Two experiments investigated how providing remedial readers with information that strategy use improves performance influenced their self-efficacy and comprehension skill. In both studies, children were given training on finding main ideas. Children in Experiment 1 received specific strategy value information, general strategy value information, specific plus general (combined) information, or no strategy value information. In Experiment 2, children received strategy effectiveness feedback, specific strategy value information, or feedback plus specific (combined) information. In each study, the combined treatment enhanced self-efficacy and skill better than the other conditions, which did not differ. These results suggest that remedial readers may not benefit much from minimal information on how strategy use can improve performance. Multiple sources of strategy value information may be necessary to enhance self-efficacy and comprehension skill.
References
1.
BakerL.BrownA. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In PearsonP. D. (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). New York: Longman.
2.
BanduraA. (1982). The self and mechanisms of agency. In SulsJ. (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
BorkowskiJ. G.CavanaughJ. C. (1979). Maintenance and generalization of skills and strategies by the retarded. In EllisN. R. (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency, psychological theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 569–617). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
BorkowskiJ. G.LeversS.GruenenfelderT. M. (1976). Transfer of mediational strategies in children: The role of activity and awareness during strategy acquisition. Child Development, 47, 779–786.
6.
BorkowskiJ. G.VarnhagenC. K. (1984). Transfer of learning strategies: Contrast of self-instructional and traditional training formats with EMR children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 369–379.
7.
BrownA. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In SpiroR. J.BruceB. C.BrewerW. F. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453–481). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
BrownA. L.CampioneJ. C.DayJ. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10, 14–20.
9.
BrownA. L.PalincsarA. S.ArmbrusterB. B. (1984). Instructing comprehension-fostering activities in interactive learning situations. In MandlH.SteinN. L.TrabassoT. (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 255–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
ButkowskyI. S.WillowsD. M. (1980). Cognitive-motivational characteristics of children varying in reading ability. Evidence for learned helplessness in poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 408–422.
11.
CohenS. A.ForemanD. I. (1978). Scoring high in reading. New York: Random House.
12.
CornoL.MandinachE. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88–108.
13.
CovingtonM. V.BeeryR. G. (1976). Self-worth and school learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
14.
EdwardsA. L. (1984). An introduction to linear regression and correlation (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Freeman.
15.
FabriciusW. V.HagenJ. W. (1984). Use of causal attributions about recall performance to assess metamemory and predict strategic memory behavior in young children. Developmental Psychology, 20, 975–987.
16.
FlavellJ. H. (1985). Cognitive development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17.
GoethalsG. R.DarleyJ. M. (1977). Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. In SulsJ. M.MillerR. L. (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 259–278). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
18.
HarrisK. R. (1982). Cognitive-behavior modification: Application with exceptional children. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15, 1–16.
19.
KendallP. C.FinchA. J.Jr. (1979). Developing nonimpulsive behavior in children: Cognitive-behavioral strategies for self-control. In KendallP. C.HollonS. D. (Eds.), Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Theory, research, and procedures (pp. 37–79). New York: Academic Press.
20.
KendallP. C.WilcoxL. E. (1980). Cognitive-behavioral treatment for impulsivity: Concrete versus conceptual training in non-self-controlled problem children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 80–91.
21.
KennedyB. A.MillerD. J. (1976). Persistent use of verbal rehearsal as a function of information about its value. Child Development, 47, 566–569.
22.
KirkR. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
23.
KramerJ. J.EngleR. W. (1981). Teaching awareness of strategic behavior in combination with strategy training: Effects on children's memory performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 513–530.
24.
KurtzB. E.BorkowskiJ. G. (1984). Children's metacognition: Exploring relations among knowledge, process, and motivational variables. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 335–354.
25.
LevineJ. M. (1983). Social comparison and education. In LevineJ. M.WangM. C. (Eds.), Teacher and student perceptions: Implications for learning (pp. 29–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
LichtB. G.KistnerJ. A. (1986). Motivational problems of learning-disabled children: Individual differences and their implications for treatment. In TorgesenJ. K.WongB. W. L. (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 225–255). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
27.
LodicoM. G.GhatalaE. S.LevinJ. R.PressleyM.BellJ. A. (1983). The effects of strategy-monitoring training on children's selection of effective memory strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 263–277.
28.
MeichenbaumD.AsarnowJ. (1979). Cognitive-behavioral modification and metacognitive development: Implications for the classroom. In KendallP. C.HollonS. D. (Eds.), Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Theory, research, and procedures (pp. 11–35). New York: Academic Press.
29.
MyersM.ParisS. G. (1978). Children's metacognitive knowledge about reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 680–690.
30.
NaslundR. A.ThorpeL. P.LefeverD. W. (1978). SRA Achievement Series. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
31.
ParisS. G.CrossD. R.LipsonM. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239–1252.
32.
ParisS. G.LipsonM. Y.WixsonK. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293–316.
33.
ParisS. G.NewmanR. S.McVeyK. A. (1982). Learning the functional significance of mnemonic actions: A microgenetic study of strategy acquisition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 490–509.
34.
PedhazurE. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
35.
RaphaelT. E.McKinneyJ. (1983). An examination of fifth-'and eighth-grade children's question-answering behavior: An instructional study in metacognition. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 67–86.
36.
RingelB. A.SpringerC. J. (1980). On knowing how well one is remembering: The persistence of strategy use during transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 322–333.
37.
SchleserR.MyersA. W.CohenR. (1981). Generalization of self-instructions: Effects of general versus specific content, active rehearsal, and cognitive level. Child Development, 52, 335–340.
38.
SchunkD. H. (1985). Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 208–223.
39.
SchunkD. H.GunnT. P. (1985). Modeled importance of task strategies and achievement beliefs: Effects on self-efficacy and skill development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 5, 247–258.
40.
SchunkD. H.RiceJ. M. (1986). Extended attributional feedback: Sequence effects during remedial reading instruction. Journal of Early Adolescence, 6, 55–66.
41.
WeinerB. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.
42.
WinerB. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
