Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In order to investigate whether or not the interpretation of figurative passages presented a comprehension problem unique to that of any difficult text, 50 undergraduate education majors were asked to read and interpret a nonliteral comparison passage and two researcher-constructed figurative passages. Subjects took pretests to measure their general vocabulary knowledge and inferencing ability. Performance on these measures was compared with abilities considered unique to the comprehension of figurative expressions. A set of quantitative analyses indicated that the figurative-unique abilities could not definitively account for the interpretation of both figurative passages. However, an additional qualitative analysis of interviews conducted with 10 of the subjects indicated that figurative unique abilities identified in previous research with isolated figurative expressions were operating during the interpretation of the figurative passages used in this study. The study illustrates the benefit of combining quantitative and qualitative methods to answer basic research questions about text comprehension.

References

Anderson

R. C.

Freebody

(1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In Guthrie

J. T.

(Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Baldwin

R. S.

Luce

T. S.

Readence

J. E.

(1982). The impact of subschemata on metaphorical processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 528–543.

Bartel

(1983). Metaphors and symbols: Forays into language. Urbana, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English.

Black

(1962). Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Brown

J. I.

Bennett

J. M.

(1981). Nelson-Denny Reading Test: Vocabulary-comprehension-rate, Form F. Lombard, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.

Friedman

(1972). Imagery: From sensation to symbol. In Shibles

(Ed.), Essays on metaphor (pp. 41–59). Whitewater, Wisconsin: The Language Press.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1978). Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

McKeon

(Ed.). (1947). Introduction to Aristotle. New York: Random House.

Murray

I. M.

(1972). Metaphor. In Shibles

(Ed.), Essays on metaphor (pp. 27–39). Whitewater, Wisconsin: The Language Press.

10.

O'Brien

D. G.

(1984). The relation between surface processing variables and comprehension product measures in oral and silent reading. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 06A–1704 (University Microfilms No. DA8421139).

11.

O'Brien

D. G.

(1986). A test of three hypotheses posed to explain the relation between word knowledge and comprehension. In Niles

J. A.

Lalik

R. V.

(Eds.), Solving problems in literacy: Learners, teachers, and researchers. Thirty-fifth Yearbook of The National Reading Conference. Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.

12.

Ortony

(1979). Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review, 86, 161–180.

13.

Ortony

(1980). Metaphor. In Spiro

R. J.

Brace

B. C.

Brewer

W. F.

(Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 349–365). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

14.

Ortony

(1984). Understanding figurative language. In Pearson

P. D.

(Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 453–470). New York: Longman.

15.

Ortony

Reynolds

R. E.

Arter

J. A.

(1978). Metaphor: Theoretical and empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 919–943.

16.

Patton

M. Q.

(1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

17.

Pearson

P. D.

Johnson

D. D.

(1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

18.

Readence

J. E.

Baldwin

R. S.

Martin

M. A.

O'Brien

D. G.

(1984). Metaphorical interpretation: An investigation of the salience imbalance hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 659–667.

19.

Readence

J. R.

Baldwin

R. S.

Rickelman

R. J.

(1983). Word knowledge and metaphorical interpretation. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 349–358.

20.

Reynolds

R. E.

Ortony

(1980). Some issues in the measurement of children's comprehension of metaphorical language. Child Development, 51, 1110–1119.

21.

Richards

I. A.

(1936). The philosophy of rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.

22.

Tourangeau

Sternberg

R. J.

(1981). Aptness in metaphor. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 27–55.

23.

Tversky

(1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.

Does Figurative Language Present a Unique Comprehension Problem?

Abstract

References