagery in basal manuals. Unpublished manuscript. University of Maryland, College Park.
7.
BentonM. (1983). Secondary Worlds. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 16(3), 68–75.
8.
BloorM. (1978). On the analysis of observational data: A discussion of the worth and uses of inductive techniques and respondent validation. Sociology, 12, 545–552.
9.
BlumerH. (1954). What is wrong with social theory?American Sociological Review, 19, 3–10.
10.
BransfordJ. (1979). Human cognition: Learning, understanding, and remembering.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
11.
BrittonJ. (1984). Message and text in poetic utterance. In MeekM.MillerJ. (Eds.), Changing English: Essays for Harold Rosen (pp. 220–235). London: Heinemann.
12.
BrunerJ. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13.
BurnsfordS. (1960; 1986). The incredible journey.New York: Bantam Starfire.
14.
CanneyG.WinogradP. (1979). Schemata for reading and reading comprehension performance.Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
15.
CiardiJ. (1975). The shark. In Fast and slow.New York: Houghton Mifflin.
16.
CromerW. (1970). The difference model: A new explanation for some reading difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 471–483.
DanemanM.CarpenterP. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–456.
19.
DurkinD. (1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481–533.
20.
EcoU. (1980). The Open Work.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
21.
EdmistonB. (1991). What have you travelled? A teacher researcher study of structuring drama for reflection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
22.
EisnerE. (1992). The misunderstood role of the arts in human development. Phi Delta Kappan, 591–595.
23.
EncisoP. [Edmiston]. (1990). The nature of engagement in reading: Profiles of three fifth graders engagement strategies and stances. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
24.
EncisoP. (1992, December). Accounting for engagement: Emerging principles for rethinking reading processes. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.
25.
GambrellL. (1981). Induced mental imagery and the text prediction performance of first and third graders. In NilesJ. A.HarrisL. A. (Eds.), New Inquiries in reading research and instruction. Thirty-first yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 131–135). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
26.
GambrellL.BalesR. J. (1986). Mental imagery and the comprehension-monitoring performance of fourth and fifth grade readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 454–464.
27.
GambrellL. B.HeathingtonB. S. (1981). Adult disabled readers' metacognitive awareness about reading tasks and strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 215–222.
28.
GambrellL.JawitzP. (1993). Mental imagery, text illustrations and children's story comprehension and recall. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 265–275.
29.
GardnerH. (1982). Art, mind and brain.New York: Basic Books.
30.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of mind.New York: Basic Books.
HansenJ. (1981). The effects of inference training and practice on young children's reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 391–417.
33.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in practice.London: Tavistock.
34.
HardingD. W. (1962). What happens when we read. British Journal of Aesthetics, 2(2), 133–147.
35.
HartL. (1984). Human brain and human learning.White Plains, NY: Longman.
36.
IserW. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
37.
JacobS. (1976). Contexts and images in reading. Reading World, 15, 167–175.
38.
JohnstonP.WinogradP. (1983, December). Passive failure in reading. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Austin, TX.
39.
KnappM.StearnsM.JohnM.ZuckerA. (1988). Prospects for improving K–12 science education from the federal level. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 677–683.
40.
LangerJ. (1984). Examining background knowledge and text comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 468–481.
41.
LoflandJ. (1967). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
42.
MasonJ.OsbornJ. (1982). When do children begin “reading to learn”: A survey of classroom reading instruction practices in grades two through five.Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
43.
MatuteA. (1968). The little boy whose friend died on him. In Los Ninos Tontos (p. 102). Spain: Ediciones Destino.
44.
NewellG. (1984). Learning from writing in two content areas: A case study/protocol analysis. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 265–287.
45.
O'FlahertyL. (1941). The sniper. In The modern short story (pp. 105–113). Boston: The Writer.
46.
OrnsteinA. (1990). The arts and the learning of high-risk individuals. Design for Arts in Education, 92(1), 25–45.
47.
PerfettiC. A.LesgoldA. M. (1979). Coding and comprehension in skilled reading and implications for instruction. In ResnickL. B.WeaverP. A. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 141–183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
PierceC. S. (1931; 1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Pierce (Vols. 1–6), HartshorneC.WeissP. (Eds.); (Vols. 7–8), BurksA. W. (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
Purcell-GatesV. (1991). On the outside looking in: A study of remedial-readers meaning-making while reading literature. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23, 235–254.
50.
QuammenD. (1985). The republic of cockroaches. In Natural acts (pp. 53–60). New York: Dell.
51.
ReidD. K. (1988). Teaching the learning disabled: A cognitive, developmental approach.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
52.
RobinsonG. (1991). Swish. In Read, 40(10), 16–19.
53.
RosenblattL. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: the transactional theory of the literary work.Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
54.
RosenblattL. (1982). The literary transaction: Evocation and response. Theory Into Practice, 21, 268–278.
55.
SadoskiM. (1985). The natural use of imagery in story comprehension and recall: replication and extension. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 658–667.
56.
SchwartzA. (1992). High beams. In Scary stories (pp. 38–47). New York: Harper-Collins.
57.
SmagorinskyP.CoppockJ. (1994). Cultural tools and the classroom context: An exploration of an artistic response to literature. Written Communication, 11, 283–310.
58.
SmithF. (1978). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
59.
SmithM. (1991). Constructing meaning from text: an analysis of ninth-grade reader responses. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 263–271.
60.
SmithM. (1992). Submission versus control in literary transactions. In ManyJ.CoxC. (Eds.), Reader stance and literary understanding: Exploring the theories, research and practice (pp. 143–161). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
61.
SpradleyJ. (1980). The ethnographic interview.New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
62.
TaylorM. (1976). Roll of thunder, hear my cry.New York: Dial.
63.
TolkienJ. R. R. (1964). On Fairy Stories. In Tree and Leaf (pp. 3–86). London: Allen & Unwin.
64.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society.ColeM.John-SteinerV.ScribnerS.SoubermanE. (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65.
WadeS. (1983). A synthesis of the research for improving research in social sciences. Review of Educational Research, 53, 461–479.
66.
WertschJ. (1991). Voices of the mind: a sociocultural approach to mediated action.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
WestlakeD. (1970). The Winner. In HarrisonH. (Ed.), Nova I (pp. 1–9). London: Knox, Burger Associates.
68.
WilhelmJ. (1994a). Developing readers: Teaching engaged and reflective reading in the middle school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
69.
WilhelmJ. (1994b). The inner game of reading. WSRA Journal, 38(3), 19–23.
70.
WitteS. (1992). Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9, 237–308.
