This study examined the effects of vocabulary pre-instruction on reading comprehension. Two vocabulary training treatments, chosen on the basis of a theoretical framework for vocabulary instruction, and a control were used with 28 average fifth-grade readers. For two of three order groups, both training treatments produced significantly higher scores on passage tests, and, for all children, both training treatments produced significantly higher scores on two sentence comprehension measures and a multiple-choice synonym test, indicating that pre-instruction had a significant effect on both comprehension and vocabulary learning. In addition, a mixed method of vocabulary instruction, or one which provided both definitional and contextual information about the taught words, produced significantly higher comprehension scores than did a definitional method.
References
1.
MargoseinC. M.PascarellaE. T.PflaumS. W.The effects of instruction using semantic mapping on vocabulary and comprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting, American Educational Research Association, 1982.
2.
AhlforsG.Learning word meanings: A comparison of three instructional procedures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1979.
3.
AndersonJ. R.RederL. M.An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In CermakL. S.CraikF. I. M. (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1979.
4.
AndersonR. C.FreebodyP.Vocabulary knowledge. In GuthrieJ. T. (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research perspectives. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1981.
5.
AndersonR. C.KulhavyR. W.Learning concepts from definitions. American Educational Research Journal, 1972, 9, 385–390.
6.
AndersonR. C.McGawB.On the representation of meaning of general terms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 101, 301–306.
7.
AndersonR. C.OrtonyA.On putting apples into bottles—a problem of polysemy. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7, 167–180.
8.
AndersonR. C.PichertJ. W.GoetzE. T.SchallertD. L.StevensK. V.TrollipS.Instantiation of general terms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976, 15, 667–679.
9.
BaddesleyA.The trouble with levels: An examination of Craik and Lockhart's framework for memory research. Psychological Review, 1978, 85, 139–152.
10.
BarronR. F.MelnikR.The effects of discussion upon learning vocabulary meanings and relationships in tenth grade biology. In HerberH. L.BarronR. F. (Eds.), Research in reading in the content areas, second year report. Syracuse: Reading and Language Arts Center, Syracuse University, 1973.
11.
BeckerW.Teaching reading and language to the disadvantaged. Harvard Educational Review, 1977, 47, 518–543.
12.
California Test Bureau. California Achievement Tests, Form C. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill, 1978.
13.
ChallJ. S.Readability: An appraisal of research and application. Columbus, OH: Bureau of Educational Research, Ohio State University, 1958.
14.
CollinsA. M.LoftusE. E.A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 1975, 82, 406–428.
15.
CollinsA. M.QuillianM. R.Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969, 8, 240–248.
16.
CraikF. I. M.TulvingE.Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975, 104, 268–294.
17.
CristR.PetroneJ.Learning concepts from contexts and definitions. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1977, 9, 301–303.
18.
DaleE.ChallJ. S.A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 1948, 27, 11–20, 37–54.
19.
DaleE.O'RourkeJ.The living word vocabulary. Chicago: Field Enterprises, 1976.
20.
DavisF. B.Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading. Psychometrika, 1944, 9, 185–197.
21.
FarrR.Reading–What can be measured?. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1969.
GrayW. S.HolmesE.The development of meaning vocabulary in reading. Chicago: Publications of the Laboratory Schools of the University of Chicago, 1936.
26.
JenkinsJ. R.PanyD.SchreckJ.Vocabulary and reading comprehension: Instructional effects (Tech. Rep. No. 100). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading, August 1978. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 160 999).
27.
Johnson-LairdP. N.GibbsG.deMowbrayJ.Meaning, amount of processing and memory for words. Memory and Cognition, 1978, 6, 372–375.
JohnsonD.StrattonP.Evaluation of five methods of teaching concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1966, 57, 48–53.
30.
KameenuiE. J.CarnineD. W.FreschiR.Effects of text construction and instructional procedures for teaching word meanings or comprehension and recall. Reading Research Quarterly, 1982, 17, 367–388.
31.
KintschW.The representation of meaning in memory, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1974.
32.
KlareG. R.Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 1974–1975, 10, 62–102.
33.
LangerJ. A.Facilitating text processing: The elaboration of prior knowledge. In LangerJ. A.Smith-BurkeM. T. (Eds.), Reader meets author/Bridging the gap. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1982.
34.
LockhartR. S.CraikF. I. M.Levels of processing: A reply to Eysenck. British Journal of Psychology, 1978, 69, 171–175.
35.
McCloskeyM. E.GlucksbergS.Natural categories: Well-defined or fuzzy sets?Memory and Cognition, 1978, 6, 462–472.
36.
MeyerD. E.SchvaneveldtR. W.Meaning, memory structure, and mental processes. In CoferC. (Ed.), The structure of human memory. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.
37.
PaivioA.Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1971.
38.
PanyD.JenkinsJ.Learning word meanings: A comparison of instructional procedures and effects on measures of reading comprehension with learning disabled students (Tech. Rep. No. 25). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading, 1977. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service Ed 134 979).
39.
PearsonP. D.HansenJ. D.GordonD.The effect of background knowledge on young children's comprehension of explicit and implicit information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1979, 11, 201–209.
40.
PettyW.HeroldC.StollE.The state of the knowledge about the teaching of vocabulary (Cooperative Research Project No. 3128). Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 1968.
41.
RoschE.Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975, 104, 192–233.
42.
RoschE.MervisC.Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7, 573–602.
43.
RumelhartD. E.LindsayP.NormanD.A process model for long-term memory. In TulvingE.DonaldsonW. (Eds.), Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
44.
RumelhartD. E.OrtonyA.The representation of knowledge in memory. In AndersonR. C.SpiroR. J.MontagueW. E. (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.
45.
SchacterS. W.An investigation of the effects of vocabulary instruction and schemata orientation on reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1978.
46.
SmithE. E.MedinD. L.Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.
SpearittD.Identification of subskills of reading comprehension by maximum likelihood factor analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 1972, 8, 92–111.
49.
StahlS. A.Differential word knowledge and reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1982.
50.
SternbergR. J.PowellJ. S.Comprehending verbal comprehension. American Psychologist, in press.
51.
ThorndykeP.Conceptual complexity and imagery in comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975, 14, 359–369.
52.
TuinmanJ. J.BradyM. E.How does vocabulary account for variance on reading comprehension tests: A preliminary instructional analysis. In NackeP. (Ed.), Interaction: Research and practice in college-adult reading. Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference, 1974.
53.
WeaverP. A.Improving reading comprehension: Effects of sentence organization instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 1979, 15, 129–146.
54.
WittrockM. D.MarksC.DoctorowM.Reading as a generative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975, 67, 481–489.
55.
YapK. O.Vocabulary—building blocks of comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1979, 11, 49–59.
