This study investigated good and poor readers' ability to answer text-based inference and paraphrase questions after reading two narrative stories and two expository passages. Subjects were selected that differed only on reading comprehension, not decoding accuracy or language comprehension, and were asked text-based informational and logical inference questions which were classified according to the Warren, Nicholas, and Trabasso (1979) inference taxonomy. Subjects were also asked questions that paraphrased the verbatim information in the text. Dependent measures were researcher-designed questions and reading times for each text. Results indicate that (a) logical text-based inference questions were significantly more difficult to answer than either informational inference questions or paraphrase questions, but only after reading narrative stories; (b) paraphrase questions were as difficult to answer as informational inference questions on both types of text; (c) expository passages were significantly more difficult for the children to understand than narrative stories; (d) good readers answered significantly more text-based inference questions and paraphrase questions than poor readers on both types of text; and (e) good readers read the texts faster than poor readers.
References
1.
AdamsM. J. (1980). Failure to comprehend and levels of processing in reading. In SpiroR. J.BruceB. C.BrewerW. F. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 11–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
AndersonR. C.BiddleW. B. (1975). On asking people questions about what they are reading. In BowerG. (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 9, pp. 90–132). New York: Academic Press.
3.
BartlettF. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BerkowitzS. J.TaylorB. M. (1981). The effects of text type and familiarity on the nature of information recalled by readers. In KamilM. (Ed.), Directions in reading: Research and instruction (pp. 158–161). Washington, DC: National Reading Conference.
5.
BormuthJ.CarrJ.ManningJ.PearsonP. D. (1970). Within sentence syntactic structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 349–357.
6.
BruningJ. L.KuntzB. L. (1977). Computational handbook of statistics (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
7.
CalfeeR.ArnoldR.DrumP. (1976). A review of The psychology of reading by J. Gibson & H. Levin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Education, 3, 1–80.
8.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.
9.
CarrE. M.DewitzP.PatbergJ. (1983). The effect of inference on children's comprehension of expository text. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 1–18.
10.
CarrollJ. B.DaviesP.RichmanB. (1971). American heritage: A word frequency book. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
11.
ClarkH. H. (1977). Inferences in comprehension. In LaBergeD.SamuelsS. J. (Eds.), Basic process in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 143–264). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
DurkinD. (1978–79). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481–533.
13.
FrederiksenC. (1979). Discourse comprehension and early reading. In ResnickL.WeaverP. (Eds.), The theory and practice in early reading (Vol. 1, pp. 155–186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
GoetzE. J. (1977). Inferences in the comprehension of and memory for text (Tech. Rep. No. 49). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
15.
HieronymusA. N.LindquistE. F. (1972). Iowa Test of Basic Skills, Level 8, Form 6. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin Company.
16.
HildyardA.OlsonD. R. (1978). Memory and inferences in the comprehension of oral and written discourse. Discourse Processes, 1, 91–117.
17.
JohnsonM. K.BransfordJ. D.SolomonS. K. (1973). Memory for tacit implications of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 203–205.
18.
LaPrayM. H. (1978). San Diego Quick Assessment. West Nyack, NY; The Center for Applied Research in Education, Inc.
19.
LaBergeD.SamuelsS. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
20.
MeyerB. J. F.RiceG. E. (1984). The structure of text. In PearsonP. D.BarrR.KamilM.MosenthalP. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 319–352). New York: Longman.
21.
OmansonR. C.WarrenW. H.TrabassoT. (1978). Goals, inferential comprehension, and recall of stories by children. Discourse Processes, 1, 337–354.
22.
ParisS. G.LindauerB. K. (1976). The role of inference in children's comprehension and memory for sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 217–227.
23.
ParisS. G.UptonL. R. (1976). Children's memory for inferential relationships in prose. Child Development, 47, 660–668.
24.
ParkerD. H.ScannellG. (1973a). Reading Laboratory 1b. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates, Inc.
25.
ParkerD. H.ScannellG. (1973b). Reading Laboratory 1c. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates, Inc.
26.
PearsonP. D.JohnsonD. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
27.
PerfettiC. A. (1977). Language comprehension and fast decoding: Some psycholinguistic prerequisites for skilled reading comprehension. In GuthrieJ. (Ed.), Cognition, curriculum and comprehension (pp. 20–41). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
28.
PerfettiC. A.HogaboamT. (1975). The relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 461–469.
29.
PerfettiC. A.LesgoldA. M. (1977). Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In JustM. A.CarpenterP. A. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 141–184). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30.
PerfettiC. A.LesgoldA. M. (1979). Coding and comprehension in skilled reading and implications for reading instruction. In ResnickL. B.WeaverP. A. (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading (Vol. 1, pp. 57–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31.
RobertsonJ. E. (1968). Pupil understanding of connectives. Reading Research Quarterly, 3, 387–417.
32.
SchreinerR.ShannonP. (1980, May). The recall of explicit and implied propositions by good and poor readers using three types of assessment procedures. Paper presented at the International Reading Association, St. Louis, MO.
33.
SilvaroliN. J. (1976). Classroom reading inventory (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown Company.
34.
SRA Achievement Series, Level B, Form 2. (1978). Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates, Inc.
35.
TrabassoT. (1980). On the making of inferences during reading and their assessment (Tech. Rep. No. 157). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
36.
WallerT. G. (1976). Children's recognition memory for written sentences: A comparison of good and poor readers. Child Development, 47, 90–95.
37.
WarrenW. H.NicholasD.TrabassoT. (1979). Event chains and inferences in understanding narratives. In FreedleR. (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing: Vol. 2. Advances in discourse processes (pp. 23–52). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
38.
WilsonM. M. (1979). The processing strategies of average and below average readers answering factual and inferential questions on three equivalent passages. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 235–245.
39.
WinerB. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
