In this study, we investigated the influence of metaphors on text processing. Sixty-two graduate students were randomly assigned to three conditions that varied in the degree of explicitness provided between a metaphor and new information, both presented in the text. Differences in comprehension and overall number of ideas recalled were trivial among the three groups. In addition, there was a lack of total change in recall over time. However, a significant effect was found for the time by group interaction. In addition, both type of idea (main and minor, and metaphoric-linked and non-linked) by group interactions were significant, with the metaphor groups recalling more. Text supplements, such as metaphors, can direct the reader's attention to certain types of ideas.
References
1.
ArkesH. R.FreedmanM. R. (1984). A demonstration of the costs and benefits of expertise in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 12, 84–89.
2.
AusubelD. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267–272.
3.
BoikR. J. (1993). The analysis of two-factor interactions in fixed effects linear models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18, 1–40.
4.
BransfordJ. D.FranksJ.VyeN. J.SherwoodR. D. (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can't be told. In VosniadouS.OrtonyA. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 470–497). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BransfordJ. D.SteinB. S.VyeN. J.FranksJ. J.AubleP. M.MezynskiK. J.PerfettoG. A. (1982). Differences in approaches to learning: An overview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 390–398.
6.
CermakL. S.CraikF. I. M. (Eds.). (1979). Levels of processing in human memory.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
ChiesiH. L.SpilichG. J.VossJ. F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 257–273.
8.
ClementJ. (1988). Observed methods for generating analogies in scientific problem solving. Cognitive Science, 12, 563–586.
9.
CollinsA.BursteinM. (1989). Afterword: A framework for a theory of comparison and mapping. In VosniadouS.OrtonyA. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 546–565). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
10.
CraikF. I. M.LockhartR. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
11.
van DijkT. A.KintschW. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension.Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
12.
DonnellyC. M.McDanielM. A. (1993). Use of analogy in learning scientific concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(4), 1–13.
13.
EvansG. E. (1988). Metaphors as learning aids in university lectures. Journal of Experimental Education, 56, 91–99.
14.
EvansR. D.EvansG. E. (1989). Cognitive mechanisms in learning from metaphors. Journal of Experimental Education, 58, 5–19.
15.
GentnerD. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
16.
GentnerD. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In VosniadouS.OrtonyA. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199–241). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17.
GentnerD.GentnerD. R. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In GentnerD.StevensA. L. (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 99–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
GickM. L.HolyoakK. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355.
19.
GickM. L.HolyoakK. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.
20.
GlynnS. M.BrittonB. K.Semrud-ClikemanM.MuthK. D. (1989). Analogical reasoning and problem solving in science textbooks. In GloverJ. A.RonningR. R.ReynoldsC. R. (Eds.), A handbook of creativity: Assessment, research, and theory (pp. 383–398). New York: Plenum Press.
21.
GoswamiU. (1991). Analogical reasoning: What develops? A review of research and theory. Child Development, 62, 1–22.
22.
HalpernD. F.HansenCRieferD. (1990). Analogies as an aid to understanding and memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 298–305.
23.
HayesD. A.HenkW. A. (1986). Understanding and remembering complex prose augmented by analogical and pictorial illustration. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 63–78.
24.
HayesD. A.TierneyR. J. (1982). Developing readers' knowledge through analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 256–280.
25.
HolyoakK.ThagardP. (1989). A computational model of analogical problem solving. In VosniadouS.OrtonyA. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 242–266). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.
27.
KierasD. E. (1982). A model of reader strategy for abstracting main ideas from simple technical prose. Text, 2, 47–82.
28.
KierasD. E. (1985). Thematic processes in the comprehension of technical prose. In BrittonB. K.BlackJ. B. (Eds.), Understanding expository text: A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text (pp. 89–107). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
KintschW. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
KrutchJ. W. (1957). The great chain of life.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
31.
KuhnT. S. (1979). Metaphor in science. In OrtonyA. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 409–419). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32.
MayerR. E. (1979). Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning?Review of Educational Research, 49, 371–383.
33.
MayerR. E. (1985). Structural analysis of science prose: Can we increase problem-solving performance? In BrittonB. K.BlackJ. B. (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 65–87). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
MayerR. E. (1987a). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach.Boston: Little, Brown.
35.
MayerR. E. (1987b). Instructional variables that influence cognitive processes during reading. In BrittonB.GlynnS. (Eds.), Executive control processes in reading (pp. 201–216). Hillsdale: LEA.
36.
MayerR. E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59, 43–64.
37.
MeyerB. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory.Amsterdam: North-Holland.
38.
MeyerB. J. F. (1985). Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problems. In BrittonB. K.BlackJ. B. (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 11–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39.
OppenheimerJ. R. (1965). Analogy in science. American Psychologist, 11, 127–135.
40.
PostmanL. (1971). Organizing and interference. Psychological Review, 78, 290–302.
41.
RederL. M.AndersonJ. R. (1980). A comparison of texts and their summaries: Memorial consequences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 121–134.
42.
RederL. M.CharneyD. H.MorganK. I. (1986). The role of elaborations in learning a skill from an instructional text. Memory and Cognition, 14, 64–78.
43.
ReedS. K.ErnstG. W.BanerjiR. (1974). The role of analogy in transfer between similar problem states. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 436–450.
44.
SchustackM. W.AndersonJ. R. (1979). Effects of analogy to prior knowledge on memory for new information. Journal of Verbal Behavior and Verbal Learning, 18, 565–583.
45.
SeamanM. A.LevinJ. R.SerlinR. C. (1991). New developments in pairwise multiple comparisons: Some powerful and practicable procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 577–586.
46.
TurnerA.GreeneE. (1977). The construction and use of a propositional text base (Technical Report No. 63). Boulder, CO: Institute for the Study of Intellectual Behavior.
47.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1982). Evidential impact of base rates. In KahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA. (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 153–162). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
48.
VosniadouS.OrtonyA. (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning: A synthesis. In VosniadouS.OrtonyA. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 1–17). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49.
VosniadouS.SchommerM. (1988). Explanatory analogies can help children acquire information from expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 524–536.
50.
WeinsteinC. E. (1978). Elaboration skills as a learning strategy. In O'NeilH. F.Jr. (Ed.), Learning strategies.New York: Academic Press.
51.
YarbroughD. B.GagnéE. D. (1987). Metaphor and the free recall of technical text. Discourse Processes, 10, 81–91.
