The Effects of Time,Access,and Question Type on Response Accuracy and Frequency of Lookbacks in Older,Proficient Readers

Abstract

This investigation examined the effects of variation in conditions for learning on lookback use and response accuracy in proficient readers and explored readers' awareness of their strategic behavior. Fifty-two college undergraduates studied a 1300-word expository passage and answered three text-based questions and one reader-based question. Half of the subjects worked under a 10-minute time limit, while the others had unlimited time. For half of the subjects, questions were presented with the passage; for the other half, questions were received after the passage had been studied and turned over. Analysis revealed that subjects who had the questions presented with the text looked back more and responded more accurately than did those receiving questions separately. Time limit did not affect use of lookbacks or accuracy, and subjects looked back for text-based questions only. Based on comparison with observational data, post-task verbal reports were found to be fairly accurate records of lookback use.

References

Alessi

S. M.

Anderson

T. H.

Goetz

E. T.

(1979). An investigation of lookbacks during studying. Discourse Processes, 2, 197–212.

Anderson

T. H.

(1979). Study skills and learning strategies. In O'Neil

H. F.

Jr. Spielberger

C. D.

(Eds.), Cognitive and affective learning strategies (pp. 77–97). New York: Academic Press.

Brown

A. L.

Lawton

S. C.

(1977). The feeling of knowing experience in educable retarded children. Developmental Psychology, 13, 364–370.

Brown

J. I.

(1975). Reading power. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath & Co.

Cavanaugh

J. C.

Perlmutter

(1982). Metamemory: A critical examination. Child Development, 53, 11–28.

Ericsson

K. A.

Simon

H. A.

(1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.

Garner

(1982). Verbal-report data on reading strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 159–167.

Garner

Hare

V. C.

(1983). Efficacy of text lookback training at two age levels. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Garner

Hare

V. C.

Alexander

Haynes

Winograd

P. N.

(in press). Inducing use of a text lookback strategy among unsuccessful readers. American Educational Research Journal.

10.

Garner

Macready

G. B.

Wagoner

(in press). Readers' acquisition of the components of the text lookback strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology.

11.

Garner

Reis

(1981). Monitoring and resolving comprehension obstacles: An investigation of spontaneous text lookbacks among upper-grade good and poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 569–582.

12.

Hansen

Pearson

P. D.

(1983). An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of good and poor fourth-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 821–829.

13.

Hare

V. C.

(1981). Readers' problem identification and problem solving strategies for high- and low-knowledge articles. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 359–365.

14.

Hare

V. C.

Smith

D. C.

(1982). Reading to remember: Studies of metacognitive reading skills in elementary school-aged children. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 157–164.

15.

Nisbett

R. E.

Wilson

T. D.

(1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.

16.

Reder

L. M.

Anderson

J. R.

(1980). A comparison of texts and their summaries: Memorial consequences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 121–134.

17.

White

(1980). Limitations on verbal reports of internal events: A refutation of Nisbett and Wilson and of Bem. Psychology Review, 87, 105–112.