Research on second culture and second language reading comprehension is reviewed to support the claim that second language reading is an interactive process, involving the interrelationship of cultural schemata and discourse structure. Studies on content schemata include investigations of the roles of cultural knowledge and second language proficiency in comprehension. Studies on discourse processing include linguistic descriptions of ethnolinguistic discourse patterns (contrastive rhetoric), as well as psycholinguistic comprehension studies on expository prose, story structure, and cohesion. This multidisciplinary review functions as an argument for the roles of cultural schemata and discourse structure in an interactive model of first and second language reading.
References
1.
AndersonR. C.ReynoldsR. E.SchallertD. L.GoetzE. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367–381.
2.
AnderssonB. V. (1981). Creativity as a mediating variable in inferential reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans.
3.
AnderssonB. V.BarnitzJ. G. (1984). Cross-cultural schemata and reading comprehension instruction. Journal of Reading, 28, 102–108.
4.
AnderssonB. V.GipeJ. P. (1983). Creativity as a mediating variable in inferential reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 4, 313–325.
5.
BarnitzJ. G. (1980). Syntactic effects on the reading comprehension of pronoun-referent structures by children in grades two, four and six. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 268–289.
6.
BarnitzJ. G. (1981). Reading comprehension of anaphoric syntactic structures by Vietnamese bilingual students in high school. Research on reading in secondary schools (Monograph No. 7). University of Arizona, College of Education, 69–87.
7.
BarnitzJ. G. (1982). Orthographies, bilingualism and learning to read English as a second language. The Reading Teacher, 35, 560–567.
8.
BarnitzJ. G. (1985). Reading development of nonnative speakers of English: Research and instruction. Language in Education Series, ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. (Also available on microfiche, ED 256 182).
9.
BarnitzJ. G. (1986). The anaphoric jigsaw puzzle in psycholinguistic and reading research. In IrwinJ. (Ed.), Understanding and teaching cohesion comprehension. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
10.
BartlettF. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
de BeaugrandeR.DresslerW. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman.
12.
BlachowiczC. L. Z. (1977–1978). Semantic constructivity in children's comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 8, 188–199.
13.
BransfordJ. D.JohnsonM. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726.
14.
BrewerW. F. (1984). The story schema: Universal and culture-specific properties (Tech. Rep. No. 322). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
15.
CarrellP. L. (1981a). The role of schemata in L2 comprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of TESOL, Detroit, MI.
16.
CarrellP. L. (1981b). Culture—specific schemata in L2 comprehension. In OremR. A.HaskellJ. F. (Eds.), Selected Papers from the Ninth Illinois TESOL/BE Annual Convention and the First Midwest TESOL Conference. Chicago: Illinois TESOL/BE.
17.
CarrellP. L. (1983a). Some classroom implications and applications of recent research into schema theory and EFL/ESL reading. Paper presented at the annual meeting of TESOL, Toronto.
18.
CarrellP. L. (1983b). Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge, in second language comprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of TESOL, Toronto. Published i. Reading in a Foreign Language, 1, 81–92, 1983.
19.
CarrellP. (1983c). Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning, 33, 183–207.
20.
CarrellP. L. (1984a). Evidence for a formal schema in second language comprehension. Language Learning, 34, 87–112.
21.
CarrellP. L. (1984b). The effects of rhetorical organization on ESL readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18.
22.
CarrellP. L. (1984c). Schema theory and ESL reading: Classroom implications and applications. Modern Language Journal, 68, 332–343.
23.
CarrellP. L. (1985a). A view of written text as communicative interaction: Implications for reading in a second language. Paper presented at the annual meeting of TESOL, New York.
24.
CarrellP. L. (1985b). Fostering interactive second-language reading. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Illinois TESOL/BE, Peoria, IL.
25.
CarrellP. L.EisterholdJ. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 553–574.
26.
CarrellP.WallaceB. (1983). Background knowledge: Context and familiarity in reading comprehension. ClarkeI. M.HandsomeJ. (Eds.), On TESOL '82: Pacific perspectives on language learning and teaching. Washington, DC: TESOL.
27.
ClarkeM. A. (1979). The short circuit hypothesis of ESL reading or when language competence interferes with reading performance. Modern Language Journal, 64, 203–209.
28.
ConnorU. (1984). Recall of text: Differences between first and second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 239–256.
29.
ConnorU.McCaggP. (1983). Cross-cultural differences and perceived quality in written paraphrases of English expository prose. Applied Linguistics, 4, 259–268.
30.
CowanJ. R. (1976). Reading, perceptual strategies and contrastive analysis. Language Learning, 26, 95–109.
31.
CowanJ. R. (1982). English for special purposes: The American perspective. TESL Studies, 5, 38–64.
32.
CzikoG. A. (1980). Language competence and reading strategies: A comparison of first and second language oral reading errors. Language Learning, 30, 101–116.
33.
FishmanJ. A. (1982). Whorfianism of the Third Kind: Ethnolinguistic diversity as a worldwide societal asset. Language in Society, 11, 1–15.
34.
FloresB. M. (1982). Language interference or influence: Toward a theory of Hispanic bilingualism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.
35.
GoodmanK.GoodmanY. (1978). Reading of American children whose language is a stable rural dialect of English or a language other than English (Final Rep., Project NIE-C-00–3–0087). (ERIC ED 173754).
36.
GreeneP. J. F. (1981). The morpheme conceptualization barrier: Adult non-inflected language speakers' acquisition of English morpheme structures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans.
37.
HindsJ. L. (1983). Retention of information using a Japanese style of presentation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of TESOL, Toronto.
38.
HudelsonS. (Ed.). (1981). Learning to read in different languages. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
39.
HudelsonS. (1984). Kan yu ret an rayt en Ingles: Children become literate in English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 221–238.
40.
HudsonT. (1982). The effects of induced schemata on the “short circuit” in L2 reading: Non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32, 1–31.
41.
Joag-DevC.SteffensenC. (1980). Studies of the bicultural reader: Implications for teachers and librarians (Reading Education Rep. No. 12). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
42.
JohnsonP. (1981). Effects on reading comprehension of language complexity and cultural background of a text. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 169–181.
43.
JohnsonP. (1982). Effects on reading comprehension of building background knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 503–516.
44.
KachruY. (1983). Linguistics and written discourse in particular languages: Contrastive studies: English and Hindi. In KaplanR. B. (Ed.), Annual review of applied linguistics: 1982 (Vol. III). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
45.
KaplanR. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1–20.
46.
KaplanR. B. (1976). A further note on contrastive rhetoric. Communication Quarterly, 24, 12–19.
47.
KaplanR. B. (Ed.). (1983). Annual review of applied linguistics: 1982 (Vol. III). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
48.
KavanahJ. F.VenezkyR. L. (Eds.). (1980). Orthography, reading and dyslexia. Baltimore: University Park Press.
49.
KintschW.GreeneE. (1978). The role of culture-specific schemata in the comprehension and recall of stories. Discourse Processes, 1, 1–13.
50.
LangerJ.Smith-BurkeM. T. (Eds.). (1982). Reader meets author/Bridging the gap. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
51.
LipsonM. Y. (1983). The influence of religious affiliation on children's memory for text information. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 448–465.
52.
MandlerJ. M.JohnsonN. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111–151.
53.
MandlerJ. M.ScribnerS.ColeM.DeForestM. (1980). Cross-cultural invariance in story recall. Child Development, 51, 19–26.
54.
MatsuyamaU.K. (1983). Can story grammar speak Japanese. The Reading Teacher, 36, 666–669.
55.
McClureE.MasonJ.BarnitzJ. (1979). An exploratory study of story structure and age effects on children's ability to sequence stories. Discourse Processes, 2, 213–249.
56.
McClureE.MasonJ.WilliamsJ. (1981). Sociocultural variables in children's sequencing of stories (Tech. Rep. No. 209). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
57.
MeyerB. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North Holland.
58.
MeyerB. J. F.FreedleR. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 121–143.
59.
MeyerB. J. F.RiceG. E. (1982). The interaction of reader strategies and the organization of text. Text, 2, 155–192.
60.
MohanR.LoW. A-Y. (1985). Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and developmental factors. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 515–534.
61.
MorganJ. L.SellnerM. B. (1980). Discourse and linguistic theory. In SpiroR. J.BruceB. C.BrewerW. F. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62.
PandharipandeR. (1983). Linguistics and written discourse in particular languages: Contrastive studies: English and Marathi. In KaplanR. (Ed.), Annual review of applied linguistics, 1982. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
63.
ParishC.PerkinsK. (1984). Factors influencing anaphoric processing in ESL reading comprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of TESOL, Houston.
64.
PearsonP. D.HansenJ.GordonC. (1979). The effect of background knowledge on young children's comprehension of explicit and implicit information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 201–210.
PittsM. M. (1982). Effects of cognitive styles on inferential reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans.
67.
PittsM. M.ThompsonB. (1984). Cognitive styles as mediating variables in inferential comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 426–435.
68.
ReynoldsR. E.TaylorM. A.SteffensenM. S.ShireyL. L.AndersonR. C. (1981). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension (Tech. Rep. No. 201). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
69.
RobbinsB. (1984). Language proficiency level and the comprehension of anaphoric subject pronouns by bilingual and monolingual children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of TESOL, Houston.
70.
SchaferR. (1981). Coupling as a text building, myth-evoking strategy in Vietnamese: Implications for second language reading. In HudelsonS. (Ed.), Learning to read in different languages. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
SteffensenM. S. (1981). Register, cohesion and cross-cultural reading comprehension (Tech. Rep. No. 220). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
73.
SteffensenM. S.ColkerL. (1982). The effect of cultural knowledge on memory and language (Tech. Rep. No. 248). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
74.
SteffensenM. S.Joag-DevC.AndersonR. C. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 10–29.
75.
SteinN. L.TrabassoT. (1981). What's in a story: An approach to comprehension and instruction (Tech. Rep. No. 200). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
76.
StevensK. C. (1980). The effect of background knowledge on the reading comprehension of ninth graders. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 151–154.
77.
StevensK. C. (1982). Can we improve reading by teaching background information. Journal of Reading, 25, 326–329.
78.
TaylorI.TaylorM. M. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York: Academic Press.
79.
TierneyR. J.MosenthalJ. (1982). Discourse comprehension and production: Analyzing text structure and cohesion. In LangerJ. A.Smith-Burke (Eds.), Reader meets author/Bridging the gap. Newark DE: International Reading Association.
80.
ThorndykeP. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77–110.
