This study investigated the effectiveness of instruction in story mapping as a means to promote first-grade students' comprehension of central story elements in children's literature. Participants were 74 children in four first-grade classrooms, which were randomly assigned to one of four groups: (a) a Story Mapping 1 (SM1) group, in which students were taught to construct story maps for unadapted, unabridged children's stories they had read; (b) a Story Mapping 2 (SM2) group, which involved the same instruction as SM1 but included using story maps to compose stories; (c) a Directed Reading-Thinking Activity (DRTA) comparison strategy group, in which students read the same stories according to a predict-verify procedure; or (d) a directed reading activity (DRA) instructed control group, in which students engaged in a noninteractive, guided reading of stories. Quantitative analyses were conducted on five whole-sample dependent measures: an important idea test on a parsed story, a wh-question test of central story elements, a summary selection task, an important story element recognition test, and a delayed wh-question test. Results revealed that (a) some form of active comprehension instruction (SM1, SM2, or DRTA) was superior to the control-group DRA on most measures, (b) story mapping (SM1 and SM2) students consistently outperformed DRA controls, (c) story mapping was superior to DRTA on some measures but not on others, and (d) SM1 and SM2 groups did not differ on any measure. Qualitative data from student interviews generally supported these findings. It was concluded that instruction in story mapping is an effective instructional strategy for promoting first-grade students' ability to identify central narrative elements in authentic children's literature.
References
1.
AndersonR. C.WilkinsonI. A. G.MasonJ. M.ShireyL. (December 1987). Prediction versus word-level questions. In AndersonR. C.ChairExperimental investigations of prediction in small-group reading lessons. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, St. Petersburg, FL.
2.
ApplebeeA. N. (1978). A child's concept of story.Chicago: Chicago University Press.
3.
BakerL.SteinN. (1981). The development of prose comprehension skills. In SantaC. M.HayesB. L. (Eds.), Children's prose comprehension: Research and practice (pp. 7–43). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
4.
BallardP. Q. (1988). The effects of narrative instruction on the comprehension abilities of eighth-grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
5.
BaumannJ. F. (1986). Silver Burdett & Ginn comprehension workbook C.Needham Heights, MA: Silver Burdett & Ginn.
6.
BaumannJ. F. (1988). Reading assessment: An instructional decision-making perspective.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
7.
BaumannJ. F.BallardP. J. (1987). A two step model for promoting independence in comprehension. Journal of Reading, 30, 608–612.
8.
BaumannJ. F.SchmittM. B. (1986). The what, why, how, and when of comprehension instruction. Reading Teacher, 39, 640–646.
9.
BaumannJ. F.Seifert-KessellN.JonesL. A. (1992). Effect of think-aloud instruction on elementary students' comprehension monitoring abilities. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 143–172.
10.
BeckI. (1984). Developing comprehension: The impact of the Directed Reading Lesson. In AndersonR. C.OsbornJ.TierneyR. J. (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (pp. 3–20). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
BeckI. K.OmansonR. C.McKeownM. G. (1982). An instructional redesign of reading lessons: Effects on comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 462–481.
12.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G. (1981). Developing questions that promote comprehension: The story map. Language Arts, 17, 913–918.
13.
BlackJ. B.WilenskyR. (1979). An evaluation of story grammars. Cognitive Science, 3, 213–230.
14.
BlairS. (1963). The three Billy-Goats Gruff.Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
15.
BowmanM. A. (1981). The effect of story structure questioning upon the comprehension and metacognitive awareness of sixth grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
16.
BraunC.GordonC. J. (1984). Writing instruction as a metatextual aid to story schema applications. In NilesJ. A.HarrisL. A. (Eds.), Changing perspectives on research in reading/language processing and instruction. Thirty-third yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 61–65). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
17.
BromleyK. D. (1991). Webbing with literature: Creating story maps with children's books.Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
18.
BruceB. (1978). What makes a good story?Language Arts, 55, 460–466.
19.
BussR. R.RatliffJ. L.IrionJ. C. (1985). Effects of instruction on the use of story structure in comprehension of narrative discourse. In NilesJ. A.HarrisL. A. (Eds.), Issues in literacy: A research perspective. Thirty-fourth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 55–58). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
20.
CairneyT. H. (1990). Intertextuality: Infectious echoes from the past. Reading Teacher, 43, 478–484.
21.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.Chicago: Rand McNally.
22.
CarnineD.KinderB.D. (1985). Teaching low-performing students to apply generative and schema strategies to narrative and expository material. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 20–30.
23.
ClarkC. H. (1982). Assessing free recall. Reading Teacher, 35, 434–439.
24.
CuddE. T.RobertL. L. (1987). Using story frames to develop reading comprehension in a first grade classroom. Reading Teacher, 41, 74–81.
25.
CunninghamJ.FosterE. O. (1978). The ivory tower connection: A case study. Reading Teacher, 31, 365–369.
26.
DeGroffL.GaldaL. (1992). Responding to literature: Activities for exploring books. In CullinanB. E. (Ed.), Invitation to read: More children's literature in the reading program (pp. 122–137). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
27.
DiminoJ.GerstenR.CarnineD.BlakeG. (1990). Story grammar: An approach for promoting at-risk secondary students' comprehension of literature. Elementary School Journal, 91, 19–32.
28.
DreherM. J.SingerH. (1980). Story grammar instruction is unnecessary for intermediate grade students. Reading Teacher, 34, 261–268.
29.
EastmanP. D. (1960). Are you my mother?New York: Random House.
30.
FieldingL. G.AndersonR. C.PearsonP. D. (January, 1990). How discussion questions influence children's story understanding (Tech. Rep. No. 490). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
31.
FitzgeraldJ. (1989). Research on stories: Implications for teachers. In MuthK. D. (Ed.), Children's comprehension of text: Research into practice (pp. 2–36). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
32.
FitzgeraldJ. (1992). Reading and writing stories. In IrwinJ. W.DoyleM. A. (Eds.), Reading/writing connections: Learning from research (pp. 81–95). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
33.
FitzgeraldJ.SpiegelD. L. (1983a). The development of knowledge of social intentions, plans, and resolutions as reflected in story productions and recall of scrambled stories. In NilesJ. A.HarrisL. A. (Eds.), Searches for meaning in reading/language processing and instruction. Thirty-second yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 192–198). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
34.
FitzgeraldJ.SpiegelD. L. (1983b). Enhancing children's reading comprehension through instruction in narrative structure. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 1–17.
35.
FitzgeraldJ.TeasleyA. B. (1986). Effects of instruction in narrative structure on children's writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 424–433.
36.
FreemanD. (1978). A pocket for Corduroy.New York: Scholastic.
37.
GambrellL. B.ChasenS. P. (1991). Explicit story structure instruction and the narrative writing of fourth- and fifth-grade below-average readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 31, 54–62.
38.
GordonC. J. (1989). Teaching narrative text structure: A process approach to reading and writing. In MuthK. D. (Ed.), Children's comprehension of text: Research into practice (pp. 79–102). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
39.
GordonC. J.BraunC. (1982). Story schemata: Metatextual aid to reading and writing. In NilesJ. A.HarrisL. A. (Eds.), New inquiries in reading and instruction. Thirty-first yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 262–268). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
40.
GordonC. J.BraunC. (1983). Using story schema as an aid to reading and writing. Reading Teacher, 37, 116–121.
41.
GraesserA.GoldingJ. M.LongD. L. (1991). Narrative representation and comprehension. In BarrR.KamilM. L.MosenthalP.PearsonP. D. (Eds), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 171–205). New York: Longman.
42.
GreenewaldJ. M.RossingR. L. (1986). Short-term and long-term effects of story grammar and self-monitoring training on children's story comprehension. In NilesJ. A.LalikR. V. (Eds), Solving problems in literacy: Learners, teachers, and researchers. Thirty-fifth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 210–213). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
43.
HansenJ. (1981). The effects of inference training and practice on young children's reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 391–417.
44.
HansenJ.PearsonP. D. (1983). An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of good and poor fourth-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 821–829.
45.
HartmanD. K. (1986). Macrostructure processing: How direct story grammar instruction affects comprehension. Unpublished master's thesis, California State University, Fresno.
46.
HughesS. (1981). Alfie gets in first.New York: Morrow.
47.
IdolL. (1987). Group story mapping: A comprehension strategy for both skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 196–205.
48.
IrwinJ. W.BakerI. (1989). Promoting active reading comprehension strategies: A resource book for teachers.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
49.
KeatsE. J. (1964). Whistle for Willie.New York: Viking.
50.
LehnertW. G. (1982), Plot units: A narrative summarization strategy. In LehnertW. G.RingleM. R. (Eds.), Strategies for natural language processing (pp. 375–412). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
LobelA. (1970). Frog and Toad are friends.New York: Harper & Row.
52.
LysynchukL. M.PressleyM.d'AillyH.SmithM.CakeH. (1989). A methodological analysis of experimental studies of comprehension strategy instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 458–470.
53.
MandlerJ. M.JohnsonM. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151.
54.
ManheimH. L. (1977). Sociological research: Philosophy and methods.Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
55.
MarshallN. (1983). Using story grammar to assess reading comprehension. Reading Teacher, 36, 616–620.
56.
McConaughyS. (1980). Using story structure in the classroom. Language Arts, 57, 157–165.
57.
McNeilJ. D. (1992). Reading comprehension: New directions for classroom practice (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
58.
MoffettJ. (1983). Teaching the universe of discourse.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
59.
MorrowL. M. (1984). Reading stories to young children: Effects of story structure and traditional questioning strategies on comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 273–288.
60.
MorrowL. M. (1986). Effects of structural guidance in story retelling on children's dictation of original stories. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 135–152.
61.
NolteR. Y.SingerH. (1985). Active comprehension: Teaching a process of reading comprehension and its effects on reading achievement. Reading Teacher, 39, 24–31.
62.
ParisS. G.LipsonM. Y.WixsonK. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293–316.
63.
PattonM. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
64.
PearsonP. D. (1982). Asking questions about stories. (Occasional Paper No. 15). Lexington, MA: Ginn and Co.
65.
PearsonP. D.FieldingL. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In BarrR.KamilM. L.MosenthalP.PearsonP. D. (Eds), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 814–860). New York: Longman.
66.
Rabbit and the long one: A Masai folktale. (1985). In Birds fly, bears don't.Lexington, MA: Ginn.
67.
RandM. K. (1984). Story schema: Theory, research, and practice. Reading Teacher, 37, 377–383.
68.
ReutzelR. D. (1985). Story maps improve comprehension. Reading Teacher, 38, 400–404.
69.
RumelhartD. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In SpiroR. J.BruceB. C.BrewerW. F. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
70.
SchmittM. C. (1988). The effects of a elaborated directed reading activity on the metacomprehension skills of third graders. In ReadenceJ. E.BaldwinR. S. (Eds.), Dialogues in literacy research. Thirty-seventh yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 167–181). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
71.
SchmittM. C.O'BrienD. G. (1986). Story grammars: Some cautions about the translation of research into practice. Reading Research and Instruction, 26, 1–8.
72.
SebestaS. L.CalderJ. W.ClelandL. N. (1982). A story grammar for the classroom, Reading Teacher, 36, 180–184.
73.
ShortE. J.RyanE. B. (1984). Metacognitive differences between skilled and less skilled readers: Remediating deficits through story grammar and attribution training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 225–235.
74.
SingerH.DonlanD., (1982). Active comprehension: Problem-solving schema with question generation for complex short stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 166–187.
75.
SpiegelD. L.FitzgeraldJ. (1986). Improving reading comprehension through instruction about story parts. Reading Teacher, 39, 676–682.
76.
Stahl-GemakeJ.GuastelloF. (1984). Using story grammar with students of English as a foreign language to compose original fairy and folktales. Reading Teacher, 38, 213–216.
77.
StaufferR. G. (1969). Directing reading maturity as a cognitive process.New York: Harper & Row.
78.
StaufferR. G. (1976). Teaching reading as a thinking process.New York: Harper & Row.
79.
SteinGlenn (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In FreedleR. O. (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (Vol. 2, pp. 53–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
80.
TallonR. (1977). Fish story.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
81.
ThorndykeP. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77–110.
82.
TierneyR. J.ReadenceJ. E.DishnerE. K. (1990). Reading strategies and practices (3rd. ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
83.
WeaverP.DickinsonD. K. (1982). Scratching below the surface: Exploring the usefulness of story grammars. Discourse Processes, 5, 225–243.
84.
WeissL. (1976). Heather's feathers.New York: Franklin Watts.
85.
WhaleyJ. F. (1981a). Readers' expectations for story structure. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 90–114.
86.
WhaleyJ. F. (1981b). Story grammars and reading instruction. Reading Teacher, 34, 762–771.
87.
WilsonR. M.GambrellL. B. (1988). Reading comprehension in the elementary school: A teacher's practical guide.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
88.
YussenS. R.MatthewsS. R.BussR.R.KaneP. T. (1980). Developmental change in judging important and critical elements of stories. Developmental Psychology, 16, 213–219.
89.
ZionG. (1958). No roses for Harry.New York: Harper & Row.
90.
ZolotowC. (1962). Mr. Rabbit and the lovely present.New York: Harper & Row.
