All explanations and directives related to main idea identification were classified and evaluated in four current basal reader series. Results across the four series demonstrate that explanations tend to evade admittedly difficult issues of determining importance. Reasons for this finding are discussed. Results for directives replicate previous researchers' findings.
References
1.
AullsM. W. (1978). Developmental and remedial reading in the middle grades. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
2.
Basics in Reading. (1978). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
3.
BaumannJ. F. (1982a). Research on children's main idea comprehension: A problem of ecological validity. Reading Psychology, 3, 167–177.
4.
BaumannJ. F. (1982b, December). Teaching children to comprehend main ideas. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Clearwater Beach, FL.
5.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G.McCaslinE. S.BurkesA. M. (1979). Instructional dimensions that may affect reading comprehension: Examples from two commercial reading programs. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, Learning and Research Development Center.
6.
BelmontJ. M.ButterfieldE. C. (1977). The instructional approach to developmental cognitive research. In KailR. V.Jr.HagenJ. W. (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 437–481). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
BelmoreS. M.MatthewsP.BridgeC. A.MoskowS. P.CohenS. G. (1982). Effects of initial mention and orienting task on readers' comprehension of main idea. In NilesJ. A.HarrisL. A. (Eds.), New inquiries in reading research and instruction: Thirty-first yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 29–36). Rochester, NY: The National Reading Conference.
8.
BrownA. L.CampioneJ. C.DayJ. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from text. Educational Researcher, 10, 14–21.
9.
CampioneJ. C.ArmbrusterB. B. (in press). Acquiring information from texts: An analysis of four approaches. In ChipmanS.SegalJ.GlaserR. (Eds.), Cognitive skills and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.
DuffyG. G.RoehlerL. R. (1982). Commentary: The illusion of instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 438–445.
11.
DurkinD. (1978–79). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481–533.
12.
DurkinD. (1981). Reading comprehension instruction in five basal reader series. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 515–544.
13.
GarnerR.HareV. C.AlexanderP.HaynesJ.WinogradP. N. (in press). Inducing use of a text lookback strategy among unsuccessful readers. American Educational Research Journal.
14.
HarrisA. J.SipayE. R. (1980). How to increase reading ability: A guide to developmental and remedial methods (7th ed.). New York: Longman.
15.
The Holt Basic Reading System. (1977). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
16.
JenkinsJ. R.PanyD. (1980). Teaching reading comprehension in the middle grades. In SpiroR. J.BruceB. C.BrewerW. F. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 555–574). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17.
JohnsonD. D.BarrettT. C. (1981). Prose comprehension: A descriptive analysis of instructional practices. In SantaC. M.HayesB. L. (Eds.), Children's prose comprehension: Research and practice (pp. 72–102). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
18.
JollyH. B.Jr. (1974). Determining main ideas: A basic study skill. In HafnerL. E. (Ed.), Improving reading in middle and secondary school: Selected readings (2nd ed., pp. 162–172). New York: Macmillan.
19.
MeichenbaumD.AsarnowJ. (1979). Cognitive-behavioral modification and metacognitive development: Implications for the classroom. In KendallP. C.HollonS. D. (Eds.), Cognitive-behavioral interventions: Theory, research, and procedures (pp. 11–35). New York: Academic Press.
20.
Pathfinder. (1978). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
21.
PearsonP. D. (1984). Direct explicit teaching of reading comprehension. In DuffyG. G.RoehlerL. R.MasonJ. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 222–233). New York: Longman.
22.
PearsonP. D.JohnsonD. D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
23.
RoehlerL. R.DuffyG. G. (1984). Direct explanation of comprehension processes. In DuffyG. G.RoehlerL. R.MasonJ. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 265–280). New York: Longman.
24.
Scott, Foresman Reading. (1983). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
25.
SjostromC. L.HareV. C. (in press). Teaching high school students to identify main ideas in expository text. Journal of Educational Research.
26.
SteinN. L.TrabassoT. (1982). What's in a story: An approach to comprehension and instruction. In GlaserR. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 213–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27.
WinogradP. N. (in press). Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts. Reading Research Quarterly.
28.
WinogradP. N.BrennanS. (1983). Main idea instruction in the basal readers. In NilesJ. A.HarrisL. A. (Eds.), Searches for meaning in reading/language processing and instruction: Thirty-second yearbook of The National Reading Conference (pp. 80–86). Rochester, NY: The National Reading Conference.
