Placement in a reading group determines: (a) the materials a child sees during reading instruction, (b) the pace at which a child proceeds through reading materials, and (c) the peers a child interacts with during reading instruction. The current study examined these effects of reading group placement upon the individual's growth in reading during first and second grade. The study also examined how children were initially placed in reading groups. A secondary analysis of data collected by Juel, Griffith, and Gough (1986) and Juel (1988) was performed. Initial first-grade placements were found to be primarily based on standardized reading readiness tests. Children rarely changed groups. The correlations between place in basal series at the end of first grade and place in series at both the beginning and end of second grade were .77. Children with low incoming readiness test scores developed better decoding skills when placed in a basal series with fewer unique words. Initial aptitude, growth during first grade in decoding skills, and a high success rate in learning basal words influenced first grade reading achievement considerably more than sheer basal coverage or certain peer group characteristics. Only after basic reading skill was acquired did group placement begin to adversely affect reading development—if it constrained exposure to text in second grade.
References
1.
AllingtonR. L. (1980). Teacher interruption behaviors during primary-grade oral reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 371–377.
2.
AllingtonR. L. (1984). Content coverage and contextual reading in reading groups. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 85–96.
3.
AlpertJ. L. (1974). Teacher behavior across ability groups: A consideration of the mediation of pygmalion effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 348–353.
4.
American book company reading program. (1980). New York: American Book Company.
5.
AndersonL.EverstonC.BrophyJ. (1979). An experimental study of effective teaching in first-grade reading groups. Elementary School Journal, 79, 193–223.
6.
AuK. H. (1980). A test of the social organizational hypothesis: Relationships between participation structures and learning to read. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana.
7.
BarrR. C. (1973-1974). Instructional pace differences and their effect on reading acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 9, 526–554.
8.
BarrR.DreebenR. (1983). How schools work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BeckI. L. (1981). Reading problems and instructional practices. In MackinnonG. E.WallerT. G. (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 53–95). New York: Academic Press.
10.
BerlinerD. C. (1981). Academic learning time and reading achievement. In GuthrieJ. T. (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 203–226). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
11.
BrophyJ. E.GoodT. (1969). Teacher-child dyadic interaction: A manual for coding classroom behavior. Austin: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas at Austin.
12.
BryantN. D. (1975). Diagnostic test of basic decoding skills. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
13.
CazdenC. B. (1981). Social context of learning to read. In GuthrieJ. T. (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 118–139). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
14.
CollinsJ. (1982). Differential treatment in reading groups. Final report of school-home ethnography project (Report No. G-78-0082). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
15.
FisherC. W.FilbyN. N.MarliaveR. S.CahenL. S.DishawM. M.MooreJ. E.BerlinerD. C. (1978). Teaching behaviors, academic learning time and student achievement (Tech. Rep. No. V-1). San Francisco: Far West Regional Laboratory.
16.
GambrellL. (1984). How much time do children spend reading during teacher-directed reading instruction? In NilesJ.HarrisL. (Eds.) Changing perspectives on research in reading/language processing and instruction (pp. 193–198). Thirty-third Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Rochester, NY: The National Reading Conference.
17.
GambrellL. B.WilsonR. M.GanttW. N. (1981). Classroom observations of task-attending behaviors of good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Research, 74, 400–404.
18.
GamoranA. (1987). Organization, instruction, and the effects of ability grouping: Comment on Slavin's “best-evidence synthesis”. Review of Educational Research, 57, 341–345.
19.
GatesA. I.MacGinitieW. H. (1965). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests. New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
GatesA. I.RussellD. H. (1938). Types of materials, vocabulary burden, word analysis, and other factors in beginning reading, part II. Elementary School Journal, 39, 119–128.
21.
HiebertE. H. (1983). An examination of ability grouping for reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 231–255.
22.
HiebertE. H. (1987). The context of instruction and student learning: An examination of Slavin's assumptions. Review of Educational Research, 57, 337–340.
23.
HieronymousA. N.LindquistE. F.HooverH. D. (1980). Iowa test of basic skills (Primary Battery, Form 7). New York: Houghton Mifflin.
24.
HoffmanJ. V.BakerC. (1981). Characterizing teacher feedback to student miscues during oral reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 34, 907–913.
25.
JastakJ.BijouS.JastakS. (1978). Wide range achievement test. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
26.
JuelC. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447.
27.
JuelC.GriffithP. L.GoughP. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255.
28.
JuelC.Roper/SchneiderD. (1985). The influence of basal readers on first grade reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 134–152.
29.
McDermottR. (1976). Kids make sense: Ethnographic account of the interactional management of success and failure in one first grade classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford, University, Palo Alto.
PflaumS. W.PascarellaE. T.BoswickM.AuerC. (1980). The influence of pupil behavior and pupil status factors on teacher behaviors during oral reading lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 99–105.
32.
RistR. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 411–451.
33.
Roper/SchneiderH. D. W. (1984). Spelling, word recognition, and phonemic awareness among first grade children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
34.
RosenshineB.StevensR. (1984). Classroom instruction in reading. In PearsonP. D. (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 745–798). New York: Longman.
ShareD. L.JormA. F.MacleanR.MatthewsR. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.
37.
SlavinR. E. (1987a). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 293–336.
38.
SlavinR. E. (1987b). Ability grouping in elementary schools: Do we really know nothing until we know everything?Review of Educational Research, 57, 347–350.
39.
WeinsteinR. S. (1976). Reading group membership in first grade: Teacher behaviors and pupil experience over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 103–116.
40.
WestC. K.AndersonT. H. (1976). The question of preponderant causation in teacher expectancy research. Review of Educational Research, 46, 613–630.
41.
WillowsD. M.BorwickD.HayvrenM. (1981). The content of school readers. In MackinnonG. E.WallerT. G. (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 97–175). New York: Academic Press.
