BeachR.GreenJ.KamilM.ShanahanT. (Eds.). (1992). Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research.Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English and National Conference of Teachers of English.
2.
BernhardtE. B. (in press). Comments on Kramsch paper. ADFL Bulletin..
3.
BronowskiJ. (1973). The ascent of man.Boston, MA: Little Brown.
4.
BronowskiJ. (1977). A sense of the future.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
EdelskyC. (1990). Whose agenda is this anyway? A response to McKenna, Robinson, and Miller. Educational Researcher, 19 (8), 7–11.
6.
FarnanN. (1994, July 29). Comments about courtesy and respect. (LISTSERV NRCEMAIL at ASUACAD.BITNET).
7.
GageN. (19S9). The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A historical sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 4–10.
8.
GreenJ. (1992). Multiple perspectives: Issues and directions. In BeachR.GreenJ.KamilM. L.ShanahanT. (Eds.), Multidisciplinary perspectives on literacy research (pp. 19–34). Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English and National Conference of Teachers of English.
9.
GrundinH. (1994). Who's romanticizing reality? A response to Keith Stanovich. Reading Teacher, 48, 8–9.
10.
GuttingG. (1980). Introduction. In GuttingG. (Ed.), Paradigms and revolutions: Appraisals and applications of Thomas Kuhn's philosophy of science (pp. 1–21). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
11.
HarrisonC. (1994, July 30). Comments about courtesy and respect. (LISTSERV NRCEMAIL at ASUACAD.BITNET).
12.
HarsteI. (1994, August 8). Comments about courtesy and respect. (LISTSERV NRCEMAIL at ASUACAD.BITNET).
13.
HoweK.EisenhartM. (1990). Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: A prolegomenon. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 2–9.
14.
KaestleC. (1993). The awful reputation of educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 23–31.
15.
KamilM. L. (1984). Current traditions of reading research. In PearsonP. D.BarrR.KamilM. L.MosenthalP. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 39–62). New York: Longman.
16.
KamilM. L. (1994). More on the Quality of Educational Research: A Response to Pressley and Harris. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 223–230.
17.
KamilM. L. (1994, May). Twelve items of concern with design, statistical procedures and analyses in research reports. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Association, Toronto, Canada.
18.
KamilM. L.LangerJ. A.ShanahanT. (1985). Understanding research in reading and writing.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
KuhnT. S. (1970). Reflections on my critics. In LakatosI.MusgraveA. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge.London: Cambridge University Press.
21.
KuhnT. S. (1977). Second thoughts on paradigms. In SuppeF. (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (2nd ed., pp. 459–482). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
22.
LangerS. K. (1957). Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
LysynchukL.PressleyM.d'AillyH.SmithM.CakeH. (1989). A methodological analysis of experimental studies of comprehension strategy instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 458–470.
24.
McKennaM.RobinsonR.MillerJ. (1990a). Whole language: A research agenda for the nineties. Educational Researcher, 19(8), 3–6.
25.
McKennaM.RobinsonR.MillerJ. (1990a). Whole language and the need for open inquiry: A rejoinder to Edelsky, Educational Researcher, 19(8), 12–13.
26.
MedawarP. (1979). Advice to a young scientist.New York: Harper & Row.
27.
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority: an experimental view.New York: Harper & Row.
28.
MillerS.FredericksM. (1991). Postpositivistic assumptions and educational research: Another view. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2–8.
29.
Montaigne deMichel (1987). Apologie de Raymond Sebond (An apology for Raymond Sebond translated and edited by M. A. Screech). London: Penguin.
30.
MosenthalP. (1993). Understanding agenda setting in reading research. In SweetA.AndersonJ. (Eds.), Reading research into the year 2000 (pp. 115–128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
MosenthalP. B.KamilM. L. (1991) Understanding progress in reading research. In BarrR.KamilM.MosenthalP.PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 2, pp. 1013–1046) New York: Longman.
32.
MosenthalP. B. (in press). Using large-scale assessments to set educational policy: An agenda-analytic approach. In WagnerD.TuijnmanA.KirschI. (Eds.), Adult basic skills: Innovations in measurement and policy analysis.New York: Hampton Press.
33.
MusgraveA. (1980). Kuhn's second thoughts. In GuttingG. (Ed.), Paradigms and revolutions: Appraisals and applications of Thomas Kuhn's philosophy of science (pp. 39–53). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
34.
PhillipsD. C. (1987). Philosophy, science and social inquiry.New York: Pergamon Press.
35.
PopkewitzT. (1984). Paradigm and ideology in educational research: The social functions of the intellectual.New York: Falmer Press.
36.
PressleyM.HarrisK. (1994). Increasing the quality of educational intervention research. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 191–208.
37.
RidgewayV.DunstonP.QuanG. (1993). A methodological analysis of teaching and learning strategy research at the secondary school level. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 334–349.
38.
SingerH.RuddellR. (Eds.). (1970). Theoretical models and processes of reading.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
39.
SkinnerB. F. (1956). A case history in the scientific method. American Psychologist, 11, 221–233.
40.
StahlS. (1994, July 29). Comments about courtesy and respect. (LISTSERV NRCEMAIL at ASUACAD.BITNET).
41.
StanovichK. (1990). A call for an end to the paradigm wars in reading research. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 221–231.
42.
StanovichK. (1993). Romance and reality. Reading Teacher, 47, 280–291.
43.
StanovichK. (1994, May). Research address. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Association, Toronto, Canada.
44.
TaylorD. (1994). The trivial pursuit of reading psychology in the “real world”: A response to West, Stanovich, and Mitchell. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 276–289.
45.
TierneyR. (1994, May). Research in a state of change: some shifts in literacy research. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Association, Toronto, Canada.
46.
WestR.StanovichK.MitchellH. (1993). Reading in the real world and its correlates. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 34–50.